Abstract
In criminology, the relationship between risk-taking and delinquency is well established. Although research on the relationship between risk-taking and delinquency is extensive, it is primarily limited to Western contexts. Particularly for Japan, little is known about the relationship between risk-taking and delinquency, as existing empirical studies in English are scarce. The present study examines the relationship between risk-taking and delinquency in the Japanese context. In briefly reviewing the literature on risk-taking in Japan, parenting was an important influence on levels of youths' risk-taking and delinquency. The findings primarily support the mediating role of high risk-taking between parenting and delinquency. Although high risk-taking explained why low maternal attachment and monitoring was related to delinquency, it was unable to explain the relationship completely.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The seriousness scale is rated as follows: homicide, 31.1; sex offenses, 14.3; personal attack, 13.21; aggravated theft, 11.54; personal larceny, 7.1; motor vehicle theft, 6.7; burglary, 6.43; fraud, 6; common theft, 5.07; shoplifting, 2.2; vandalism, 1.8; petty larceny, 1; and public mischief, 0.7
This item was changed from motor theft to bicycle/scooter/motorbike because in Japan, the majority of people do not own cars.
Based on Clogg et al. (1995), this formula is suggested for use in-between-group comparisons of regression coefficients. The equation is believed to be better in detecting actual significance between groups because it does not have a negative biased estimate (i.e., it produces error estimates that are too small which inflate the z-score, encouraging types 1 and 3 errors) of the true standard deviation of the sampling distribution of coefficient differences (Paternoster, Brame, Mazerolle, and Piquero 1998). The suggested formula is Z = (b 1 − b2)/√(SEb 1 2 + SEb 2 2).
For males, low maternal attachment/monitoring to high risk taking = 0.16 and high risk taking to delinquency = 0.24. For females, low maternal attachment/monitoring to high risk taking = 0.24 and high risk taking to delinquency = 0.34.
For males, 0.16*0.24 = 3.8 %; for females, 0.24*0.34 = 8.2 %). These values, however, are more applicable to variables that are normally distributed ratio scales with no error,. but they were included as a gauge of the mediation effect from the study’s measures.
Low maternal attachment/monitoring to delinquency for males = 23 % and for females = 33 %.
Originally, maternal attachment and monitoring were highly correlated (R = .49) but paternal attachment and monitoring was not highly correlated (R = .35), and it was decided to combine these measures and separately analyze maternal and paternal parenting.
References
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Beaver, K. M., Ferguson, C. J., & Lynn-Whaley, J. (2010). The association between parenting and levels of self-control: a genetically informative analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(10), 1045–1065.
Boyer, T. (2006). The development of risk-taking: a multi-perspective review. Developmental Review, 26(3), 291–345.
Burt, C. H., Simons, R. L., & Simons, L. G. (2006). A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: negative evidence for the general theory of crime. Criminology, 44(2), 353–396.
Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Cheng, T. (1995). Reply to Allison: more on comparing regression coefficients. The American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1305–1312.
Deater-Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., et al. (1996). Physical discipline among African American and European American mothers: links to children’s externalizing behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32(6), 1065–1072.
DeVos, G. (1973). Socialization for achievement: essays on the cultural psychology of the Japanese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dussich, J., Friday, P., Okada, T., et al. (2001). Different responses to violence in Japan and America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.
Farrington, D. P. (2005). Childhood origins of antisocial behavior. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 12(3), 177–190.
Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, U.K.: Sage Publications.
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gudykunst, W., & Nishida, T. (1994). Bridging Japanese–North American differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T., Farrington, D., et al. (1998). A review of predictors of youth violence. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 106–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Hay, C. (2001). Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: a test of self-control theory. Criminology, 39(3), 707–736.
Hay, C., Meldrum, R. C., Forrest, W., et al. (2010). Stability and change in risk seeking: investigating the effects of an intervention program. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8(2), 91–106.
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2010). Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(4), 627–660.
Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1993). Group solidarity and social order in Japan. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 5(4), 455–493.
Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Eichelsheim, V. I., et al. (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: a meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(6), 749–775.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Holloway, S. (2010). Women and family in contemporary Japan. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, S., Lynam, D., & Piquero, A. (2011). Substance use, personality, and inhibitors: testing Hirschi’s predictions about the reconceptualization of self-control. Crime & Delinquency. doi:10.1177/0011128711420109.
Karstedt, S. (2001). Comparing cultures, comparing crime: challenges, prospects and problems for a global criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 36(3), 285–308.
Katsuura-Cook, N. (1991). Nihon no kosodate, America no kosodate [child rearing in Japan and in the United States]. Tokyo, Japan: Science-sha.
Kawanishi, Y. (2004). Japanese youth: the other half of the crisis? Asian Affairs, 35, 22–32.
Kazemian, L., Farrington, D., & Le Blanc, M. (2009). Can we make accurate long-term predictions about patterns of de-escalation in offending behaviour? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(3), 384–400.
Keiko, K., & Nagahisa, H. (1998, Unknown). The change in value of children in Japanese mothers. Paper presented at the 15th annual ISSBD meetings, Bern, Switzerland.
Kobayashi, E., Sharp, S., & Grasmick, H. G. (2008). Gender and deviance: a comparison of college students in Japan and the United States. Deviant Behavior, 29(5), 413–439.
Kojima, H. (1986). Child rearing concepts as a belief-value system of the society and the individual. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 39–54). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
Komiya, N. (1999). A cultural study of the low crime rate in Japan. British Journal of Criminology, 39(3), 369–390.
Le Blanc, M., & Fréchette, M. (1989). Male criminal activity from childhood through youth: multilevel and developmental perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Le, T. N., Goebert, D. A., & Wallen, J. (2009). Acculturation factors and substance use among Asian American youth. Journal of Primary Prevention, 30(3–4), 453–473.
Leas, L., & Mellor, D. (2000). Prediction of delinquency: the role of depression, risk-taking, and parental attachment. Behaviour Change, 17(3), 155–166.
Liu, J. (2007). Developing comparative criminology and the case of China: an introduction. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(1), 3–8.
Liu, J. (2009). Asian criminology—challenges, opportunities, and directions. Asian Journal of Criminology, 4(1), 1–9.
Macfarlane, A. (2008). Japan through the looking glass. London, U.K.: Profile Books.
Mathews, G. (2004). Seeking a career, finding a job: how young people enter and resist the Japanese world of work. In G. Mathews & B. White (Eds.), Japan’s changing generations: are young people creating a new society? New York, NY: Routledge.
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2004). Culture and psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/ Thompson Learning.
Miller, A., & Kanazawa, S. (2000). Order by accident: the origins and consequences of conformity in contemporary Japan. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Morselli, C., & Tremblay, P. (2004). Criminal achievement, offender networks and the benefits of low self-control. Criminology, 42(3), 773–804.
Nguyen, N. A. (1992). Working with culture: psychotherapeutic interventions with ethnic minority children and adolescents. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass Publishers.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., et al. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866.
Perrone, D., Sullivan, C. J., Pratt, T. C., et al. (2004). Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquency: a test of a general theory of crime on a nationally representative sample of youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(3), 298–312.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behaviour Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
Reischauer, E. (1988). The Japanese today. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sakaiya, T. (1993). What is Japan? Contradictions and transformations. New York, NY: Kodansha International.
Sasagawa, A. (2004). Centred selves and life choices: changing attitudes of young educated mothers. In G. Mathews & B. White (Eds.), Japan’s changing generations: are young people creating a new society? New York, NY: Routledge.
Schroeder, R. D., Bulanda, R. E., Giordano, P. C., et al. (2011). Parenting and adult criminality: an examination of direct and indirect effect by race. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(1), 64–98.
Shaw, V. N. (2010). Crime and social control in Asia and the Pacific: an examination of larger social institutions and processes. Criminal Justice Studies, 23(4), 303–323.
Thorton, R., & Endo, K. (1992). Preventing crime in America and Japan. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc.
Unnever, J. D., Cullen, F. T., & Agnew, R. (2006). Why is “bad” parenting criminogenic? Implications from rival theories. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(1), 3–33.
White, M. (1994). The material child: coming of age in Japan and America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
White, M. (2002). Perfectly Japanese: making families in an era of upheaval. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Winfree, T., Taylor, T. J., He, N., et al. (2006). Self-control and variability over time: multivariate results using a 5-year, multisite panel of youths. Crime & Delinquency, 52(2), 253–286.
Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., Tracy, P. E., et al. (1985). The national survey of crime severity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129–166.
Yun, I. (2008). Wengu Zhisxin: review the old and know the new. Asia Pacific Journal of Police & Criminal Justice, 6(1), 3–23.
Acknowledgments
The author is very grateful to and appreciative of Mitsuaki Ueda for all his help in the collection of this data. The author would like to also thank David P. Farrington and Daniel J. Marshall for their help and support during this research and also the Research Foundation for Safe Society and the Sasakawa Foundation for their financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bui, L. Examining the Relationship Between Parenting, Risk-Taking, and Delinquency in Japan: Context and Empirical Applicability. Asian Criminology 9, 171–187 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9184-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9184-8