Similar Analgesic Effect After Popliteal Fossa Nerve Blockade with 0.375% and 0.75% Bupivacaine

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that increasing the concentration of bupivacaine from 0.375 to 0.75% would increase the duration of postoperative analgesia by 3 h. Seventy patients scheduled for hospital admission after foot or ankle surgery gave consent to enter this prospective randomized trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a popliteal fossa block (posterior approach) using 30 cc of either 0.375% or 0.75% bupivacaine, with epinephrine. Patients also received a neuraxial anesthetic and postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Patient characteristics, duration of analgesia, pain scores, use of analgesic medications, and side effects of analgesic therapy were determined. Duration of analgesia was similar with both concentrations of bupivacaine (0.375% 14 ± 8 h, 0.75% 13 ± 6 h; mean ± SD). Pain scores were the same for both groups on the first postoperative day (3 of 10 at rest, 5 with therapy). Analgesic use and side effects attributable to pain management did not differ between groups. In conclusion, postoperative analgesia was not affected by the concentration of bupivacaine used for the nerve block. There was no benefit to increasing the concentration of bupivacaine above 0.375% for single-injection popliteal fossa nerve blockade when performed for postoperative analgesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Cooper J, Benirschke S, Sangeorzan B, et al. (2004) Sciatic nerve blockade improves early postoperative analgesia after open repair of calcaneus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18:197–201

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rongstad K, Mann RA, Prieskorn D, et al. (1996) Popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative analgesia. Foot Ankle Int 17:378–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Casati A, Fanelli G, Borghi B, et al. (1999) Ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine for lower limb peripheral nerve blocks. Study Group on Orthopedic Anesthesia of the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Intensive Care. Anesthesiology 90:1047–1052

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mulroy MF, Larkin K. L, Batra MS, et al. (2001) Femoral nerve block with 0.25% or 0.5% bupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia following outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med 26:24–29

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Connolly C, Coventry DM, Wildsmith JA (2001) Double-blind comparison of ropivacaine 7.5 mg ml(−1) with bupivacaine 5 mg ml(−1) for sciatic nerve block. Br J Anaesth 86:674–677

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Greengrass RA, Klein SM, D’Ercole FJ, et al. (1998) Lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block for knee arthroplasty: comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine. Can J Anaesth 45:1094–1096

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hadzic A, Vloka JD (1998) A comparison of the posterior versus lateral approaches to the block of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Anesthesiology 88:1480–1486

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Krone SC, Chan VW, Regan J, et al. (2001) Analgesic effects of low-dose ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block for outpatient shoulder surgery—a dose-finding study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 26:439–443

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wang RD, et al. (2002) Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 97:959–965

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Casati A, Magistris L, Fanelli G, et al. (2000) Small-dose clonidine prolongs postoperative analgesia after sciatic-femoral nerve block with 0.75% ropivacaine for foot surgery. Anesth Analg 91:388–392

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Casati A, Borghi B, Fanelli G, et al. (2002) A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block. Anesth Analg 94:987–990

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Taboada M, Cortes J, Rodriguez J, et al. (2003) Lateral approach to the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa: a comparison between 1.5% mepivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 28:516–520

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Triado VD, Crespo MT, Aguilar JL, et al. (2004) A comparison of lateral popliteal versus lateral midfemoral sciatic nerve blockade using ropivacaine 0.5%. Reg Anesth Pain Med 29:23–27

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Benzon HT, Kim C, Benzon HP, et al. (1997) Correlation between evoked motor response of the sciatic nerve and sensory blockade. Anesthesiology 87:547–552

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Department of Anesthesiology Research and Education Fund and approved by the Hospital for Special Surgery Institutional Review Board.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques T. Ya Deau MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ya Deau, J.T., Wukovits, B.U., LaSala, V.R. et al. Similar Analgesic Effect After Popliteal Fossa Nerve Blockade with 0.375% and 0.75% Bupivacaine. HSS Jrnl 3, 173–176 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-007-9052-5

Download citation

Key words

  • analgesia
  • nerve block
  • dose–response relationship