Justice and Health Care in the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Coping with a chronic disease is a formidable challenge. Owing to the disabling consequences of their underlying conditions, individuals who suffer with a chronic rheumatic disease have especially daunting lives with their existence often dominated by their health-related needs. Due to the high prevalence, the demographic distribution, indeed the very nature of the rheumatic diseases, too many sufferers of these conditions in our society remain disenfranchised with respect to their access to health care. Those who come from already disadvantaged socioeconomic circumstances face particularly difficult challenges. Rheumatologists and their allied health professionals, therefore, have a moral obligation to ensure greater fairness to their patients—those already compromised by the natural lottery that gave them their disease. To enhance the appreciation of this problem and to motivate the rheumatic disease community, we attempt to identify those variables that create the need for and imperil access to medical care for the rheumatic diseases. The implications of these observations are then explored from the ethical perspective of justice. We conclude with suggestions as to how to change the health care system to address these problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    National Arthritis Action Plan: A Public Health Strategy. Arthritis Foundation, Association of State and Territorial Health Official, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (1999)

  2. 2.

    InstitutionalAuthorNameCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (1994) ArticleTitleArthritis prevalence and activity limitation—United States, 1990 Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 43 433–438

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    RC Lawrence CG Helmick FC Arnett et al. (1998) ArticleTitleEstimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States Arthritis Rheum 1 788–799

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    LF Callahan EH Yelin (2001) The social and economic consequences of rheumatic disease Primer on the rheumatic diseases EditionNumber12 Arthritis Foundation Atlanta, Geo

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Healthy People 2010. Understanding and improving health, Department of Health and Human Services 2000

  6. 6.

    Charlson ME, Allegrante JP, Robbins L Socioeconomic differentials in arthritis and its treatment. In: Rogers DE, Ginzberg E (eds) Medical Care and the Health of the Poor: Cornell University Medical College Eight Conference on Health Policy. Boulder, Co: Westview Press, 1993, pp. 77–89

  7. 7.

    L Cunningham L Kelsey (1984) ArticleTitleEpidemiology of musculoskeletal impairments and associated disability Am J Public Health 74 574–579 Occurrence Handle6232862

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    JP Leigh J Freis (1991) ArticleTitleOccupation, income and education as independent covariates of arthritis in four national probability samples Arthritis Rheum 34 984–995 Occurrence Handle1859493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    R Mitchell R Burkhauser T Pincus (1988) ArticleTitleThe importance of age, education and comorbidity in the substantial earnings loss of individuals with symmetric polyarthritis Arthritis Rheum 31 348–357 Occurrence Handle3358799

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    T Pincus JM Mitchell RV Burkhauser (1989) ArticleTitleSubstantial work disability and earnings loss in individuals less than 65 with osteoarthritis: comparisons with rheumatoid arthritis J Clin Epidemiol 42 449–457 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0895-4356(89)90135-2 Occurrence Handle2732773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    InstitutionalAuthorNameCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (1994) ArticleTitleArthritis prevalence and activity limitations—United States, 1990 MMWR 43 433–438

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    CG Helmick RC Lawrence RA Pollard et al. (1995) ArticleTitleArthritis and other rheumatic conditions: who is affected now, who will be affected later. National Arthritis Data Workgroup Arthritis Care Res 8 203–211 Occurrence Handle8605258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Final report of the White House Commission on complementary and alternative medicine policy. Appendix G. March 10, 2002. http://www.whccamp.hhs.gov/sfc.html

  14. 14.

    VA Blake JP Allegrante L Robbins C Mancuso et al. (2002) ArticleTitleRacial differences in social network experience and perceptions of benefit of arthritis treatments among New York City Medicare beneficiaries with self-reported hip and knee pain Arthritis Rheum 47 366–371 Occurrence Handle10.1002/art.10538 Occurrence Handle12209481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    MG Peterson JP Hellenberg TP Szatrowski NA Johanson et al. (1992) ArticleTitleGeographic variations in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States J Bone Joint Surg Am 74-A IssueID10 1530–1539

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    F Hoaglund C Oishi G Gialamas (1995) ArticleTitleExtreme variations in racial rates of total hip arthroplasty for primary coxarthrosis: a population-based study in San Francisco Ann Rheum Dis 54 107–110 Occurrence Handle7702396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    A Escalante R Espinosa-Morales I Rincon Particledel RA Arroyo et al. (2000) ArticleTitleRecipients of hip replacement for arthritis are less likely to be Hispanic, independent of access to health care and socioeconomic status Arth Rheum 43 390–399 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1529-0131(200002)43:2<390::AID-ANR20>3.0.CO;2-R

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    GS Alarcon G McGwin AA Bartolucci J Roseman J Lisse et al. (2001) ArticleTitleSystemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups: IX. Differences in damage accrual Arth Rheum 12 2797–2806 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1529-0131(200112)44:12<2797::AID-ART467>3.0.CO;2-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    MM Ward (2001) ArticleTitleExamining health disparities in systemic lupus erythematosus Arthritis Reum 12 2711–2714 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1529-0131(200112)44:12<2711::AID-ART457>3.0.CO;2-#

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    JE Balow (2002) ArticleTitleChoosing treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis Arth Rheum 46 IssueID8 1981–1983 Occurrence Handle10.1002/art.10466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    T Pincus A Gibofsky M Weinblatt (2002) ArticleTitleUrgent care and tight control of rheumatoid arthritis as in diabetes and hypertension: Better treatments but a shortage of rheumatologists Arth Rheum 46 851–854 Occurrence Handle10.1002/art.10202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    T Harrington MB Walsh (2003) ArticleTitleAn alternative perspective on treatment for diabetes, hypertension, and rheumatoid arthritis: comment on the editorial by Pincus et al Arth Rheum 48 573–584 Occurrence Handle10.1002/art.10742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    N Daniels (1985) Just health care Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    J Rawls (1971) A theory of justice Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry. Consumer Bill of Rights and Responsibilities: report to the President of the United States (1997)

  26. 26.

    GJ Annas (1998) ArticleTitleA national bill of patients’ rights NEJM 338 695–699 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199803053381020 Occurrence Handle9487001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    JJ Fins (2003) ArticleTitleLegislating evidence-based cancer care Oncologist 8 128–131 Occurrence Handle10.1634/theoncologist.8-2-128 Occurrence Handle12697937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    JF Fries C Carey DJ McShane (1997) ArticleTitlePatient education in arthritis: randomized controlled trial of a mail-delivered program J Rheum 24 1378–1383 Occurrence Handle9228140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    J Goeppinger M Anderson C Macnee K Stewart (1990) The dissemination of the Bone-Upon Arthritis Home Study Program: continued examination of the effect of arthritis self-care education Arthritis Foundation Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    J Goeppinger C Macnee S Wilson M Boutaugh (1995) Bone up on arthritis home study (“stand alone” version) for persons with arthritis: continued examination of the effects o arthritis self-care education Arthritis Foundation Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fins JJ, Peres J, Schumacher JD (2003) On the road from theory to practice: progressing towards seamless palliative care. Last Acts National Program Office, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Washington, DC

  32. 32.

    D Shipton EM Bradley AA Bookman GA Hawker (2002) ArticleTitleBarriers to providing adequate rheumatology care: implications from a survey of rheumatologists in Ontario, Canada J Rheum 29 2420–2425 Occurrence Handle12415603

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by a grant from The Fan Fox and Leslie R. Samuels Foundation to the Division of Medical Ethics of the Weill Medical College of Cornell University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Ronald MacKenzie.

Additional information

The opinions expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of organizations with which they are affiliated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacKenzie, C.R., Miller, F.G. & Fins, J.J. Justice and Health Care in the Rheumatic Diseases. HSS Jrnl 1, 58–63 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-005-0108-0

Download citation

Key words

  • rheumatic disease
  • disability
  • access to health care
  • justice