Cervical Radiculopathy: A Review
Cervical radiculopathy is defined as a syndrome of pain and/or sensorimotor deficits due to compression of a cervical nerve root. Understanding of this disease is vital for rapid diagnosis and treatment of patients with this condition, facilitating their recovery and return to regular activity.
This review is designed to clarify (1) the pathophysiology that leads to nerve root compression; (2) the diagnosis of the disease guided by history, physical exam, imaging, and electrophysiology; and (3) operative and non-operative options for treatment and how these should be applied.
The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles and these articles were reviewed by independent authors. The conclusions are presented in this manuscript.
Facet joint spondylosis and herniation of the intervertebral disc are the most common causes of nerve root compression. The clinical consequence of radiculopathy is arm pain or paresthesias in the dermatomal distribution of the affected nerve and may or may not be associated with neck pain and motor weakness. Patient history and clinical examination are important for diagnosis. Further imaging modalities, such as x-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and electrophysiologic testing, are of importance. Most patients will significantly improve from non-surgical active and passive therapies. Indicated for surgery are patients with clinically significant motor deficits, debilitating pain that is resistant to conservative modalities and/or time, or instability in the setting of disabling radiculopathy. Surgical treatment options include anterior cervical decompression with fusion and posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy.
Understanding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment indications, and treatment techniques is essential for rapid diagnosis and care of patients with cervical radiculopathy.
Keywordscervical radiculopathy disc herniation ACDF ADF posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy posterior cervical foraminotomy
- 5.Drake RL, Gray H. Gray’s atlas of anatomy. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.Google Scholar
- 6.Benzel EC. Spine surgery : techniques, complication avoidance, and management. 2005.Google Scholar
- 12.DeMyer W. Technique of the neurologic examination: a programmed text. 3 d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.Google Scholar
- 22.Aarabi B, Alexander M, Mirvis SE, et al. Predictors of outcome in acute traumatic central cord syndrome due to spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. Dec 17 2010.Google Scholar
- 29.Anonymous. Pain in the neck and arm: a multicentre trial of the effects of physiotherapy, arranged by the British Association of Physical Medicine. Br Med J. Jan 29 1966;1(5482):253–258.Google Scholar
- 44.Fessler RG, Sekhar LN. Atlas of neurosurgical techniques : spine and peripheral nerves. New York: Thieme; 2006.Google Scholar
- 48.Barlocher CB, Barth A, Krauss JK, Binggeli R, Seiler RW. Comparative evaluation of microdiscectomy only, autograft fusion, polymethylmethacrylate interposition, and threaded titanium cage fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: a prospective randomized study in 125 patients. Neurosurg Focus. Jan 15 2002;12(1):E4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 1993;75(9):1298–1307.Google Scholar
- 52.Watters WC, 3rd, Levinthal R. Anterior cervical discectomy with and without fusion. Results, complications, and long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Oct 15 1994;19(20):2343–2347.Google Scholar
- 58.McGuire KJ, Harrast J, Herkowitz H, Weinstein JN. Geographic Variation in the Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease: American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS) Quality Improvement Initiative; Part II Candidates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Feb 4 2011.Google Scholar
- 63.Jawahar A, Cavanaugh DA, Kerr EJ, 3 rd, Birdsong EM, Nunley PD. Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials. Spine J. Dec 2010;10(12):1043–1048.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 67.Coric D, Nunley PD, Guyer RD, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. Jun 24 2011.Google Scholar
- 71.Korinth MC, Kruger A, Oertel MF, Gilsbach JM. Posterior foraminotomy or anterior discectomy with polymethyl methacrylate interbody stabilization for cervical soft disc disease: results in 292 patients with monoradiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). May 15 2006;31(11):1207–1214; discussion 1215–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 73.Jagannathan J, Sherman JH, Szabo T, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA. The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years’ clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. Apr 2009;10(4):347–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar