Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of mercury and arsenic in ecstasy tablets by electrochemical methods

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mercury and arsenic concentrations were determined in ecstasy tablets, which were obtained from different police seizures in Spain, by electrochemical techniques; mercury by differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry with a rotating gold disk electrode, and arsenic by cathodic stripping voltammetry in the differential pulse mode with a hanging mercury drop electrode. The performance of the procedures was compared with cold-vapor atomic absorption spectrometry for mercury, and with electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry for arsenic. The procedures were applied to the determination of both elements in nine ecstasy samples; mercury was the element present in higher concentrations, ranging from 0.05 to 1.23 mg/kg, while the range of arsenic concentrations was 0.04–0.49 mg/kg. The described electrochemical techniques for determination of mercury and arsenic in ecstasy tablets should be useful for impurity profiling in forensic analysis practice, because of their low costs and high sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (1973) Evaluation of certain food additives and the contaminations of mercury, lead and cadmium. Technical Report Series No. 505. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (1999) Food additives and contaminants 53rd Meeting, Rome, 1-10 June

  3. Johannesson M (2002) A review of risks associated to arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, and zinc (Appendix A, p 62). In: Johannesson M et al (eds) The market implication of integrated management for heavy metals flows for bioenergy use in the European Union. Kalmar (Sweden), Kalmar University Department of Biology and Environmental Science

    Google Scholar 

  4. Comment S, Lock E, Zingg C, Jakob A (2001) The analysis of ecstasy tablets by ICP/MS and ICP/AES. Probl Forensic Sci 46:131–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li H, Smart RB (1996) Determination of sub-nanomolar concentration of arsenic (III) in natural waters by square wave cathodic stripping voltammetry. Anal Chim Acta 325:25–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kotoucek M, Vasicova J, Ruzicka J (1993) Determination of arsenic by cathodic stripping voltammetry at a hanging mercury drop electrode. Mikrochim Acta 111:55–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Massart DL, Vandeginste BGM, Buydens LMC, De Jong S, Lewi PI, Smeyers-Verbeke J (1997) Handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics: part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 410

    Google Scholar 

  8. Massart DL, Vandeginste BGM, Buydens LMC, De Jong S, Lewi PI, Smeyers-Verbeke J (1997) Handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics: part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 193

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Deban.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fierro, I., Deban, L., Pardo, R. et al. Determination of mercury and arsenic in ecstasy tablets by electrochemical methods. Forensic Toxicol 24, 70–74 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-006-0017-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11419-006-0017-z

Keywords

Navigation