HSS Journal

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 57–60 | Cite as

Challenges for Large Orthopaedic Hospitals Worldwide—An ISOC Position Statement

  • Patrick S. Sussmann
  • Beat R. Simmen
  • Joerg Goldhahn
  • ISOC participants
  • Thomas P. Sculco
Special Interest

Abstract

Since the foundation of the International Society of Orthopaedic Centers in 2006, the group has continued to grow, with currently 11 members worldwide. During the 2008 annual meeting, the bylaws and mission of the group were approved as well as the acceptance of two additional members. Strict inclusion criteria were established to keep the group both small and effective. The goal of the 2008 meeting and this position statement is to identify current challenges in both research and education for large-volume orthopedic hospitals and to discuss possible approaches and solutions.

References

  1. 1.
    Sculco TP, Klinghoffer IP. Global musculoskeletal health: inaugural meeting of the international society of orthopaedic centers. HSS J. 2009; 21: 24–26Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stucki G, Grimby G. Applying the ICF in medicine. J. Rehabil. Med. 2004; 44 (Suppl): 5–6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Simmen BR, Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Herren DB, Pap G, Aeschlimann A, Goldhahn J (2009) A concept for comprehensively measuring health, function and quality of life following orthopaedic interventions of the upper extremity. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 129(1):113–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Okike K, Kocher MS, Mehlman CT, Bhandari M (2007) Conflict of interest in orthopaedic research. An association between findings and funding in scientific presentations. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89–3:608–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhandari M, Jonsson A, Buhren V (2006) Conducting industry-partnered trials in orthopaedic surgery. Injury 37–4:361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kusuma SK, Mehta S, Sirkin M, Yates AJ, Miclau T, Templeton KJ, Friedlaender GE (2007) Measuring the attitudes and impact of the eighty-hour workweek rules on orthopaedic surgery residents. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89–3:679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedlaender GE (2006) The 80-hour duty week: rationale, early attitudes, and future questions. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 449:138–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zuckerman JD, Kubiak EN, Immerman I, Dicesare P (2005) The early effects of code 405 work rules on attitudes of orthopaedic residents and attending surgeons. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87–4:903–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peabody T (2006) The effect of work hour restrictions on the education of orthopaedic surgery residents. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 449:128–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baskies MA, Ruchelsman DE, Capeci CM, Zuckerman JD, Egol KA (2008) Operative experience in an orthopaedic surgery residency program: the effect of work-hour restrictions. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 90–4:924–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morshed S, Bhandari M (2008) Clinical trial design in fracture-healing research: meeting the challenge. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 90(Suppl 1):55–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M (2008) Design considerations for randomised trials in orthopaedic fracture surgery. Injury 39–6:696–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick S. Sussmann
    • 1
  • Beat R. Simmen
    • 1
  • Joerg Goldhahn
    • 1
  • ISOC participants
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
  • Thomas P. Sculco
    • 2
  1. 1.Schulthess KlinikZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Hospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Campbell ClinicGermantownUSA
  4. 4.Clinica Alemana de SantiagoSantiagoChile
  5. 5.Endo KlinikHamburgGermany
  6. 6.Instituto Nacional De RehabilitaciónMexico CityMexico
  7. 7.Instituto Ortopedico GaleazziMilanItaly
  8. 8.Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliBolognaItaly
  9. 9.Peking Union Medical College HospitalBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations