HSS Journal ®

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 262–269 | Cite as

Metal-on-Metal Bearing: Is This the End of the Line? We Do Not Think So

  • Henri Migaud
  • Sophie Putman
  • Antoine Combes
  • Charles Berton
  • Donatien Bocquet
  • Laurent Vasseur
  • Julien Girard
Current Topics Concerning Joint Preservation and Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip



Recent studies have recommended the discontinuation of metal-on-metal (MoM) components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of adverse effects reported with large-diameter MoM THA. This is despite favorable long-term results observed with 28 and 32 mm MoM bearings.


The aim of this study was to assess the value of calls for an end to MoM bearings as THA components. Specifically, we wish to address the risks associated with MoM bearings including adverse soft tissue reactions, metal ion release, and carcinogenic risk.


The study evaluates the arguments in the literature reporting on MoM (adverse soft tissue reactions, metal ion release, and carcinogenic risk) and the experience of the current authors who re-introduced these bearings in 1995. They are balanced by a benefit–risk review of the literature and the authors’ experience with MoM use.


Adverse reactions to metallic debris as well as metal ion release are predictable and can be prevented by adequate design (arc of coverage, clearance), metallurgy (forged instead of cast alloy, high-carbide content), and appropriate component orientation. There is no scientific evidence that carcinogenicity is increased in subjects with MoM hip prostheses. MoM articulations appear to be attractive allowing safe hip resurfacing, decreasing the risk of THA revision in active patients, and providing secure THA fixation with cement in cages in severely deformed hips. MoM bearings in women of child-bearing age are controversial, but long-term data on metallic devices in adolescents undergoing spinal surgery seem reassuring.


Adequate selection of MoM articulations ensures their safe use. These articulations are sensitive to orientation. Fifteen years of safe experience with 28- and 32-mm bearings of forged alloy and high-carbide content is the main reason for retaining them in primary and revision THA.


metal-on-metal bearing metal sensitivity chromium wear cobalt, ions hip resurfacing pseudotumors 


  1. 1.
    Shetty V, Shitole B, Shetty G, Thakur H, Bhandari M. Optimal bearing surfaces for total hip replacement in the young patient: a meta-analysis. Int. Orthop. 2011; 35: 1281–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0–22 years. Acta Orthop. 2005; 76: 28–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weber BG. Experience with the Metasul total hip bearing system. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1996; 329(Suppl): S69–S77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allain J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Delecrin J, Anract P, Migaud H, Goutallier D. Revision total hip arthroplasty performed after fracture of a ceramic femoral head. A multicenter survivorship study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2003; 85: 825–830.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamadouche M, Boutin P, Daussange J, et al. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 18.5-year follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2002; 84: 69–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baad-Hansen T, Storgaard Jakobsen S, Soballe K. Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system—a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips. Int. Orthop. 2011; 35: 497–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pabinger C, Biedermann R, Stöckl B, Fischer M, Krismer M. Migration of metal-on-metal versus ceramic-on-polyethylene hip prostheses. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003; 412: 103–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dandy DJ, Theodorou BC. The management of local complications of total hip replacement by the McKee–Farrar technique. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1975; 57: 30–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dobbs HS. Survivorship of total hip replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1980; 62:168–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Delaunay CP. Metal-on-metal bearings in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 2004; 19: 35–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dorr LD, Wan Z, Longjohn DB, Dubois B, Murken R. Total hip arthroplasty with use of the Metasul metal-on-metal articulation. Four- to seven-year results. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2000; 82: 789–798.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Girard J, Bocquet D, Autissier G, Fouilleron N, Migaud H. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in patients thirty years of age or younger. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2010; 92: 2419–2426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grübl A, Weissinger M, Brodner W, et al. Serum aluminium and cobalt levels after ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2006; 88: 1003–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Migaud H, Putman S, Krantz N, Vasseur L, Girard J. Cementless metal-on-metal versus ceramic-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty in patients less than 50 years of age: a comparative study at 12- to 14-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011; 93 suppl2: 137–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Alexiades MM, et al. Short-term results of the M2a-taper metal-on-metal articulation. J. Arthroplasty. 2001; 16(8 Suppl 1): 122–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Cuckler JM, Williams J, Berend KR, Smith TM. Mid-term results of a polyethylene-free metal-on-metal articulation. J. Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(7 Suppl 2): 42–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mohamad JA, Kwan MK, Merican AM, Abbas AA, Kamari ZH, Hisa MK, Ismail Z, Idrus RM. Early results of metal on metal articulation total hip arthroplasty in young patients. Med J Malaysia. 2004; 59 Suppl F: 3–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005; 87: 28–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beaulé PE, Kim PR, Powell J, and Canadian Hip Resurfacing Study Group. A survey on the prevalence of pseudotumors with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in Canadian academic centers. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011; 93: 118–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bernasek T, Fisher D, Dalury D, Levering M, Dimitris K. Is metal-on-metal squeaking related to acetabular angle of inclination? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011; 469: 2577–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AV. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2010; 92: 38–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS, Lord J, Van Orsouw M, Holland JP, Nargol AV, De Smet KA. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2011; 93: 164–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2008; 90: 847–851.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dahlstrand H, Stark A, Anissian L, Hailer NP. Elevated serum concentrations of cobalt, chromium, nickel, and manganese after metal-on-metal alloarthroplasty of the hip: a prospective randomized study. J. Arthroplasty. 2009; 24: 837–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lavigne M, Belzile EL, Roy A, Morin F, Amzica T, Vendittoli PA. Comparison of whole-blood metal ion levels in four types of metal-on-metal large-diameter femoral head total hip arthroplasty: the potential influence of the adapter sleeve. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011; 93 Suppl 2: 128–136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS, Murray DW. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009; 91: 1566–1574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Catelas I, Campbell PA, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Huk OL. Wear particles from metal-on-metal total hip replacements: effects of implant design and implantation time. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. 2006; 220: 195–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Iavicoli I, Falcone G, Alessandrelli M, Cresti R, De Santis V, Salvatori S, Alimonti A, Carelli G. The release of metals from metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2006; 20: 25–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Chess DG, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Cleland D, Leung F. Metal-on-metal versus polyethylene in hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003; 406: 282–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schaffer AW, Pilger A, Engelhardt C, Zweymueller K, Ruediger HW. Increased blood cobalt and chromium after total hip replacement. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 1999; 37: 839–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brodner W, Bitzan P, Meisinger V, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Kotz R. Elevated serum cobalt with metal-on-metal articulating surfaces. J Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1997; 79: 316–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brodner W, Bitzan P, Meisinger V, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Kotz R. Serum cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2003; 85: 2168–2173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vendittoli PA, Roy A, Mottard S, Girard J, Lusignan D, Lavigne M. Metal ion release from bearing wear and corrosion with 28 mm and large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing articulations: a follow up study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2010; 92: 12–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Doorn PF, et al. Cobalt and chromium concentrations in patients with metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1996; 329: 256–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C, McMinn DJ. Systemic metal exposure in large- and small-diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Orthopedics. 2008; 31(12 Suppl 2): http://www.orthosupersite.com/view.aspx?rid=37189#jump.
  36. 36.
    Ollivere B, Darrah C, Barker T, Nolan J, Porteous MJ. Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009; 91: 1025–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gruber FW, Bock A, Trattnig S, Lintner F, Ritschl P. Cystic lesion of the groin due to metallosis: a rare long-term complication of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 2007; 22: 923–927.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grübl A, Marker M, Brodner W, Giurea A, Heinze G, Meisinger V, Zehetgruber H, Kotz R. Long-term follow-up of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J. Orthop. Res. 2007; 25: 841–848.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fujishiro T, Moojen DJ, Kobayashi N, Dhert WJ, Bauer TW. Perivascular and diffuse lymphocytic inflammation are not specific for failed metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011; 469: 1127–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Murgatroyd SE. Pseudotumor presenting as a pelvic mass: a complication of eccentric wear of a metal on polyethylene hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 27: 820.e1–4. PMID: 22018875.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Anderson H, Toms AP, Cahir JG, Goodwin RW, Wimhurst J, Nolan JF. Grading the severity of soft tissue changes associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements: reliability of an MR grading system. Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40: 303–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cooper HJ, Ranawat AS, Potter HG, Foo LF, Koob TW, Ranawat CS. Early reactive synovitis and osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat Res. 2010; 468: 3278–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hailer NP, Blaheta RA, Dahlstrand H, Stark A. Elevation of circulating HLA DR(+) CD8(+) T-cells and correlation with chromium and cobalt concentrations 6 years after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2011; 82: 6–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Massè A, Bosetti M, Buratti C, Visentin O, Bergadano D, Cannas M. Ion release and chromosomal damage from total hip prostheses with metal-on-metal articulation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Appl. Biomater. 2003; 67: 750–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tharani R, Dorey FJ, Schmalzried TP. The risk of cancer following total hip or knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2001; 83: 774–779.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Visuri T, Borg H, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P, Pukkala E. A retrospective comparative study of mortality and causes of death among patients with metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene total hip prostheses in primary osteoarthritis after a long-term follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2010; 11: 78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vendittoli PA, Amzica T, Roy AG, Lusignan D, Girard J, Lavigne M. Metal ion release with large-diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2011; 26: 282–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Vendittoli PA, Mottard S, Roy AG, Dupont C, Lavigne M. Chromium and cobalt ion release following the Durom high carbon content, forged metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2007; 89: 441–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Donell ST, Darrah C, Nolan JF, Wimhurst J, Toms A, Barker TH, Case CP, Tucker JK; Norwich Metal-on-Metal Study Group. Early failure of the Ultima metal-on-metal total hip replacement in the presence of normal plain radiographs. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2010; 92: 1501–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Engh CA Jr, MacDonald SJ, Sritulanondha S, Thompson A, Naudie D, Engh CA. 2008 John Charnley award: metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009; 467: 101–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jacobs M, Gorab R, Mattingly D, Trick L, Southworth C. Three- to six-year results with the Ultima metal-on-metal hip articulation for primary total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(7 Suppl 2): 48–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kretzer JP, Kleinhans JA, Jakubowitz E, Thomsen M, Heisel C. A meta-analysis of design- and manufacturing-related parameters influencing the wear behavior of metal-on-metal hip joint replacements. J. Orthop. Res. 2009; 27: 1473–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rieker CB, Schon R, Konrad R, Liebentritt G, Gnepf P, Shen M, Roberts P, Grigoris P. Influence of the clearance on in-vitro tribology of large diameter metal-on-metal articulations pertaining to resurfacing hip implants. Orthop. Clin. North. Am. 2005; 36: 135–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010; 468: 318–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Isaac GH, Siebel T, Oakeshott RD, McLennan-Smith R, Cobb AG, Schmalzried TP, Vail TP. Changes in whole blood metal ion levels following resurfacing: serial measurements in a multi-centre study. Hip Int. 2009; 19: 330–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Savarino L, Granchi D, Ciapetti G, et al. Ion release in stable hip arthroplasties using metal-on-metal articulating surfaces: a comparison between short- and medium-term results. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2003; 66: 450–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yan Y, Neville A, Dowson D. Understanding the role of corrosion in the degradation of metal-on-metal implants. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 2006; 220: 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dunstan E, Sanghrajka AP, Tilley S, Unwin P, Blunn G, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. Metal ion levels after metal-on-metal proximal femoral replacements: a 30-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2005; 87: 628–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, Hallab NJ, Paprosky WG, Black J, Galante JO. Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled, longitudinal study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1998; 80: 1447–1458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Asencio G, Essig J, Nourissat C. Réaction tissulaire locale anormale après PTH avec modularité fémorale en chrome cobalt. Rev. Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. 2011; 97 Suppl 7: 260.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Luetzner J, Krummenauer F, Lengel AM, Ziegler J, Witzleb WC. Serum metal ion exposure after total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007; 461: 136–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lützner J, Dinnebier G, Hartmann A, Günther KP, Kirschner S. Study rationale and protocol: prospective randomized comparison of metal ion concentrations in the patient's plasma after implantation of coated and uncoated total knee prostheses. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2009; 10: 128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ziaee H, Daniel J, Datta AK, Blunt S, McMinn DJ. Transplacental transfer of cobalt and chromium in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: a controlled study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2007; 89: 301–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    del Rio J, Beguiristain J, Duart J. Metal levels in corrosion of spinal implants. Eur. Spine J. 2007; 16: 1055–1061.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Richardson TD, Pineda SJ, Strenge KB, Van Fleet TA, MacGregor M, Milbrandt JC, Espinosa JA, Freitag P. Serum titanium levels after instrumented spinal arthrodesis. Spine 2008; 33: 792–796.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zeh A, Planert M, Siegert G, Lattke P, Held A, Hein W. Release of cobalt and chromium ions into the serum following implantation of the metal-on-metal Maverick-type artificial lumbar disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek). Spine 2007; 32: 348–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Corten K, Ganz R, Simon JP, Leunig M. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: current status and future perspectives. Eur. Cell. Mater. 2011; 21: 243–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Girard J. Hip resurfacing in patients under 30 years old. Hip Symposium on the Future of Hip Resurfacing, 12th EFORT Meeting, June 1–4, 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Aulakh TS, Kuiper JH, Dixey J, Richardson JB. Hip resurfacing for rheumatoid arthritis: independent assessment of 11-year results from an international register. Int. Orthop. 2011; 35: 803–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Aulakh TS, Rao C, Kuiper JH, Richardson JB. Hip resurfacing and osteonecrosis: results from an independent hip resurfacing register. Arch. Orthop. Trauma. Surg. 2010; 130: 841–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Stulberg BN, Fitts SM, Zadzilka JD, Trier K. Resurfacing arthroplasty for patients with osteonecrosis. Bull. NYU Hosp. Jt Dis. 2009; 67: 138–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Li J, Xu W, Xu L, Liang Z. Hip resurfacing for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Orthopedics. 2008; 31:1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Boyd HS, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Marulanda GA, Mont MA. Resurfacing for Perthes disease: an alternative to standard hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007; 465: 80–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM, Ulrich SD, McGrath MS. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009; 467: 66–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Smith TO, Nichols R, Donell ST, Hing CB. The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Orthop. 2010; 81: 684–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Stulberg BN, Fitts SM, Bowen AR, Zadzilka JD. Early return to function after hip resurfacing: is it better than contemporary total hip arthroplasty? J. Arthroplasty. 2010; 25: 748–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kim PR, Beaulé PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J. Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(6 Suppl 1): 44–9.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007; 465: 63–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Stulberg BN, Trier KK, Naughton M, Zadzilka JD. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2008; 90 Suppl 3: 21–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Roy AG, Lusignan D, Lavigne M. A comparison of clinical results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 28 mm metal on metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomised trial with 3–6 years follow-up. Hip Int. 2010; 20: 1–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Grammatopolous G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Gill HS. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009; 91: 1019–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Eswaramoorthy VK, Biant LC, Field RE. Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2009; 91: 1454–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    McGrath MS, Marker DR, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, Mont MA. Surface replacement is comparable to primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009; 467: 94–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    O'Neill M, Beaule PE, Bin Nasser A, Garbuz D, Lavigne M, Duncan C, Kim PR, Schemitsch E. Canadian academic experience with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Bull. NYU Hosp. Jt Dis. 2009; 67: 128–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Ramakrishnan R, Jaffe WL, Kennedy WR. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing radiographic evaluation techniques. J. Arthroplasty. 2008; 23: 1099–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Howie DW, McGee MA, Costi K, Graves SE. Metal-on-metal resurfacing versus total hip replacement-the value of a randomized clinical trial. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2005; 36: 195–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Girard J, Combes A, Herent S, Migaud H. Metal-on-metal cups cemented into reinforcement rings: a possible new acetabular reconstruction procedure for young and active patients. J. Arthroplasty 2011; 26: 103–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Girard J, Glorion C, Bonnomet F, Fron D, Migaud H. Risk factors for revision of hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 30 years. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011; 469: 1141–1147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Milosev I, Trebse R, Kovac S, Cör A, Pisot V. Survivorship and retrieval analysis of Sikomet metal-on-metal total hip replacements at a mean of seven years. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2006; 88: 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Yang JM, Ahn G, Choi YL. Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2005; 87: 1515–1521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Zijlstra WP, Cheung J, Sietsma MS, van Raay JJ, Deutman R. No superiority of cemented metal-on-metal vs metal-on-polyethylene THA at 5-year follow-up. Orthopedics. 2009; 32: 479.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Jarrett CA, Ranawat AS, Bruzzone M, Blum YC, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. The squeaking hip: a phenomenon of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009; 91: 1344–1349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Kurtz SM, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. The noisy ceramic hip: is component malpositioning the cause? J. Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 643–649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Koo KH, Ha YC, Jung WH, Kim SR, Yoo JJ, Kim HJ. Isolated fracture of the ceramic head after third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2008; 90: 329–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Szymanski C, Guériot S, Boniface O, Deladerrière JY, Luneau S, Maynou C. Sandwich type ceramic liner fracture rate with the Atlas III™ socket: a study of 144 primary total hip replacements at a mean 74 months’ follow-up. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2011; 97: 494–500.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henri Migaud
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sophie Putman
    • 1
    • 4
  • Antoine Combes
    • 1
    • 3
  • Charles Berton
    • 1
    • 3
  • Donatien Bocquet
    • 1
    • 3
  • Laurent Vasseur
    • 1
    • 3
  • Julien Girard
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Roger Salengro HospitalUniversity of LilleLille CedexFrance
  2. 2.Department of Sport and MedicineUniversity of Lille 2LilleFrance
  3. 3.Orthopaedics DepartmentUniversity of LilleLille CedexFrance
  4. 4.Orthopaedic DepartmentLille University HospitalLille CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations