Skip to main content
Log in

Hip Resurfacing: a 40-Year Perspective

  • Current Topics Concerning Joint Preservation and Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip
  • Published:
HSS Journal ®

Abstract

Background

Saving bone by resurfacing the femoral head is not a new concept and the appeal for this type of hip replacement has remained despite the difficulties to find a bearing material suitable for this procedure.

Purpose

In this article, the unique experience of a surgeon who has been performing hip resurfacing since its early development is presented, along with a comparative analysis of the performance of successive designs.

Results

The overall 10-year Kaplan–Meier survivorship of the early designs with polyethylene bearings did not exceed 62% while that of the current Conserve®Plus metal-on-metal hybrid design implanted with second generation surgical technique is in excess of 92%. Further exceptional, in the 10-year survivorship, 99.7% has been achieved with femoral size of 46 mm and good bone quality. Cementless acetabular components provide better enduring fixation than cemented designs.

Discussion

Metal-on-metal is currently and fortunately the only highly successful bearing material that can combine low wear rates and the manufacturing of a thin acetabular component to preserve bone and still accommodate the large femoral head of a hip resurfacing. The adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) associated with metal-on-metal devices are not a bearing material issue per se but one of the device design and surgical technique. Almost all of ALTR and the rare events of systemic toxicity are due to abnormal wear patterns which can be prevented by proper acetabular component design and precise socket orientation in both the coronal and sagittal planes. Further improvements of the long-term durability with hip resurfacing can be anticipated with the use of recently developed trabecular bone-like tantalum or titanium porous coatings and with proper training of the surgeons interested in performing hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amstutz H, Beaulé P, Dorey F, Le Duff M, Campbell P, Gruen T: Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty—surgical technique. J Bone and Joint Surg, 88 A(suppl 1 part 2): 234–249, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amstutz, H.; Grigoris, P.; and Dorey, F.: Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J Orthop Sci, 3(3): 169–86, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amstutz, H., and Le Duff, M.: Background of metal-on-metal resurfacing. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H], 220(2): 85–94, 2006.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Amstutz, H., and Le Duff, M.: Evolution of hip resurfacing. In Hip Resurfacing: Principles, Indications, Technique and Results, pp. 1–15. Edited by Amstutz, H. C., 1–15, Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amstutz, H.; Le Duff, M.; Campbell, P.; and Dorey, F.: The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3–9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 22(4): 481–9, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Amstutz, H. C.: Surface replacement arthroplasty. In Total Hip Arthroplasty, pp. 295–332. Edited by Amstutz, H. C., 295–332, New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Amstutz, H. C.; Campbell, P.; Kossovsky, N.; and Clarke, I. C.: Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. Clin Orthop, (276): 7–18, 1992.

  8. Amstutz, H. C.; Campbell, P.; Nasser, S.; and Kossovsky, N.: Modes of failure of surface replacements. In Hip Arthroplasty, pp. 507–534. Edited by Amstutz, H. C., 507–534, New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amstutz, H. C.; Clarke, I. C.; Christie, J.; and Graff-Radford, A.: Total hip articular replacement by internal eccentric shells: the tharies approach to total surface replacement arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, (128): 261–84., 1977.

  10. Amstutz, H. C.; Sparling, E. A.; Grigoris, P.; Campbell, P. A.; and Dorey, F. J.: Surface replacement: the hip replacement of the future. Hip International, 8(4): 187–207, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Amstutz, H. C.; Takamura, K.; and Le Duff, M.: The effect of patient selection and surgical technique on the results of Conserve® Plus hip resurfacing—3.5- to 14-year follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am, I42(2): 133–42, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ball, S.; Le Duff, M.; and Amstutz, H.: Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone and Joint Surg Am, 89: 735–41, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Banerjee, M.; Bouillon, B.; Banerjee, C.; Bäthis, H.; Lefering, R.; Nardini, M.; and Schmidt, J.: Sports activity after total hip resurfacing. Am J Sports Med., 38(6): 1229–36, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beaulé, P.; Dorey, F.; and Le Duff, M.: Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85-A(12): 2288–93, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beaulé, P.; Le Duff, M.; Campbell, P.; Dorey, F.; Park, S.; and Amstutz, H.: Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: A 7–10 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty, 19(12): 17–22, 2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell, P.; Mirra, J.; and Amstutz, H. C.: Viability of femoral heads treated with resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 15(1):120–2, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper, R. A.; McAllister, C. M.; Borden, L. S.; and Bauer, T. W.: Polyethylene debris-induced osteolysis and loosening in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. A cause of late failure. Journal of Arthroplasty, 7(3): 285–90, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. De Haan, R.; Pattyn, C.; Gill, H.; Murray, D.; Campbell, P.; and De Smet, K.: Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 90(10): 1291–7, 2008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eswaramoorthy, V.; Biant, L.; and Field, R.: Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 91(11): 1454–8, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Garbuz, D.; Tanzer, M.; Greidanus, N.; Masri, B.; and Duncan, C.: The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing versus Large-diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res., 468(2): 318–25, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gruen, T.; Le Duff, M.; Wisk, L.; and Amstutz, H.: Prevalence and clinical relevance of radiographic signs of impingement in metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing. J Bone and Joint Surg Am., 93(16): 1519–26, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Head, W. C.: The Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am, 13(4): 789–97, 1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ikeda, T.; Takahashi, K.; Kabata, T.; Sakagoshi, D.; Tomita, K.; and Yamada, M.: Polyneuropathy caused by cobalt–chromium metallosis after total hip replacement. Muscle Nerve 42(1): 140–3, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jasty, M.; Bragdon, C.; Jiranek, W.; Chandler, H.; Maloney, W.; and Harris, W. H.: Etiology Of Osteolysis Around Porous-Coated Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasties. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 308(NOV): 111–126, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jolley, M.; Salvati, E.; and Brown, G.: Early Results and Complications of Surface Replacement of the Hip. J Bone Joint Surg [AM], 64(3): 366–377, 1982.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar, M.; Shetty, M.; Kiran, K.; and Kini, A.: Validation of navigation assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop., 36(1): 17–22, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Langton, D.; Jameson, S.; Joyce, T.; Gandhi, J.; Sidaginamale, R.; Mereddy, P.; Lord, J.; and Nargol, A.: Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 93(8): 1011–6, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Langton, D.; Sprowson, A.; Joyce, T.; Reed, M.; Carluke, I.; Partington, P.; and Nargol, A.: Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties. JBJS Br, 91(10): 1287–95, 2009.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Le Duff, M., and Amstutz, H. C.: Sporting activity after hip resurfacing: Changes over time. Orthop Clin North Am, 42(2): 161–7, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mai, M. T.; Schmalzried, T. P.; Dorey, F. J.; Campbell, P. A.; and Amstutz, H. C.: The contribution of frictional torque to loosening at the cement–bone interface in Tharies hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78(4): 505–11, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Maloney, W. J., and Smith, R. L.: Periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty: the role of particulate wear debris. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 77A(September): 1448–1461, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mao, X.; Wong, A.; and Crawford, R.: Cobalt toxicity—an emerging clinical problem in patients with metal-on-metal hip prostheses? Med J Aust., 194(12): 649–51, 2011.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Murray, W. R., and Van Meter, J. W.: Surface replacement hip arthroplasty: results of the first seventy-four consecutive cases at the University of California, San Francisco. Hip: 156–66, 1982.

  34. Naal, F.; Maffiuletti, N.; Munzinger, U.; and Hersche, O.: Sports After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med., 35(5): 705–711, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Narvani, A.; Tsiridis, E.; Nwaboku, H.; and Bajekal, R.: Sporting activity following Birmingham hip resurfacing. Int J Sports Med., 27(6): 505–7, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Oldenburg, M.; Wegner, R.; and Baur, X.: Severe cobalt intoxication due to prosthesis wear in repeated total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty., 24(5): 825.e 15–20, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pazzaglia, U.; Apostoli, P.; Congiu, T.; Catalani, S.; Marchese, M.; and Zarattini, G.: Cobalt, chromium and molybdenum ions kinetics in the human body: data gained from a total hip replacement with massive third body wear of the head and neuropathy by cobalt intoxication. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg., 131(9): 1299–308, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rizzetti, M.; Liberini, P.; Zarattini, G.; Catalani, S.; Pazzaglia, U.; Apostoli, P.; and Padovani, A.: Loss of sight and sound. Could it be the hip? Lancet, 373(9668): 1052, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sandiford, N.; Muirhead-Allwood, S.; and Skinner, J.: Revision of failed hip resurfacing to total hip arthroplasty rapidly relieves pain and improves function in the early post operative period. J Orthop Surg Res., 5(1): 88, 2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schmalzried, T.: Metal–metal bearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics., 32(9): E-publication, 2009.

  41. Schmalzried, T. P.; Fowble, V. A.; and Amstutz, H. C.: The fate of pelvic osteolysis after reoperation. No recurrence with lesional treatment. Clin Orthop, (350): 128–37, 1998.

  42. Smith-Petersen, M.: Evolution of mould arthroplasty of the hip joint. J. Bone Joint Surg, 30 B: 59–75, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Steens, W.; von Foerster, G.; and Katzer, A.: Severe cobalt poisoning with loss of sight after ceramic–metal pairing in a hip—a case report. Acta Orthop., 77(5): 830–2, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Su, E.; Sheehan, M.; and Su, S.: Comparison of Bone Removed During Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Resurfacing or Conventional Femoral Component: A Cadaveric Study. J Arthroplasty Suppl, 25(2): 325–9, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tower, S.: Arthroprosthetic Cobaltism: Neurological and Cardiac Manifestations in Two Patients with Metal-on-Metal Arthroplasty: A Case Report. J Bone Joint Surg Am., 92(7): 2847–51, 2010.

  46. Treacy, R.; McBryde, C.; Shears, E.; and Pynsent, P.: Birmingham hip resurfacing: A MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP OF TEN YEARS. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 93(1): 27–33, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Vendittoli, P.; Lavigne, M.; Girard, J.; and Roy, A.: A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 88(8): 997–1002, 2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wera, G.; Gillespie, R.; Petty, C.; Petersilge, W.; Kraay, M.; and Goldberg, V.: Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 39(8): E78-83, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

One or more of the authors (HCA and MDL) certifies that he or she has or may receive payments or benefits from a commercial entity (Wright Medical Technology) related to this work. The institutions of the authors have received funding from Wright Medical Technology, Inc. In addition, funding for this study was provided by the Saint Vincent Medical Center Foundation, Los Angeles.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harlan C. Amstutz MD.

Additional information

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Study Level IV

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amstutz, H.C., Le Duff, M.J. Hip Resurfacing: a 40-Year Perspective. HSS Jrnl 8, 275–282 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-012-9293-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-012-9293-9

Keywords

Navigation