HSS Journal

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 48–54 | Cite as

Total Hip Arthroplasty is Less Painful at 12 Months Compared with Hemiarthroplasty in Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture

  • William Macaulay
  • Kate W. Nellans
  • Richard Iorio
  • Kevin L. Garvin
  • William L. Healy
  • Melvin P. Rosenwasser
  • DFACTO Consortium



The Displaced Femoral (neck fracture) Arthroplasty Consortium for Treatment and Outcomes (DFACTO) study compared total hip arthroplasty (THA) to hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures.


This study was designed as a prospective, randomized clinical trial.


The study was conducted in five US academic and private medical centers.


Patients were composed of independent, mentally competent individuals, >50 years old who suffered a displaced femoral neck fracture without existing arthritis at the hip. Forty-one patients were enrolled.

Main outcome measures

Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed at 6 and 12 months post-fracture using the SF-36, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Harris Hip Score, and the Timed “Up & Go” Test (TUG test).


Groups were equivalent at baseline in terms of age, comorbid conditions, and functional status. At 6 months, there were no significant differences between the groups using the outcome measures or overall rates of complications. There was one dislocation in the THA group (5.8% of patients). At 12 months, the THA group reported significantly less pain (53.2 ± 10.2) than the hemiarthroplasty group (42.4 ± 11.5) using the SF-36 (p = 0.02). Using the TUG Test, we observed a greater proportion of THA patients remain functionally independent 1 year after surgery compared the hemiarthroplasty group (p = 0.08, controlling for age and sex).


These differences in pain and functional outcomes suggest THA is a viable treatment option for the active elderly displaced femoral neck fracture population.

Key words

displaced femoral neck fracture total hip arthroplasty hemiarthroplasty pain functional outcomes 


  1. 1.
    Stevens, J, Hasbrouck LM, Durant TM, et al. (1999) Surveillance for injuries and violence among older adults. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 48:27–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schneider, E., Guralnik JM (1990) The aging of America-impact on health care costs. JAMA 263:2335–2340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Magaziner, J, Fredman L, Hawkes W, Hebel JR, Zimmerman S, Orwig DL, Wehren L (2003) Changes in Functional Status Attributable to Hip Fracture: A Comparison of Hip Fracture Patients to Community-dwelling Aged. Am J Epidemiol 157(11):1023–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu-Yao, G, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE (1994) Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. JBJs 76(A)(1):15–25Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keating, J, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF (2006) Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. JBJS 88A(2’):249–260Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ravikumar, K, Marsh G (2000) Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur—13 year results of a prospective randomized study. Injury 31(10):793–797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodriguez-Merchan, E (2002) Displaced Intracapsular Hip Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty or Total Arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 399:72–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papandrea, R, Froimson MI (1996) Total hip arthroplasty after acute displaced femoral neck fracture. Am J Orthop 25:85–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kofoed, H., Kofod, J (1983) Moore prosthesis in the treatment of fresh femoral neck fractures. A critical review with special attention to secondary acetabular degeneration. Injury 14:531–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Healy, W, Iorio R (2004) Total Hip Arthoplasty: Optimal Treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop 429:42–48Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garden, R (1961) Low-Angele Fixation in Fractures of the Femoral Neck. JBJA 43B(4):647–663Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Folstein, M, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bellamy, N (1989) Pain assessment in osteoarthritis, experience with WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2(supplement 2):14–17Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beaton D, Schemitsch E (2003) Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function. Clin Orthop 413:90–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McHorney, C, Ware Jr JE, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Lu JF (1992) The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 309 (supplement 5):247–263Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lyons, R, Perry HM, Littlepage BN (1994) Evidence for the validity of the Short-form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age Ageing 23(3):182–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Podsiadlo, D, Richardson, S (1991) The Timed “Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility of frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okumiya, K, Matsubayashi K, Nakamura T, Fujisawa M, Osaki Y, Doi Y, Ozawa T (1999) The timed “Up & Go” test and manual button score are useful predictors of functional decline in basic and instrumental ADL in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 47(4):497–498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bischoff, H, Stahelin HB, Monsch AU, Iversen MD, Weyh A, von Dechend M, Akos R, Conzelmann M, Dick W, Theiler R (2003) Identifying a cut-off point for normal mobility: a comparison of the timed ‘up and go’ test in community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly women. Age Ageing 32(3):315–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harris, W (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. JBJS(A) 51(4):737–755Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wolinsky, F, Fitzgerald JF, Stump TE (1997) The effect of hip fracture on mortality, hospitalization, and functional status: a prospective study. Am J Public Health 87(3):398–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raia, F, Chapman CB, Herrera MF, Schweppe MW, Michelsen CB, Rosenwasser MP (2003) Unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly? Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:259–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bhandari, M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd, Swiontkowski MF, Berry DJ, Haidukewych G, Schemitsch EH, Hanson BP, Koval K, Dirschl D, Leece P, Keel M, Petrisor B, Heetveld M, Guyatt GH (2005) Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. JBJS 87A(9):2122–2130Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blomfeldt, R., Tornkvist H, Ponzer S, Soderqvist A, Tidermark J (2005) Comparison of internal fixation with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures. Randomized, controlled trial performed at four years. JBJS 87A(8):1680–1688Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Macaulay
    • 1
  • Kate W. Nellans
    • 4
  • Richard Iorio
    • 3
  • Kevin L. Garvin
    • 2
  • William L. Healy
    • 3
  • Melvin P. Rosenwasser
    • 5
  • DFACTO Consortium
  1. 1.Center of Hip and Knee ReplacementColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Orthopaedic Surgery and RehabilitationUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryLahey ClinicBurlingtonUSA
  4. 4.Doris Duke Clinical ResearchColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Orthopaedic Hand and Trauma ServiceColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations