HSS Journal

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 129–136 | Cite as

A Simple Technique for Alignment in Total Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Technical Note and Preliminary Report

  • Manuel Villanueva-Martínez
  • Antonio Ríos-Luna
  • Ángel Villamor-Pérez
Original Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

The functioning and survival of hip resurfacing arthroplasty depends on correct positioning and alignment of the implant. Correct positioning of the femoral alignment wire with respect to the femoral neck is the key to avoiding complications. Although the surgeon must align the wire in two planes, we can only control one plane at a time without changing position or relying on the indications of an assistant. Independent placement of two parallel alignment wires, one for varus-valgus orientation and another for version orientation, will help to determine two planes, the valgus sagittal plane and the version coronal plane, at the intersection of which both the optimum point of entry into the femoral head and the orientation line of the femoral alignment wire can be established. The marks on the neck and head and Kirschner wires following these marks define the planes. This simple technique allows us to reduce surgery time, minimize errors, and speed up the learning curve. It can be used with any type of resurfacing arthroplasty.

Keywords

resurfacing alignment technique hip arthroplasty 

References

  1. 1.
    Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al., Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin. Orthop. 2007; 465: 63–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amstutz HC, Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, et al., Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 years. Results of 2- to 9-year follow-up. Clin. Orthop. 2007; 460: 159–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mc Minn DJ, Daniel J, Pynsent PB, Pradhan C, Mini-incision resurfacing arthroplasty of hip through the posterior approach. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005; 441: 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wirth CJ, Gosse F, Improved implantation technique for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. Oper. Orthop. Traumatol. 2006; 18: 214–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cobb JP, Kannan V, Brust K, et al., Navigation reduces the learning curve in resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 2007; 463: 90–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis ET, Gallie P, Macgroarty K, et al., The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. A cadaver study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 2007; 89: 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Seyler TM, Lai LP, Sprinkle DI, et al., Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2008; 90(S3): 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romanowski JR, Swank ML, Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: Avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2008; 90: 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL, Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2005; 36(2): 187–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Angling C, Masri B, Tonetti J, et al., Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement. Clin. Orthop. 2007; 465: 71–79.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al., Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing. A prospective cohort study. J. Arthroplasty. 2007; 22: 66–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shimmin AJ, Back D, Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2005; 87: 463–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vail TP, Glisson RR, Domínguez DE, et al., Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2008; 90: 1951–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis ET, Olsen M, Zdero R, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH, Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2008; 90: 1522–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Haan R, Campbell PA, Su EP, et al., Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. The influence of malpositioning of the components. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2008; 90: 1158–1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Long JP, Bartel DL, Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system. Clin. Orthop. 2006; 453: 115–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ong KL, Day JS, Kurtz SM, Field RE, Manley MT, Role of surgical position on interface stress and initial bone remodeling stimulus around hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.005.
  18. 18.
    Kim PR, Beaulé PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M, Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J. Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(6 Suppl 1): 44–49.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hart R, Sváb P, Filan P, Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2008; 128: 429–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krüger S, Zambelli PY, Leyvraz PF, et al., Computer-assisted placement technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: improvement in accuracy. Int. Orthop. (SICOT) 2009; 33(1): 27–33. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0440-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ganapathi M, Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Günther KP, Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2009; 467(5): 1341–1347. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0299-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Villanueva-Martínez
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Antonio Ríos-Luna
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ángel Villamor-Pérez
    • 2
  1. 1.Hospital General Universitario Gregorio MarañónMadridSpain
  2. 2.Hospital USP-San JoseMadridSpain
  3. 3.Hospital USP-Virgen del MarAlmeríaSpain
  4. 4.Departamento de Neurociencias y Ciencias de la SaludUniversidad de AlmeríaAlmeríaSpain
  5. 5.MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations