One- Versus Two-Incision Technique for Distal Biceps Tendon Repair
- 118 Downloads
There are several techniques that have been described for distal biceps tendon repair but there is still controversy regarding the optimal technique. Our hypothesis is that the single-incision technique will have a similar complication rate and functionally equivalent restoration of function compared with the two-incision approach. A retrospective review of consecutive biceps tendon repairs was performed at one institution over a 5-year period. Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criteria and 26 were available for follow-up including subjective assessment, physical examination, and strength testing. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach utilized: 12 patients underwent single-incision repair and 14 had a two-incision repair. The average follow-up was 33 months (minimum 13; maximum 75). There were no statistically significant differences in regards to flexion strength or endurance, supination strength or endurance, or complication rates between the two techniques. In conclusion, both surgical techniques led to adequate restoration of strength with a low complication rate. Both techniques are safe to perform and should be guided by surgeon comfort with the approach.
- 3.Morrey BF (2000) Injury of the flexors of the elbow: biceps in tendon injury. The elbow and its disorders, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 468–478Google Scholar
- 14.Meherin JM, Kilgore ESJ (1960) The treatment of ruptures of the distal biceps brachii tendon. Am J Surgery 82:290–292Google Scholar
- 15.Boyd H, Anderson L (1961) A method of reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 43:1041–1043Google Scholar
- 25.Hoppenfeld S, de Boer P (1994) Surgical exposures in orthopaedics: the anatomic approach. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 26.Morrey BF (1994) Masters techniques in orthopaedic surgery—the elbow. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar