Abstract
Bilateral total knee replacement (BTKR) has been associated with a higher incidence of fat embolism (FES) compared to single knee replacement. Consequently, intraoperative monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been recommended. This study compares clinical outcome in BTKR patients monitored with central venous pressure versus PAC. A retrospective chart review of 249 consecutive patients undergoing BTKR, 132 of whom had PAC insertion versus 117 who had central line insertion, over a 1-year period were included in the study. Their medical records were reviewed for co-morbidities, baseline characteristics, and type of intraoperative monitoring. Need and duration for postoperative monitoring in the postoperative care, length of hospital stay (LOHS), signs of fat embolism, development of arrhythmias, and respiratory failure were all outcome measures. A total of four patients (1.6%) had FES as per Schonfeld criteria. One of these patients died within 48 h of surgery. They all had PAC monitoring intraoperatively. Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) remained unchanged during surgery which raises doubt as to the clinical utility and advisability of the use of PAC’s in this setting. There was no statistically significant difference in cardiac or pulmonary complications, or LOHS between the two groups. Central venous pressure monitoring appears to be sufficient in patients undergoing BTKR.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lachiewicz PF, Ranawat CS (1981) Fat embolism syndrome following bilateral total knee replacement with total condylar prosthesis: report of two cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 160:106–108
Morrey BF, Adams RA, Ilstrup DM et al (1987) Complications and mortality associated with bilateral or unilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69:484–488
Samii K, Elmelik E, Mourtada MB et al (1979) Intraoperative hemodynamic changes during total knee replacement. Anesthesiology 50:239–242
Dorr LD, Merkel C, Mellman MF et al (1989) Fat emboli in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Predictive factors for neurologic manifestations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:112–118 discussion 118–119
Dalen JE (2001) The pulmonary artery catheter—friend, foe, or accomplice? JAMA 286:348–350
Williams G, Grounds M, Rhodes A (2002) Pulmonary artery catheter. Curr Opin Crit Care 8:251–256
Schonfeld SA, Ploysongsang Y, DiLisio R et al (1983) Fat embolism prophylaxis with corticosteroids. A prospective study in high-risk patients. Ann Intern Med 99:438–443
Berman AT, Parmet JL, Harding SP et al (1998) Emboli observed with use of transesophageal echocardiography immediately after tourniquet release during total knee arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:389–396
Dorr LD, Udomkiat P, Szenohradszky J et al (2002) Intraoperative monitoring for safety of bilateral total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 396:142–151
Polanczyk CA, Rohde LE, Goldman L et al (2001) Right heart catheterization and cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: an observational study. JAMA 286:309–314
Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB et al (1988) Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 94:1176–1186
Boyd O, Grounds RM, Bennett ED (1993) A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients. JAMA 270:2699–2707
Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF et al (2003) A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 348:5–14
Arcasoy SM, Christie JD, Ferrari VA et al (2003) Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with advanced lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157:735–740
Kim WR, Krowka MJ, Plevak DJ, Lee J, Rettke SR, Frantz RP, Wiesner RH (2003) Accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of pulmonary hypertension in liver transplant candidates. Liver Transplant 6:453–458
Conflict of interest statement
No financial support was received for the completion of this study. None of the investigators have a conflict of interest related to the topic of the publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was funded by the Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
Ethical Board Review statement: the hospital institutional review board approved this human study and the study was performed according to ethical principles of research.
Level III: Retrospective Case Controlled Study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jules-Elysee, K.M., YaDeau, J.T. & Urban, M.K. Pulmonary Artery Versus Central Venous Catheter Monitoring in the Outcome of Patients Undergoing Bilateral Total Knee Replacement. HSS Jrnl 5, 27–30 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-008-9094-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-008-9094-3