Skip to main content
Log in

Systematic Quantitative Literature Review on Criminological Theories in Asia

  • Published:
Asian Journal of Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 25 January 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Empirical work on criminological theories in Asia has been increasing. However, few comprehensive and systematic reviews on the application of criminological theories in Asia have been conducted. Using a systematic quantitative literature review method on peer-reviewed English-language journal articles, we aim to provide an overview of the use of five major criminological theories in Asia: (1) strain; (2) social learning; (3) control; (4) routine activity; and (5) developmental and life-course. In particular, we address the following four questions: (1) how often are these theories tested in which region of Asia?; (2) what methodology is used to test these theories?; (3) to what extent are these theories supported in the Asian context?; and (4) what cultural uniqueness in the Asian context is taken into account in testing these theories, and what role and effect do they play in analysis and outcome? Findings indicate that the relationship between these theories and the Asian regions is skewed; many studies do not employ rigorous methodologies; these theories are either fully or partially supported in the Asian context; and only a few studies have analyzed the cultural uniqueness of the Asian context, and no effect of cultural uniqueness of the Asian context was found. Research implications for developing criminology in Asia are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 25 January 2018

    Due to an oversight during typesetting, the original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The second author’s name is Chen-Fu Pai, not Cheng-Fu Pai. The original article has been corrected.

Notes

  1. While Taiwan is not listed as an Asian country in the UNSD list, we decided to include it because numerous empirical studies have been conducted independently in Taiwan (Hebenton and Jou 2013).

  2. Asterisk (*) indicates a wildcard. Note that the wildcard in the Criminal Justice Abstracts is “?”.

  3. This includes studies that employed mixed methods.

  4. For this reason, the number of the journal articles and the total sum of “fully supported,” “partially supported,” and “not supported” are not consistent.

  5. Consistent with the previous section, this includes studies with mixed methods.

  6. Although the definition of harmony is not clear, Liu (2016, p. 215) considers it important in the Asian context where a high value is placed upon “group/relationship harmony, conflict avoidance, self-sacrifice, and compromise when personal interests are harmed or personal conflict arises.”

References

  • Agnew, R. (2015). Using general strain theory to explain crime in Asian societies. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(2), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9198-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonaccio, O., & Botchkovar, E. V. (2016). What international research has told us about criminological theory. In A. R. Piquero (Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 475–496). Surrey: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, E. P., & Arnio, A. N. (2016). Macro-level theory: a critical component of criminological exploration. In A. R. Piquero (Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 445–474). Surrey: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J. (2016). Asian criminology’s expansion and advancement of research and crime control practices. Asian Journal of Criminology, 11(4), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-016-9240-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2014). Crime in Asia: toward a better future. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-013-9176-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, R., & Liu, J. (2004). Introduction: crime, law and criminology in China. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1375/000486504323020256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K. (2017). Asian criminology and southern epistemologies. In J. Liu, M. Travers, & L. Y. C. Chang (Eds.), Comparative criminology in Asia (pp. 61–69). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., & Wilcox, P. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of criminological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dien, D. S.-f. (1983). Big me and little me: a Chinese perspective on self. Psychiatry, 46(3), 281–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H., & McNeill, F. (2017). Desistance: envisioning futures. In P. Carlen & L. A. França (Eds.), Alternative criminologies (pp. 433–451). London: Routledge.

  • Hebenton, B., & Jou, S. (2005). In search of criminological tradition: the development of criminology in Taiwan. Crime, Law and Social Change, 44(3), 215–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-005-9002-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebenton, B., & Jou, S. (2013). Taiwan’s criminological “footprint”—a review and analysis of english-language publication trends for Taiwan and selected Asian comparators (2000-2010). International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 37(2), 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., & Shahidullah, S. M. (2008). Global-local nexus and the emerging field of criminology and criminal justice in South Asia: Bangladesh case. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 5(2), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S., & Lambert, E. G. (2012). Introduction: social control in Asian countries. Asian Journal of Criminology, 7(2), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-012-9125-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S., Land, K. C., & Wang, J. (2013). Social ties, collective efficacy and perceived neighborhood property crime in Guangzhou, China. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8(3), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-013-9167-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, H. J. (2015). Crime and criminal justice in South Korea: editor’s introduction. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-015-9209-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karstedt, S. (2001). Comparing cultures, comparing crime: challenges, prospects and problems for a global criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 36(3), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012223323445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karstedt, S. (2012). Comparing justice and crime across cultures. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt, & S. F. Messner (Eds.), The sage handbook of criminological research methods (pp. 373–389). Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, T. (2013). Diversity witin an Asian country: Japanese criminal justice and criminology. In J. Liu, B. Hebenton, & S. Jou (Eds.), Handbook of Asian criminology (pp. 213–222). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Laidler, K. J. (2013). Doing criminology from the periphery: crime and punishment in Asia. Theoretical Criminology, 17(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480613476790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, B., & Lu, H. (2006). Conducting fieldwork in China: observations on collecting primary data regarding crime, law, and the criminal justice system. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986206286918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2007). Developing comparative criminology and the case of China: an introduction. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X06295774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2009). Asian criminology—challenges, opportunities, and directions. Asian Journal of Criminology, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-009-9066-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2016). Asian paradigm theory and access to justice. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216656681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2017a). The Asian criminological paradigm and how it links global north and south: combining an extended conceptual toolbox from the north with innovative Asian contexts. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6(1), 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2017b). The new Asian paradigm: a relational approach. In J. Liu, M. Travers, & L. Y. C. Chang (Eds.), Comparative criminology in Asia (pp. 17–32). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Hebenton, B., & Jou, S. (2013). Progress of Asian criminology: editors’ introduction. In J. Liu, B. Hebenton, & S. Jou (Eds.), Handbook of Asian criminology (pp. 1–9). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Travers, M., & Chang, L. Y. C. (2017). Reflecting on comparison: a view from Asia. In J. Liu, M. Travers, & L. Y. C. Chang (Eds.), Comparative criminology in Asia (pp. 185–201). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, I. H., & Enzmann, D. (2012). The generalizability of self-control theory. In J. Junger-Tas, I. H. Marshall, D. Enzmann, M. Killias, M. Steketee, & B. Gruszczynska (Eds.), The many faces of youth crime: contrasting theoretical perspectives on juvenile delinquency across countries and cultures (pp. 285–325). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E., & Newburn, T. (Eds.). (2010). The sage handbook of criminological theory. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mei, J., & Wang, M. (2007). Social change, crime, and criminology in China. Crime & Justice International, 23(97), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F. (2014). Social institutions, theory development, and the promise of comparative criminological research. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-013-9175-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, S. F. (2015). When west meets east: generalizing theory and expanding the conceptual toolkit of criminology. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9197-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa, S. (1997). The enigma of Japan as a testing ground for cross-cultural criminological studies. In D. Nelken (Ed.), Comparing legal cultures (pp. 195–214). Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornatowski, G. K. (1996). Confucian ethics and economic development: a study of the adaptation of Confucian values to modern Japanese economic ideology and institutions. Journal of Socio-Economics, 25(5), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(96)90018-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2013). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(3), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, C., Grignon, J., Steven, R., Guitart, D., & Byrne, J. (2015). Publishing not perishing: how research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1756–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R. (Ed.). (2016). The handbook of criminological theory. Surrey: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi, D., & Kawachi, I. (2014). Neighborhood social heterogeneity and crime victimization in Japan: moderating effects of social networks. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9(4), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9191-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R. (2016). Introduction: theory and contemporary criminology. In A. R. Piquero (Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 1–17). Surrey: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, M. (2017). Asian values, crime and social change. In J. Liu, M. Travers, & L. Y. C. Chang (Eds.), Comparative criminology in Asia (pp. 33–44). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Staistics Division. (2016). Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions, geographical sub-regions, and selected economic and other groupings. Accessed April 23 2016 http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm#asia.

  • Wilson, D. B. (2009). Missing a critical piece of the pie: simple document search strategies inadequate for systematic reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-009-9085-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama, M. (2013). Development of criminology in Japan from a sociological perspective. In J. Liu, B. Hebenton, & S. Jou (Eds.), Handbook of Asian criminology (pp. 223–230). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2008). Juvenile delinquency and justice in contemporary China: a critical review of the literature over 15 years. Crime, Law and Social Change, 50(3), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9137-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Messner, S. F., & Liu, J. (2008). A critical review of recent literature on crime and criminal justice in China: research findings, challenges, and prospects (introduction). Crime, Law and Social Change, 50(3), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9134-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Messner, S. F., & Lu, J. (2007). Criminological research in contemporary China: Challenges and lessons learned from a large-scale criminal victimization survey. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X06294430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Appendix: Journal Articles Included for the Analysis

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our special thanks are extended to Professor Susanne Karstedt. We would also like to thank Professor Lening Zhang, Professor Kwang-Kuo Hwang, and Navin Kumar for their comments on the early draft of this paper.

Funding

No funding was received to complete this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Suzuki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: Due to an oversight during typesetting, the original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The second author’s name is Chen-Fu Pai, not Cheng-Fu Pai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suzuki, M., Pai, CF. & Islam, M.J. Systematic Quantitative Literature Review on Criminological Theories in Asia. Asian Criminology 13, 129–151 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-017-9262-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-017-9262-9

Keywords

Navigation