Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of byakujutsu (Atractylodes rhizome) and sojutsu (Atractylodes lancea rhizome) on anti-inflammatory and immunostimulative effects in vitro

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Natural Medicines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Japanese Pharmacopoeia defines byakujutsu (Atractylodes rhizome) as the rhizome of Atractylodes japonica or A. macrocephala and sojutsu (Atractylodes lancea rhizome) as the rhizome of A. lancea, A. chinensis, or their interspecific hybrids. Because their pharmaceutical uses differ in traditional Japanese Kampo medicine and traditional Chinese medicine, with less apparent scientific evidence, we compared the pharmacological properties between byakujutsu and sojutsu. Crude drug specimens of byakujutsu (n = 40) and sojutsu (n = 49) obtained in markets were identified by their species using DNA profiling. Their pharmacological properties were evaluated by the inhibitory effect of a MeOH extract of the samples on nitric oxide (NO) production by lipopolysaccharide-stimulated murine macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells and by the inducing effect of boiling water extract of the samples on granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) secretion from murine normal colonic epithelial MCE301 cells. We authenticated A. macrocephala (n = 8), A. japonica (n = 35), and the hybrid between A. macrocephala and A. japonica (n = 1), and they were used as byakujutsu. We authenticated A. chinensis (n = 25), A. lancea (n = 14), and the hybrid between A. chinensis and A. lancea (n = 6), and they were used as sojutsu. The inhibitory effects of byakujutsu on NO production were significantly higher than those of sojutsu (P < 0.05). This activity of A. japonica rhizome was significantly higher than that of A. macrocephala rhizome and A. lancea rhizome (P < 0.01). The activity of A. chinensis rhizome was significantly higher than that of A. lancea rhizome (P < 0.05). The extract of A. japonica rhizome significantly induced G-CSF secretion from MCE301 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. These effects of byakujutsu samples were not significantly different from those of sojutsu samples. A. japonica rhizome had significantly higher activity than A. macrocephala rhizome; however, there were no statistically significant differences among A. japonica, A. chinensis, and A. lancea. The pharmacological differences of byakujutsu and sojutsu may not be large among highly variated crude drug samples with average values, and quality control with the identification of the original plant species of byakujutsu and sojutsu may guarantee their pharmacological properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Regulatory Science Society of Japan (2016) Japanese pharmacopoeia (JP XVII), 17th edn. Jiho, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bensky D, Clavey S, Stoger E (2004) Chinese herbal medicine: materia medica, 3rd edn. Eastland Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hamada Y, Kosodo T (1993) Iyaku Shinnohonzokyo. Tsukiji Syokan, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  4. Japan Kampo Medicine Association Academic Devision (1990) Shokanzatsubyoron. Toyo Gakujutsu Shuppannsha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshimasu T (2007) Yakucho. Taniguchi Bookstore, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  6. Orita M, Nakanishi Y, Abe H, Maeda K, Higashino H (2000) The pharmacological studies of the differences between soujutsu-goreisan and byakujutsu-goreisan−the regulating system of body water. J Trad Med 17:115–121

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yamaoka Y, Kawakita T, Oukubo T, Tajima S (2008) Effects of extracts of byakutsu (Atractylodes rhizome) and sojutsu (Atractylodes lances rhizome) on small intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes. Igaku to Seibutsugaku 152:277–285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Murayama C, Wang CC, Michihara S, Norimoto H (2014) Pharmacological effects of “Jutsu” (Atractylodis rhizome and Atractylodis lanceae rhizome) on 1-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI)-induced head twitch response in mice (I). Molecules 19:14979–14986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo Y, Kondo K, Terabayashi S, Yamamoto Y, Shimada H, Fujita M, Kawasaki T, Maruyama T, Goda Y, Mizukami H (2006) DNA authentication of So-jutsu (Atractylodes lancea rhizome) and Byaku-jutsu (Atractylodes rhizome) obtained in the market based on the nucleotide sequence of the 18S-5.8S rDNA internal transcribed spacer region. J Nat Med 60:146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jang MH, Shin MC, Kim YJ, Kim CJ, Kim Y, Kim EH (2004) Atractylodes japonica suppresses lipopolysaccharide-stimulated expressions of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Biol Pharm Bull 27:324–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Atsumi T, Iwashita A, Ohtsuka I, Kakiuchi N, Sasaki Y, Mikage M, Toriizuka K (2013) Effect of Atractylodes lancea rhizoma on inflammatory mediator production from the using RAW264 macrophage cell line. J Trad Med 30:124–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen LG, Jan YS, Tsai PW, Norimoto H, Michihara S, Murayama C, Wang CC (2016) Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive constituents of Atractylodes japonica Koidzumi. J Agric Food Chem 64:2254–2262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsumoto T, Moriya M, Kiyohara H, Tabuchi Y, Yamada H (2010) Hochuekkito, a Kampo (traditional Japanese herbal) medicine, and its polysaccharide portion stimulate G-CSF secretion from intestinal epithelial cells. eCAM 7:331–340

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kondo K, Shiba M, Yotsuyanagi Y, Nishimura N, Maruyama T, Goda Y (2009) Authentication of So-jutsu (Atractylodes lancea rhizome) and Byaku-jutsu (Atractylodes rhizome) based on PCR-RFLP analysis for nrDNA and ITS region. J Jpn Bot 84:356–359

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tabuchi Y, Ohta S, Arai Y, Kawahara M, Ishibashi K, Sugiyama N, Horiuchi T, Furusawa M, Obinata M, Fuse H, Takeguchi N, Asano S (2000) Establishment and characterization of a colonic epithelial cell line MCE301 from transgenic mice harboring temperature-sensitive simian virus 40 large T-antigen gene. Cell Struct Func 25:297–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. The Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission (2015) Pharmacopoeia of the People Republic of China, 2015th edn. China Medical Science Press, Beijin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li CQ, He LC, Jin JQ (2007) Atractylenolide I and atractylenolide III inhibit lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-α and NO production in macrophages. Phytother Res 21:347–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sghaier MB, Harizi H, Louhichi T, Krifa M, Ghedira K, Chekir-Ghedira L (2011) Anti-inflammatory and antiulcerogenic activities of leaf extracts and sesquiterpene from Teucrium ramosissimum (Lamiaceae). Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 33:656–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ji GQ, Chen RQ, Zheng JX (2014) Macrophage activation by polysaccharides from Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz through the nuclear factor-kappaB pathway. Pharma Biol 53:512–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morstyn G, Campbell L, Souza LM, Alton NK, Keech J, Green M, Sheridan W, Metcalf D, Fox R (1988) Effect of granulocyte colony stimulating factor on neutropenia induced by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Lancet 8587:667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kano R, Mitani K (2009) Importance of discrimination among Kampo formulation for prescriptions. phil Kampo 25:3–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiaki Makino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimato, Y., Ota, M., Asai, K. et al. Comparison of byakujutsu (Atractylodes rhizome) and sojutsu (Atractylodes lancea rhizome) on anti-inflammatory and immunostimulative effects in vitro. J Nat Med 72, 192–201 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11418-017-1131-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11418-017-1131-4

Keywords

Navigation