HSS Journal

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 127–129 | Cite as

A Comparison of the PCL-Retaining AGC and Posterior Stabilizing Legacy Prostheses for Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Philip M. Faris
  • Merrill A. Ritter
  • Thomas J. Aleto
  • Andrew L. Pierce
Original Paper


  1. 1.
    Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES (2004) The rates of osteolysis and loosening associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement. Results at five to fourteen years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A(3):525–530Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Worland RL, Johnson GV, Alemparte J, Jessup DE, Keenan J, Norambuena N (2002) Ten to fourteen year survival and functional analysis of the AGC total knee replacement system. Knee. May 9(2):133–137. Erratum in: Knee. 2003 Sep 10(3):303. Johnson Gonzalo [corrected to Johnson Gonzalo Vazquez-Vela]Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL, Head WC (2000) The AGC total knee prosthesis at average 11 years. J Arthroplasty 15(4):ReviewCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ritter MA, Berend ME, Meding JB, Keating EM, Faris PM, Crites BM (2001) Long-term followup of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (388):51–57Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alemparte J, Cabezas A, Azocar O, Hernandez R, Acevedo M (2003) Mid-term results of an AGC total knee arthroplasty system survival and function analysis: 2- to 8-year follow-up results. J Arthroplasty 18(4):420–425 JunPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly MA, Clarke HD (2002) Long-term results of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (404):51–57 NovGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Becker MW, Insall JN, Faris PM (1991) Bilateral total knee arthroplasty. One cruciate retaining and one cruciate substituting. Clin Orthop Relat Res (271):122–124 OctGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark CR, Rorabeck CH, MacDonald S, MacDonald D, Swafford J, Cleland D (2001) Posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining total knee replacement: a randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (392):208–212 NovGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maruyama S, Yoshiya S, Matsui N, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M (2004) Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(3):349–353 AprPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hirsch HS, Lotke PA, Morrison LD (1994) The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute? Clin Orthop Relat Res (309):64–68 DecGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conditt MA, Noble PC, Bertolusso R, Woody J, Parsley BS (2004) The PCL significantly affects the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19(7 Suppl 2):107–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tanzer M, Smith K, Burnett S (2002) Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap. J Arthroplasty 17(7):813–819 OctPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip M. Faris
    • 1
  • Merrill A. Ritter
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Aleto
    • 1
  • Andrew L. Pierce
    • 1
  1. 1.The Center for Hip and Knee SurgeryMooresvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations