Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of the role played by n-propanol in distinction of ethanol source in postmortem blood with the assistance of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 13 January 2020

Abstract

Purpose

Concentration ratio of ethanol/n-propanol has been employed to distinguish the source of ethanol in postmortem blood, though its reliability remains controversial.

Methods

Forty-two postmortem human blood samples with ethanol levels in the range of 0.07–4.64 mg/mL were investigated. Ethanol and n-propanol were determined by head-space gas chromatography coupled with flame ionization detection, while ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) were determined by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry.

Results

EtG and EtS were both negative in 26% of the investigated postmortem blood samples and 11% of n-propanol-negative postmortem samples, indicating that n-propanol was not a reliable marker of putrefaction. It was also found that the ratio of ethanol/n-propanol (supposed to be < 20 without antemortem ethanol consumption) was unreliable by showing great individual differences and was opposite with the result of EtG and EtS in at least 17% of n-propanol-positive postmortem blood samples. Meanwhile, 140 antemortem blood samples were investigated, as an aid to estimate the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) at the time of death for postmortem samples with ethanol both from postmortem formation and antemortem consumption. By comparing with the maximum or minimum value of EtG and EtS concentration under certain BAC in antemortem samples, the BAC range at the moment of death could be estimated in 93% of postmortem samples.

Conclusions

The present study proved that n-propanol was not a reliable marker for either putrefaction or ethanol source distinction by showing considerable false rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Girasek DC, Gielen AC, Smith GS (2002) Alcohol’s contribution to fatal injuries: a report on public perceptions. Ann Emerg Med 39:622–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Snijder M, Calabria B, Dobbins T, Knight A, Shakeshaft A (2018) A need for tailored programs and policies to reduce rates of alcohol-related crimes for vulnerable communities and young people: an analysis of routinely collected police data. Alcohol Alcohol 53:578–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tindall J, Groombridge D, Wiggers J, Gillham K, Palmer D, Clinton-McHarg T, Lecathelinais C, Miller P (2016) Alcohol-related crime in city entertainment precincts: public perception and experience of alcohol-related crime and support for strategies to reduce such crime. Drug Alcohol Rev 35:263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carfora A, Campobasso CP, Cassandro P, Petrella R, Borriello R (2018) Alcohol and drugs use among drivers injured in road accidents in Campania (Italy): a 8-year retrospective analysis. Forensic Sci Int 288:291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gomez-Restrepo C, Gomez-Garcia MJ, Naranjo S, Rondon MA, Acosta-Hernandez AL (2014) Alcohol consumption as an incremental factor in health care costs for traffic accident victims: evidence in a medium sized Colombian city. Accid Anal Prev 73:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kelly AT, Mozayani A (2012) An overview of alcohol testing and interpretation in the 21st century. J Pharm Pract 25:30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kugelberg FC, Jones AW (2007) Interpreting results of ethanol analysis in postmortem specimens: a review of the literature. Forensic Sci Int 165:10–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Flanagan RJ, Connally G (2005) Interpretation of analytical toxicology results in life and at postmortem. Toxicol Rev 24:51–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Leikin JB, Watson WA (2003) Post-mortem toxicology: what the dead can and cannot tell us. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 41:47–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moriya F, Ishizu H (1994) Can microorganisms produce alcohol in body cavities of a living person?: a case report. J Forensic Sci 39:883–888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoiseth G, Karinen R, Christophersen A, Morland J (2010) Practical use of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in postmortem cases as markers of antemortem alcohol ingestion. Int J Legal Med 124:143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vezzoli S, Bernini M, De Ferrari F (2015) Ethyl glucuronide in vitreous humor and blood postmortem specimens: analysis by liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry and interpreting results of neo-formation of ethanol. Ann Ist Super Sanita 51:19–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ziavrou K, Boumba VA, Vougiouklakis TG (2005) Insights into the origin of postmortem ethanol. Int J Toxicol 24:69–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krabseth H, Morland J, Hoiseth G (2014) Assistance of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in the interpretation of postmortem ethanol findings. Int J Legal Med 128:765–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nanikawa R, Ameno K, Hashimoto Y, Hamada K (1982) Medicolegal studies on alcohol detected in dead bodies—alcohol levels in skeletal muscle. Forensic Sci Int 20:133–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nanikawa R, Kotoku S (1974) Medicolegal observations on a dead body drawn up from the sea bed, with special reference to ethanol and diatoms. Forensic Sci 3:225–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Takayasu T, Ohshima T, Tanaka N, Maeda H, Kondo T, Nishigami J, Nagano T (1995) Postmortem degradation of administered ethanol-d6 and production of endogenous ethanol: experimental studies using rats and rabbits. Forensic Sci Int 76:129–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boumba VA, Economou V, Kourkoumelis N, Gousia P, Papadopoulou C, Vougiouklakis T (2012) Microbial ethanol production: experimental study and multivariate evaluation. Forensic Sci Int 215:189–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boumba VA, Kourkoumelis N, Gousia P, Economou V, Papadopoulou C, Vougiouklakis T (2013) Modeling microbial ethanol production by E. coli under aerobic/anaerobic conditions: applicability to real postmortem cases and to postmortem blood derived microbial cultures. Forensic Sci Int 232:191–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Felby S, Nielsen E (1993) Postmortem blood alcohol concentration. Blutalkohol 30:244–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liang H, Kuang S, Guo L, Yu T, Rao Y (2016) Assessment of the role played by n-propanol found in postmortem blood in the discrimination between antemortem consumption and postmortem formation of ethanol using rats. J Forensic Sci 61:122–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoiseth G, Karinen R, Christophersen AS, Olsen L, Normann PT, Morland J (2007) A study of ethyl glucuronide in post-mortem blood as a marker of ante-mortem ingestion of alcohol. Forensic Sci Int 165:41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schloegl H, Rost T, Schmidt W, Wurst FM, Weinmann W (2006) Distribution of ethyl glucuronide in rib bone marrow, other tissues and body liquids as proof of alcohol consumption before death. Forensic Sci Int 156:213–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Baranowski S, Serr A, Thierauf A, Weinmann W, Grosse PM, Wurst FM, Halter CC (2008) In vitro study of bacterial degradation of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate. Int J Leg Med 122:389–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoiseth G, Karinen R, Johnsen L, Normann PT, Christophersen AS, Morland J (2008) Disappearance of ethyl glucuronide during heavy putrefaction. Forensic Sci Int 176:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoiseth G, Kristoffersen L, Larssen B, Arnestad M, Hermansen NO, Morland J (2008) In vitro formation of ethanol in autopsy samples containing fluoride ions. Int J Leg Med 122:63–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Halter CC, Laengin A, Al-Ahmad A, Wurst FM, Weinmann W, Kuemmerer K (2009) Assessment of the stability of the ethanol metabolite ethyl sulfate in standardised degradation tests. Forensic Sci Int 186:52–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hegstad S, Kristoffersen L, Liane VH, Spigset O (2017) EtG and EtS in autopsy blood samples with and without putrefaction using UPLC–MS-MS. J Anal Toxicol 41:107–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang H, Li BX, Wang FL, Chang J, Zhang YF, Rao YL (2019) Determination of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in human whole blood and vitreous humor by LC–MS/MS and applications to the interpretation of postmortem ethanol findings. J Anal Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkz082

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jones AW (2000) Medicolegal alcohol determination—blood- or breath-alcohol concentration? Forensic Sci Rev 12:23–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Neal CL, Poklis A (1996) Postmortem production of ethanol and factors that influence interpretation: a critical review. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 17:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Canfield DV, Kupiec T, Huffine E (1993) Postmortem alcohol production in fatal aircraft accidents. J Forensic Sci 38:914–917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Winek CL, Winek CL, Wahaba WW (1995) The role of trauma in postmortem blood alcohol determination. Forensic Sci Int 71:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cabarcos P, Alvarez I, Tabernero MJ, Bermejo AM (2015) Determination of direct alcohol markers: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:4907–4925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoiseth G, Morini L, Polettini A, Christophersen A, Morland J (2009) Blood kinetics of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulphate in heavy drinkers during alcohol detoxification. Forensic Sci Int 188:52–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang X, Zheng F, Lin Z, Johansen SS, Yu T, Liu Y, Huang Z, Li J, Yan J, Rao Y (2017) Simultaneous determination of ethanol’s four types of non-oxidative metabolites in human whole blood by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 963:68–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharma P, Bharat V, Murthy P (2015) Quantitation of ethyl glucuronide in serum and urine by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Indian J Med Res 141:75–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu Y, Zhang X, Li J, Huang Z, Lin Z, Wang J, Zhang C, Rao Y (2018) Stability of ethyl glucuronide, ethyl sulfate, phosphatidylethanols and fatty acid ethyl esters in postmortem human blood. J Anal Toxicol 42:346–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Helander A, Dahl H (2005) Urinary tract infection: a risk factor for false-negative urinary ethyl glucuronide but not ethyl sulfate in the detection of recent alcohol consumption. Clin Chem 51:1728–1730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bosma PJ, Chowdhury JR, Bakker C, Gantla S, de Boer A, Oostra BA, Lindhout D, Tytgat GN, Jansen PL, Oude Elferink RP (1995) The genetic basis of the reduced expression of bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 in Gilbert’s syndrome. N Eng J Med 333:1171–1175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Technical Standards Special Projects (no. 17DZ22204100) and National Key R&D Program of China (no. 2017YFC0803504-2).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hao Wang and Jiaolun Li contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China

    Hao Wang, Jiaolun Li, Zhibin Huang & Yulan Rao

  2. Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing, 100038, People’s Republic of China

    Fanglin Wang, Yunfeng Zhang & Jing Chang

Authors
  1. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiaolun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhibin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fanglin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yunfeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jing Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yulan Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yulan Rao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Use of blood samples in this study was approved by Ethics Committee of School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Li, J., Huang, Z. et al. Assessment of the role played by n-propanol in distinction of ethanol source in postmortem blood with the assistance of ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate. Forensic Toxicol 38, 195–202 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-019-00507-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-019-00507-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation