HSS Journal

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 27–30 | Cite as

Pulmonary Artery Versus Central Venous Catheter Monitoring in the Outcome of Patients Undergoing Bilateral Total Knee Replacement

  • Kethy M. Jules-Elysee
  • Jacques T. YaDeau
  • Michael K. Urban
 

Abstract

Bilateral total knee replacement (BTKR) has been associated with a higher incidence of fat embolism (FES) compared to single knee replacement. Consequently, intraoperative monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been recommended. This study compares clinical outcome in BTKR patients monitored with central venous pressure versus PAC. A retrospective chart review of 249 consecutive patients undergoing BTKR, 132 of whom had PAC insertion versus 117 who had central line insertion, over a 1-year period were included in the study. Their medical records were reviewed for co-morbidities, baseline characteristics, and type of intraoperative monitoring. Need and duration for postoperative monitoring in the postoperative care, length of hospital stay (LOHS), signs of fat embolism, development of arrhythmias, and respiratory failure were all outcome measures. A total of four patients (1.6%) had FES as per Schonfeld criteria. One of these patients died within 48 h of surgery. They all had PAC monitoring intraoperatively. Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) remained unchanged during surgery which raises doubt as to the clinical utility and advisability of the use of PAC’s in this setting. There was no statistically significant difference in cardiac or pulmonary complications, or LOHS between the two groups. Central venous pressure monitoring appears to be sufficient in patients undergoing BTKR.

References

  1. 1.
    Lachiewicz PF, Ranawat CS (1981) Fat embolism syndrome following bilateral total knee replacement with total condylar prosthesis: report of two cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 160:106–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morrey BF, Adams RA, Ilstrup DM et al (1987) Complications and mortality associated with bilateral or unilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69:484–488Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samii K, Elmelik E, Mourtada MB et al (1979) Intraoperative hemodynamic changes during total knee replacement. Anesthesiology 50:239–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dorr LD, Merkel C, Mellman MF et al (1989) Fat emboli in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Predictive factors for neurologic manifestations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:112–118 discussion 118–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dalen JE (2001) The pulmonary artery catheter—friend, foe, or accomplice? JAMA 286:348–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Williams G, Grounds M, Rhodes A (2002) Pulmonary artery catheter. Curr Opin Crit Care 8:251–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schonfeld SA, Ploysongsang Y, DiLisio R et al (1983) Fat embolism prophylaxis with corticosteroids. A prospective study in high-risk patients. Ann Intern Med 99:438–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berman AT, Parmet JL, Harding SP et al (1998) Emboli observed with use of transesophageal echocardiography immediately after tourniquet release during total knee arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:389–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dorr LD, Udomkiat P, Szenohradszky J et al (2002) Intraoperative monitoring for safety of bilateral total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 396:142–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Polanczyk CA, Rohde LE, Goldman L et al (2001) Right heart catheterization and cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: an observational study. JAMA 286:309–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB et al (1988) Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 94:1176–1186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boyd O, Grounds RM, Bennett ED (1993) A randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients. JAMA 270:2699–2707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF et al (2003) A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 348:5–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arcasoy SM, Christie JD, Ferrari VA et al (2003) Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with advanced lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157:735–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim WR, Krowka MJ, Plevak DJ, Lee J, Rettke SR, Frantz RP, Wiesner RH (2003) Accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of pulmonary hypertension in liver transplant candidates. Liver Transplant 6:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kethy M. Jules-Elysee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jacques T. YaDeau
    • 1
  • Michael K. Urban
    • 1
  1. 1.Hospital for Special SurgeryWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations