Abstract
Background
Saving bone by resurfacing the femoral head is not a new concept and the appeal for this type of hip replacement has remained despite the difficulties to find a bearing material suitable for this procedure.
Purpose
In this article, the unique experience of a surgeon who has been performing hip resurfacing since its early development is presented, along with a comparative analysis of the performance of successive designs.
Results
The overall 10-year Kaplan–Meier survivorship of the early designs with polyethylene bearings did not exceed 62% while that of the current Conserve®Plus metal-on-metal hybrid design implanted with second generation surgical technique is in excess of 92%. Further exceptional, in the 10-year survivorship, 99.7% has been achieved with femoral size of 46 mm and good bone quality. Cementless acetabular components provide better enduring fixation than cemented designs.
Discussion
Metal-on-metal is currently and fortunately the only highly successful bearing material that can combine low wear rates and the manufacturing of a thin acetabular component to preserve bone and still accommodate the large femoral head of a hip resurfacing. The adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) associated with metal-on-metal devices are not a bearing material issue per se but one of the device design and surgical technique. Almost all of ALTR and the rare events of systemic toxicity are due to abnormal wear patterns which can be prevented by proper acetabular component design and precise socket orientation in both the coronal and sagittal planes. Further improvements of the long-term durability with hip resurfacing can be anticipated with the use of recently developed trabecular bone-like tantalum or titanium porous coatings and with proper training of the surgeons interested in performing hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amstutz H, Beaulé P, Dorey F, Le Duff M, Campbell P, Gruen T: Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty—surgical technique. J Bone and Joint Surg, 88 A(suppl 1 part 2): 234–249, 2006.
Amstutz, H.; Grigoris, P.; and Dorey, F.: Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J Orthop Sci, 3(3): 169–86, 1998.
Amstutz, H., and Le Duff, M.: Background of metal-on-metal resurfacing. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H], 220(2): 85–94, 2006.
Amstutz, H., and Le Duff, M.: Evolution of hip resurfacing. In Hip Resurfacing: Principles, Indications, Technique and Results, pp. 1–15. Edited by Amstutz, H. C., 1–15, Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2008.
Amstutz, H.; Le Duff, M.; Campbell, P.; and Dorey, F.: The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus with a 3–9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 22(4): 481–9, 2007.
Amstutz, H. C.: Surface replacement arthroplasty. In Total Hip Arthroplasty, pp. 295–332. Edited by Amstutz, H. C., 295–332, New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1991.
Amstutz, H. C.; Campbell, P.; Kossovsky, N.; and Clarke, I. C.: Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. Clin Orthop, (276): 7–18, 1992.
Amstutz, H. C.; Campbell, P.; Nasser, S.; and Kossovsky, N.: Modes of failure of surface replacements. In Hip Arthroplasty, pp. 507–534. Edited by Amstutz, H. C., 507–534, New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1991.
Amstutz, H. C.; Clarke, I. C.; Christie, J.; and Graff-Radford, A.: Total hip articular replacement by internal eccentric shells: the tharies approach to total surface replacement arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, (128): 261–84., 1977.
Amstutz, H. C.; Sparling, E. A.; Grigoris, P.; Campbell, P. A.; and Dorey, F. J.: Surface replacement: the hip replacement of the future. Hip International, 8(4): 187–207, 1998.
Amstutz, H. C.; Takamura, K.; and Le Duff, M.: The effect of patient selection and surgical technique on the results of Conserve® Plus hip resurfacing—3.5- to 14-year follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am, I42(2): 133–42, 2011.
Ball, S.; Le Duff, M.; and Amstutz, H.: Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone and Joint Surg Am, 89: 735–41, 2007.
Banerjee, M.; Bouillon, B.; Banerjee, C.; Bäthis, H.; Lefering, R.; Nardini, M.; and Schmidt, J.: Sports activity after total hip resurfacing. Am J Sports Med., 38(6): 1229–36, 2010.
Beaulé, P.; Dorey, F.; and Le Duff, M.: Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85-A(12): 2288–93, 2003.
Beaulé, P.; Le Duff, M.; Campbell, P.; Dorey, F.; Park, S.; and Amstutz, H.: Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: A 7–10 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty, 19(12): 17–22, 2004.
Campbell, P.; Mirra, J.; and Amstutz, H. C.: Viability of femoral heads treated with resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 15(1):120–2, 2000.
Cooper, R. A.; McAllister, C. M.; Borden, L. S.; and Bauer, T. W.: Polyethylene debris-induced osteolysis and loosening in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. A cause of late failure. Journal of Arthroplasty, 7(3): 285–90, 1992.
De Haan, R.; Pattyn, C.; Gill, H.; Murray, D.; Campbell, P.; and De Smet, K.: Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 90(10): 1291–7, 2008.
Eswaramoorthy, V.; Biant, L.; and Field, R.: Clinical and radiological outcome of stemmed hip replacement after revision from metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 91(11): 1454–8, 2009.
Garbuz, D.; Tanzer, M.; Greidanus, N.; Masri, B.; and Duncan, C.: The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing versus Large-diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res., 468(2): 318–25, 2010.
Gruen, T.; Le Duff, M.; Wisk, L.; and Amstutz, H.: Prevalence and clinical relevance of radiographic signs of impingement in metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing. J Bone and Joint Surg Am., 93(16): 1519–26, 2011.
Head, W. C.: The Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am, 13(4): 789–97, 1982.
Ikeda, T.; Takahashi, K.; Kabata, T.; Sakagoshi, D.; Tomita, K.; and Yamada, M.: Polyneuropathy caused by cobalt–chromium metallosis after total hip replacement. Muscle Nerve 42(1): 140–3, 2010.
Jasty, M.; Bragdon, C.; Jiranek, W.; Chandler, H.; Maloney, W.; and Harris, W. H.: Etiology Of Osteolysis Around Porous-Coated Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasties. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 308(NOV): 111–126, 1994.
Jolley, M.; Salvati, E.; and Brown, G.: Early Results and Complications of Surface Replacement of the Hip. J Bone Joint Surg [AM], 64(3): 366–377, 1982.
Kumar, M.; Shetty, M.; Kiran, K.; and Kini, A.: Validation of navigation assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop., 36(1): 17–22, 2012.
Langton, D.; Jameson, S.; Joyce, T.; Gandhi, J.; Sidaginamale, R.; Mereddy, P.; Lord, J.; and Nargol, A.: Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 93(8): 1011–6, 2011.
Langton, D.; Sprowson, A.; Joyce, T.; Reed, M.; Carluke, I.; Partington, P.; and Nargol, A.: Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties. JBJS Br, 91(10): 1287–95, 2009.
Le Duff, M., and Amstutz, H. C.: Sporting activity after hip resurfacing: Changes over time. Orthop Clin North Am, 42(2): 161–7, 2011.
Mai, M. T.; Schmalzried, T. P.; Dorey, F. J.; Campbell, P. A.; and Amstutz, H. C.: The contribution of frictional torque to loosening at the cement–bone interface in Tharies hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78(4): 505–11, 1996.
Maloney, W. J., and Smith, R. L.: Periprosthetic osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty: the role of particulate wear debris. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 77A(September): 1448–1461, 1995.
Mao, X.; Wong, A.; and Crawford, R.: Cobalt toxicity—an emerging clinical problem in patients with metal-on-metal hip prostheses? Med J Aust., 194(12): 649–51, 2011.
Murray, W. R., and Van Meter, J. W.: Surface replacement hip arthroplasty: results of the first seventy-four consecutive cases at the University of California, San Francisco. Hip: 156–66, 1982.
Naal, F.; Maffiuletti, N.; Munzinger, U.; and Hersche, O.: Sports After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med., 35(5): 705–711, 2007.
Narvani, A.; Tsiridis, E.; Nwaboku, H.; and Bajekal, R.: Sporting activity following Birmingham hip resurfacing. Int J Sports Med., 27(6): 505–7, 2006.
Oldenburg, M.; Wegner, R.; and Baur, X.: Severe cobalt intoxication due to prosthesis wear in repeated total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty., 24(5): 825.e 15–20, 2009.
Pazzaglia, U.; Apostoli, P.; Congiu, T.; Catalani, S.; Marchese, M.; and Zarattini, G.: Cobalt, chromium and molybdenum ions kinetics in the human body: data gained from a total hip replacement with massive third body wear of the head and neuropathy by cobalt intoxication. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg., 131(9): 1299–308, 2011.
Rizzetti, M.; Liberini, P.; Zarattini, G.; Catalani, S.; Pazzaglia, U.; Apostoli, P.; and Padovani, A.: Loss of sight and sound. Could it be the hip? Lancet, 373(9668): 1052, 2009.
Sandiford, N.; Muirhead-Allwood, S.; and Skinner, J.: Revision of failed hip resurfacing to total hip arthroplasty rapidly relieves pain and improves function in the early post operative period. J Orthop Surg Res., 5(1): 88, 2010.
Schmalzried, T.: Metal–metal bearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics., 32(9): E-publication, 2009.
Schmalzried, T. P.; Fowble, V. A.; and Amstutz, H. C.: The fate of pelvic osteolysis after reoperation. No recurrence with lesional treatment. Clin Orthop, (350): 128–37, 1998.
Smith-Petersen, M.: Evolution of mould arthroplasty of the hip joint. J. Bone Joint Surg, 30 B: 59–75, 1948.
Steens, W.; von Foerster, G.; and Katzer, A.: Severe cobalt poisoning with loss of sight after ceramic–metal pairing in a hip—a case report. Acta Orthop., 77(5): 830–2, 2006.
Su, E.; Sheehan, M.; and Su, S.: Comparison of Bone Removed During Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Resurfacing or Conventional Femoral Component: A Cadaveric Study. J Arthroplasty Suppl, 25(2): 325–9, 2010.
Tower, S.: Arthroprosthetic Cobaltism: Neurological and Cardiac Manifestations in Two Patients with Metal-on-Metal Arthroplasty: A Case Report. J Bone Joint Surg Am., 92(7): 2847–51, 2010.
Treacy, R.; McBryde, C.; Shears, E.; and Pynsent, P.: Birmingham hip resurfacing: A MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP OF TEN YEARS. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 93(1): 27–33, 2011.
Vendittoli, P.; Lavigne, M.; Girard, J.; and Roy, A.: A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 88(8): 997–1002, 2006.
Wera, G.; Gillespie, R.; Petty, C.; Petersilge, W.; Kraay, M.; and Goldberg, V.: Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 39(8): E78-83, 2010.
Disclosures
One or more of the authors (HCA and MDL) certifies that he or she has or may receive payments or benefits from a commercial entity (Wright Medical Technology) related to this work. The institutions of the authors have received funding from Wright Medical Technology, Inc. In addition, funding for this study was provided by the Saint Vincent Medical Center Foundation, Los Angeles.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Study Level IV
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amstutz, H.C., Le Duff, M.J. Hip Resurfacing: a 40-Year Perspective. HSS Jrnl 8, 275–282 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-012-9293-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-012-9293-9