Skip to main content
Log in

Solid-phase extraction based on cation-exchange sorbents followed by liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry to determine synthetic cathinones in urine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cathinone derivates have become very popular as legal highs and are easily obtained on the market as “bath salts”, getting around the legislation due to their modified structure based on banned substances. The aim of this project is to evaluate two mixed-mode cation-exchange sorbents in solid-phase extraction (SPE) and their efficacy in pretreating urine samples for the determination of synthetic cathinones by liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS).

Methods

A method for determining a group of eleven trending synthetic cathinones in urine using SPE followed by LC-HRMS using Orbitrap as analyser was developed and validated.

Results

In the extraction step, two different cation-exchange sorbents were evaluated and compared, a weak one (Oasis WCX) and a strong one (Oasis MCX). Better results were obtained for Oasis MCX in terms of recoveries and matrix effects (lower, if a clean-up step was applied). Method quantification limits were set at 0.2 ng mL−1 and method detection limits were between 0.04 and 0.16 ng mL−1.

Conclusions

The results obtained enabled the studied compounds to be quantified at the usual levels at which they are present in urine samples. Moreover, these limits were lower than the ones found in the literature using similar extraction strategies, which shows that the reported strategy can be a useful tool in forensic and toxicological analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), World Drug Report 2017 (2017). https://www.unodc.org/wdr2017/field/Booklet_2_HEALTH.pdf

  2. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), World Drug Report 2017 (2017). https://www.unodc.org/wdr2017/field/Booklet_4_ATSNPS.pdf

  3. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction and Europol (2016) EU Drug Markets Report: In-depth analysis, 2016. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/2373/TD0216072ENN.PDF

  4. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction and Europol (2015) New psychoactive substances in Europe. EU Early Warn Syst. https://doi.org/10.2810/372415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Valente MJ, Guedes De Pinho P, De Lourdes BM et al (2014) Khat and synthetic cathinones: a review. Arch Toxicol 88:15–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-013-1163-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. US Drug Enforcement Administration (2017) Drugs of abuse 2017 edition: a DEA resource guide. US Dep Justice 94. https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/drug_of_abuse.pdf

  7. Hong WY, Ko YC, Lin MC et al (2016) Determination of synthetic cathinones in urine using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques. J Anal Toxicol 40:12–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkv108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baciu T, Borrull F, Neusüß C et al (2016) Capillary electrophoresis combined in-line with solid-phase extraction using magnetic particles as new adsorbents for the determination of drugs of abuse in human urine. Electrophoresis 37:1232–1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201500515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Concheiro M, Anizan S, Ellefsen K, Huestis MA (2013) Simultaneous quantification of 28 synthetic cathinones and metabolites in urine by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:9437–9448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7386-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Concheiro M, Castaneto M, Kronstrand R, Huestis MA (2015) Simultaneous determination of 40 novel psychoactive stimulants in urine by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry and library matching. J Chromatogr A 1397:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.04.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fontanals N, Marcé RM, Borrull F (2017) Solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry to determine synthetic cathinones in different types of environmental water samples. J Chromatogr A 1524:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.10.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paul M, Ippisch J, Herrmann C et al (2014) Analysis of new designer drugs and common drugs of abuse in urine by a combined targeted and untargeted LC-HR-QTOFMS approach. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:4425–4441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-7825-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Glicksberg L, Bryand K, Kerrigan S (2016) Identification and quantification of synthetic cathinones in blood and urine using liquid chromatography-quadrupole/time of flight (LC-Q/TOF) mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 1035:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.09.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Strickland EC, Cummings OT, Mellinger AL, McIntire GL (2018) Development and validation of a novel all-inclusive LC–MS–MS designer drug method. J Anal Toxicol 43:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bky087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Borova VL, Gago-Ferrero P, Pistos C, Thomaidis NS (2015) Multi-residue determination of 10 selected new psychoactive substances in wastewater samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta 144:592–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.06.080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Montesano C, Vannutelli G, Piccirilli V et al (2017) Application of a rapid μ-SPE clean-up for multiclass quantitative analysis of sixteen new psychoactive substances in whole blood by LC–MS/MS. Talanta 167:260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.02.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadland SE, Levy S (2016) Objective testing: urine and other drug tests. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 25:549–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2016.02.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Institóris L, Árok Z, Seprenyi K et al (2015) Frequency and structure of stimulant designer drug consumption among suspected drug users in Budapest and South-East Hungary in 2012–2013. Forensic Sci Int 248:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.01.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baciu T, Borrull F, Calull M, Aguilar C (2016) Enantioselective determination of cathinone derivatives in human hair by capillary electrophoresis combined in-line with solid-phase extraction. Electrophoresis 37:2352–2362. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201600149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Majchrzak M, Celiński R, Kuś P et al (2017) The newest cathinone derivatives as designer drugs: an analytical and toxicological review. Forensic Toxicol 36:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-017-0385-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Namera A, Kawamura M, Nakamoto A et al (2015) Comprehensive review of the detection methods for synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones. Forensic Toxicol 33:175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-015-0270-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Montesano C, Vannutelli G, Massa M et al (2016) Multi-class analysis of new psychoactive substances and metabolites in hair by pressurized liquid extraction coupled to HPLC-HRMS. Drug Test Anal 9:798–807. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fernández P, Regenjo M, Ares A et al (2019) Simultaneous determination of 20 drugs of abuse in oral fluid using ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction. Anal Bioanal Chem 411:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1428-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohr S, Weiß JA, Spreitz J, Schmid MG (2012) Chiral separation of new cathinone- and amphetamine-related designer drugs by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using trifluoroacetyl-l-prolyl chloride as chiral derivatization reagent. J Chromatogr A 1269:352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.09.079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fowble KL, Shepard JRE, Musah RA (2018) Identification and classification of cathinone unknowns by statistical analysis processing of direct analysis in real time-high resolution mass spectrometry-derived “neutral loss” spectra. Talanta 179:546–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.11.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kerrigan S, Savage M, Cavazos C, Bella P (2016) Thermal degradation of synthetic cathinones: implications for forensic toxicology. J Anal Toxicol 40:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkv099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohr S, Pilaj S, Schmid MG (2012) Chiral separation of cathinone derivatives used as recreational drugs by cyclodextrin-modified capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 33:1624–1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201100570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pérez-Alcaraz A, Borrull F, Aguilar C, Calull M (2019) Enantioselective determination of cathinones in urine by high pressure in-line SPE-CE. Electrophoresis 40:1762–1770. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201900072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Perera RWH, Abraham I, Gupta S et al (2012) Screening approach, optimisation and scale-up for chiral liquid chromatography of cathinones. J Chromatogr A 1269:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.11.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ambach L, Redondo H, Angerer V (2015) Detection and quantification of 56 new psychoactive substances in whole blood and urine by LC–MS/MS. Bioanalysis 7:1119–1136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ellefsen KN, Concheiro M, Huestis MA (2016) Synthetic cathinone pharmacokinetics, analytical methods, and toxicological findings from human performance and postmortem cases. Drug Metab Rev 48:237–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2016.1188937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chambers EE, Woodcock MJ, Wheaton JP et al (2014) Systematic development of an UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of tricyclic antidepressants in human urine. J Pharm Biomed Anal 88:660–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.09.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Guan F, Uboh CE, Soma LR et al (2013) Detection, quantification, and identification of dermorphin in equine plasma and urine by LC–MS/MS for doping control. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:4707–4717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6907-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Laboratory and Scientific Section (2009) Guidance for the validation of analytical methodology and calibration of equipment used for testing of illicit drugs in seized materials and biological specimens: a commitment to quality and continuous improvement. https://www.unodc.org/documents/scientific/validation_E.pdf

  35. (2002) EC/96/23 COMMISSION DECISION of 12 August 2002 implementing Council Directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. 29. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32002D0657&from=EN

  36. Bade R, Bijlsma L, Sancho JV et al (2017) Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry determination of synthetic cathinones and phenethylamines in influent wastewater of eight European cities. Chemosphere 168:1032–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Colas C, Garcia P, Popot M-A et al (2008) Optimization of solid-phase extraction for the liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of harpagoside, 8-para-coumaroyl harpagide, and harpagide in equine plasma and urine. J Chromatogr Sci 46:174–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Glicksberg L, Kerrigan S (2018) Stability of synthetic cathinones in urine. J Anal Toxicol 42:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkx091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, the Agencia Estatal de Investigación and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (Project: CTQ2017-88548-P) for the financial support given.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carme Aguilar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pascual-Caro, S., Fontanals, N., Borrull, F. et al. Solid-phase extraction based on cation-exchange sorbents followed by liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry to determine synthetic cathinones in urine. Forensic Toxicol 38, 185–194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-019-00508-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-019-00508-8

Keywords

Navigation