Skip to main content

Persia to China: the Silk Road of Restorative Justice I

Abstract

This paper to the 2016 Beijing meeting of the Asian Criminological Society is the first of two lectures on the theme of The Silk Road of Restorative Justice. The second is the annual lecture of the European Forum for Restorative Justice held jointly with the Asia-Pacific Forum for Restorative Justice in Milan (Braithwaite 2017). This first paper opens the idea of restorative justice as a way of thinking that flows back and forth along the Silk Road with a special focus on the development of relational, republican, and feminist thought in ancient and modern China and Persia. Both contemporary China and Iran are left today with quite a universal yet modest national policy of support for restorative justice. Some co-optation of restorative justice by the state and disengagement from it by many key justice professionals are evident in both China and Iran. The second paper argues more normatively for openness to hybridity along the Silk Road. It identifies virtues of being a republican-socialist-capitalist-feminist advocate of restorative justice in light of what we learn along the Silk Road. The unifying message of both papers is that excellence in restorative justice is nurtured by travelling many roads in search of helpful hybrids.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    Reciprocity, mutuality, and harmony were central to Confucian ways of seeing: [Analects XXIII] Tsze-kung asked, saying, ‘Is there one word which may serve as a rule of practice for all one’s life?’ The Master said, ‘is not RECIPROCITY such a word? What you do not want done to yourself, do not do to others.’ (Confucius 1974: 123).

  2. 2.

    In John Braithwaite’s interview (051606) with Grand Ayatollah Musavy Ardabily (who was in recent times head of the Iranian Judiciary), he qualified it by summarizing the detailed and complex rules regulating forgiveness in this way: ‘Yes you also have a right to forgive as a victim but not for all types of crime and not in all circumstances.”’ Yet ‘Forgiveness is the priority above everything…Forgiveness is desired by God. You are closer to God”’s course, to God’s will when you forgive.’ He went on to explain why forgivability for murder was needed in order to maintain peace on earth, but forgiving rape was not possible on earth because of the threat it involves to God’s moral order.

  3. 3.

    In Lorestan Province, for example, with a population of less than one million, there were 270 local mediation councils during our 2016 fieldwork with 1700 trained mediators (meeting 051614 with Lorestan judiciary and mediation leadership).

References

  1. Ahmadi, A. (2016). The rights of victim in the Iranian Code of Criminal Procedure Act 2013. Review of European Studies, 8(3), 279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bakker, F. L. (2013). Comparing the golden rule in Hindu and Christian religious texts. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses, 42(1), 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berchman, R. M. (2008). The golden rule in Greco-Roman religion and philosophy. The golden rule: the ethics of reciprocity in world religions, London: Continuum, 40–54

  4. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Braithwaite, J. (2015a). Gender, class, resilient power: nepal lessons in transformation. RegNet Research Paper, (2015/92)

  6. Braithwaite, J. (2015b). Rethinking criminology through radical diversity in Asian reconciliation. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(3), 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Braithwaite, J. (2017 forthcoming). The Silk Road of restorative justice II. Restorative Justice: An International Journal

  8. Braithwaite, J., & Gohar, A. (2014). Restorative justice, policing and insurgency: learning from Pakistan. Law & Society Review, 48(3), 531–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Briant, P. (2002). From Cyrus to Alexander: a history of the Persian Empire. Eisenbrauns

  10. Chilton, B. (2008). Jesus, the golden rule and its application. The golden rule: the ethics of reciprocity in world religions, London: Continuum, 76–87.

  11. Chongqing Bureau of Statistics.2009–2014 Chongqing Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press

  12. Chongqing People’s Procuratorate. 2009–2014 The annual working report of the municipal procuratorate of Chongqing

  13. Clarke, D. C. (1991). Dispute resolution in China. J. Chinese L., 5, 245.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cloke, K. (1987). Politics and values in mediation: the Chinese experience. Mediation Quarterly, 17, 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Confucius. (1974). The philosophy of Confucius. Trans. James Legge. New York: Crescent Books

  16. Confucius. (2004). Science and spirituality. Trans. Mary Mann. AuthorHouse

  17. Csikszentmihalyi, M. A. (2008). The golden rule in Confucianism. The golden rule: the ethics of reciprocity in world religions, 157

  18. Davis, R. H. (2008). A Hindu golden rule, in context. The golden rule: the ethics of reciprocity in world religions, 146, 161–164.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eisler, R. (1988). The chalice and the blade

  20. Engels, F. (1884). The origin of the family, private property and the state

  21. Farajiha, M & Braithwaite, J. (2017). Forgivability and the deep structure of iranian law. Forthcoming RegNet Working Paper, Australian National University

  22. Fisse, B. (1982). Reconstructing corporate criminal law: deterrence, retribution, fault, and sanctions. S. Cal. L. Rev., 56, 1141.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Glassman, E. J. (1991). Function of medication in China: examining the impact of regulations governing the People’s mediation committees. The. UCLA Pac. Basin LJ, 10, 460.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hallisey, C. (2008). The golden rule in Buddhism [II]. The golden rule: the ethics of reciprocity in world religions. London: Continuum, 129–145

  25. Hertzler, J. O. (1934). On golden rules. International Journal of Ethics, 44(4), 418–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Homerin, T. E. (2008). The golden rule in Islam. In J. Neusner (Ed.), The golden rule in world religions (pp. 99–115). New York: Continuum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hong, D. (2011). Research on the changes of mediation system in contemporary China. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2015). The death penalty: a worldwide perspective. Oxford: OUP Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hu, J., & Zeng, L. (2015). Grand mediation and legitimacy enhancement in contemporary China—the Guang’an model. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(91), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khan, M. Z., & Sharma, K. (1982). Profile of a Nyana panchayat. Delhi: National.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Klostermaier, K. K. (2007). A survey of Hinduism. New York: SuNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Latha, S., & Thilagaraj, R. (2013). Restorative justice in India. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, E. (2015). Towards the lenient justice? A rise of ‘harmonious’ penality in contemporary China. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(4), 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, J. (2016). Asian paradigm theory and access to justice. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(3), 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, J. (2017 forthcoming). The new Asian paradigm: a relational approach. In J. Liu, M. Travers & L. Chang (Eds.), Comparative criminology in Asia. New York: Springer.

  36. Liu, J., & Palermo, G. B. (2009). Restorative justice and Chinese traditional legal culture in the context of contemporary Chinese criminal justice reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Police & Criminal Justice, 7(1), 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, J., Zhao, R., Xiong, H., & Gong, J. (2012). Chinese legal traditions: punitiveness versus mercy. Asia Pacific Journal of Police &Criminal Justice, 9(1), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Llewellyn, J. J., & Philpott, D. (2014). Restorative justice, reconciliation, and peacebuilding. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Lubman, S. (1967). Mao and mediation: politics and dispute resolution in Communist China. California Law Review, 1284–1359.

  40. Mahmoudi, F. (2006). The informal justice system in Iranian law. In H. J. Albrecht & U. Sieber (Eds.), Conflicts and conflict resolution in middle eastern societies: between tradition and modernity (pp. 411–456). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Miller, W. G. (1964). Hosseinabad: a Persian Village. Middle East Journal, 18(4), 483–498.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mo, J. S. (2009). Understanding the role of people’s mediation in the age of globalization. Asia Pac. L. Rev., 17, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Montesquieu, C. D. S. (1977). The spirit of laws: a compendium of the first English edition. In D. W. Carrithers (Ed.) Together with an english translation of an essay on the causes affecting minds and characters. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  44. Nagarajan, H. K., Jha, R., & Pradhan, K. C. (2013). The role of bribes in rural governance: The case of India. Available at SSRN 2246525

  45. National Bureau of Statistics PRC. 1982–2015 China Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press

  46. National People’s Congress (NPC). (2012). Criminal procedure law of the People’s Republic of China (2012)

  47. Olsen, E. J. (2006). Civic republicanism and the properties of democracy: a case study of post-socialist political theory. Lexington Books

  48. Pei, W. (2014). Criminal reconciliation in China: consequentialism in history, legislation, and practice. China-EU Law Journal, 3(3–4), 191–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford: OUP Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Scheible, K. (2008). The formulation and significance of the golden rule in Buddhism. The golden rule: the ethics of reciprocity in world religions, London: Continuum, 116–128

  51. Shankar, S. (2010). Can social audits count?. Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre Working Paper, 9

  52. Singer, M. G. (1963). The golden rule. Philosophy, 38(146), 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Thilagaraj, R. & Liu, J. (Eds.). (2017 forthcoming). Restorative justice in India: traditional practice and contemporary applications. New York: Springer.

  54. Times of India 2013 ‘CAG finds holes in enforcing MNREGA’. The Times of India. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/CAG-finds-holes-in-enforcing-MNREGNarticleshow/21498524.cms

  55. Toussaint, L. L., Owen, A. D., & Cheadle, A. (2012). Forgive to live: forgiveness, health, and longevity. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35(4), 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Weatherford, J. (2011). The secret history of the Mongol queens: how the daughters of Genghis Khan rescued his empire. Broadway Books

  57. Weitekamp, E. G., & Parmentier, S. (2016). Restorative justice as healing justice: looking back to the future of the concept. Restorative Justice: An International Journal, 4, 141–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wu, Y. (2013). People’s mediation in China. The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Criminology, 116

  59. Xenophon. (2002). Translated and annotated by Wayne Ambler. Xenophon: the education of Cyrus. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang, H. (2013). Revisiting people’s mediation in China: practice, performance and challenges. Restorative Justice, 1(2), 244–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhou, Y. (2012). Study report on the development of the people’s mediation system, www.moj.gov.cn/yjs/content/2012-10/18/content_2787430.htm?node=30053

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Braithwaite, J., Zhang, Y. Persia to China: the Silk Road of Restorative Justice I. Asian Criminology 12, 23–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-017-9244-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Restorative justice
  • Silk road
  • Confucius
  • Republican
  • Feminist
  • Forgiveness