Skip to main content
Log in

Time-course measurements of drugs and metabolites transferred from fingertips after drug administration: usefulness of fingerprints for drug testing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated whether a fingerprint, which consists of secretions from the fingertips, is a suitable biological sample for drug testing. A commercially available cold medicine containing ibuprofen, dihydrocodeine, chlorpheniramine, and methylephedrine was administered to healthy subjects. The subjects washed their hands with tap water and hand soap to remove the external contaminants, and then pressed a fingertip onto wet filter paper at fixed sampling times (from 2 h to 7 days). The analytes on the filter paper were dissolved in 25 % methanol–water, and a large volume (50 μl) of the extract was analyzed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The relationship between the sampling times and the concentration of analytes in fingerprints was examined. The results were compared with drug concentrations in blood samples. Most of the drugs and their metabolites were detected from fingerprints at 7 days after drug administration. The fingerprint sample preparation is rapid (ca. 3 min) and simple, and the limits of detection were 0.1 pg/fingerprint for dihydrocodeine, chlorpheniramine, and methylephedrine. We demonstrate that drugs can be detected in fingerprints at later sampling times with more rapid and simpler sample preparation than in blood. The method should be applicable to drug testing in criminal investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Galton F (1892) Finger prints. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee HC, Gaensslen R (2001) Advances in fingerprint technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bush DM (2008) The US mandatory guidelines for federal workplace drug testing programs: current status and future considerations. Forensic Sci Int 174:111–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes AJ, Smith ML, Kacinko SL, Schwilke EW, Cone EJ, Moolchan ET, Huestis MA (2008) Excretion of methamphetamine and amphetamine in human sweat following controlled oral methamphetamine administration. Clin Chem 54:172–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rowell F, Hudson K, Seviour J (2009) Detection of drugs and their metabolites in dusted latent fingermarks by mass spectrometry. Analyst 134:701–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clemons K, Wiley R, Waverka K, Fox J, Dziekonski E, Verbeck GF (2013) Direct analyte-probed nanoextraction coupled to nanospray ionization-mass spectrometry of drug residues from latent fingerprints. J Forensic Sci 58:875–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ifa DR, Manicke NE, Dill AL, Cooks RG (2008) Latent fingerprint chemical imaging by mass spectrometry. Science 321(5890):805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradshaw R, Wolstenholme R, Blackledge RD, Clench MR, Ferguson LS, Francese S (2011) A novel matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging based methodology for the identification of sexual assault suspects. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 25:415–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goucher E, Kicman A, Smith N, Jickells S (2009) The detection and quantification of lorazepam and its 3-O-glucuronide in fingerprint deposits by LC–MS/MS. J Sep Sci 32:2266–2272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng PH, Walker S, Tahtouh M (2009) Detection of illicit substances in fingerprints by infrared spectral imaging. Anal Bioanal Chem 394:2039–2048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hazarika P, Jickells SM, Russell DA (2009) Rapid detection of drug metabolites in latent fingermarks. Analyst 134:93–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuwayama K, Tsujikawa K, Miyaguchi H, Kanamori T, Iwata YT, Inoue H (2013) Time-course measurements of caffeine and its metabolites extracted from fingertips after coffee intake: a preliminary study for the detection of drugs from fingerprints. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:3945–3952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson RD, Botch-Jones SR (2013) The stability of four designer drugs: MDPV, mephedrone, BZP and TFMPP in three biological matrices under various storage conditions. J Anal Toxicol 37:51–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu G, Ji QC, Jemal M, Tymiak AA, Arnold ME (2011) Approach to evaluating dried blood spot sample stability during drying process and discovery of a treated card to maintain analyte stability by rapid on-card pH modification. Anal Chem 83:9033–9038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee D, Milman G, Schwope DM, Barnes AJ, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA (2012) Cannabinoid stability in authentic oral fluid after controlled cannabis smoking. Clin Chem 58:1101–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Coulter C, Garnier M, Moore C (2012) Analysis of tetrahydrocannabinol and its metabolite, 11-nor-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid, in oral fluid using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol 36:413–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Momoh P, Fandino A, Aisawa E, Schlabach T, Miller K, Stafford G (2010) Technical overview: iFunnel technology for enhanced sensitivity in tandem LC/MS. Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara

    Google Scholar 

  18. Romanelli A, Olson L, Biesenthal T, Ghobarah H (2012) Technical note: the AB SCIEX Triple Quad™ 6500 system for bioanalysis—a new level of sensitivity. AB SCIEX, Framingham

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jenkins TJ (2010) FPRW seminar: advanced MS technologies for residue screening and quantitation. Waters, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  20. Watanabe J, Hike H, Yasumoto M, Horie S, Bando Y (2008) Scientific posters: evaluation of column retentivity with large injection volume for high sensitive and high-throughput LC–MS/MS quantitative analysis. Imtakt, Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clemons K, Wiley R, Waverka K, Fox J, Dziekonski E, Verbeck GF (2013) Direct analyte-probed nanoextraction coupled to nanospray ionization-mass spectrometry of drug residues from latent fingerprints. J Forensic Sci 58:875–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bradshaw R, Rao W, Wolstenholme R, Clench MR, Bleay S, Francese S (2012) Separation of overlapping fingermarks by matrix assisted laser desorption ionisation mass spectrometry imaging. Forensic Sci Int 222:318–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hazarika P, Jickells SM, Wolff K, Russell DA (2010) Multiplexed detection of metabolites of narcotic drugs from a single latent fingermark. Anal Chem 82:9150–9154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gilchrist E, Smith N, Barron L (2012) Probing gunshot residue, sweat and latent human fingerprints with capillary-scale ion chromatography and suppressed conductivity detection. Analyst 137:1576–1583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Benton M, Chua MJ, Gu F, Rowell F, Ma J (2010) Environmental nicotine contamination in latent fingermarks from smoker contacts and passive smoking. Forensic Sci Int 200:28–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (24790649) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Kuwayama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuwayama, K., Yamamuro, T., Tsujikawa, K. et al. Time-course measurements of drugs and metabolites transferred from fingertips after drug administration: usefulness of fingerprints for drug testing. Forensic Toxicol 32, 235–242 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-014-0228-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-014-0228-7

Keywords

Navigation