Skip to main content

Engaging the Community to Effectively Plan and Implement Community-Based Mental Health Programs


Community engagement is recognized as an effective means to maximizing public health program impacts despite challenges such as power imbalances that can undermine efforts. The value of engaging communities as equitable partners in the design and delivery of community-based programs has gained increasing traction over the last few decades. Most research in this area has been focused on partnerships between academia and communities, leaving a knowledge gap regarding engagement between community organizations and between community organizations and members. This paper presents a process evaluation that aimed to identify and describe factors found to impact and promote community engagement efforts within a multisite, multiyear, community-based prevention initiative. Findings highlight that strategies such as investing in trust-building efforts, engaging community influencers, and providing meaningful opportunities for community member involvement can help facilitate effective implementation. Recognizing the value and necessity of community engagement in community-based programming is an integral and continuous process.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. O’Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, Oliver S, et al. The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: A meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brunton G, Thomas J, O’Mara-Eves A, et al. Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Principles of Community Engagement. Atlanta, GA: CDC/ATSDR Committee on Community Engagement, 1997. Available online at Accessed on September 20, 2020.

  4. Attree P, French B, Milton B, et al. The experience of community engagement for individuals: A rapid review of evidence. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2011;19(3):250-260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coulter ML, Liller KD, Ejiofor C, et al. Community engagement initiative: Academia partnering with the health department and community agencies for change. Journal of Community Engagement & Higher Education. 2016;8(4):29-38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bonner G, Williams S, Wilkie D, et al. Trust building recruitment strategies for researchers conducting studies in African American (AA) churches: Lessons learned. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care. 2017;34(10):912-917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallerstein N, Oetzel JG, Sanchez-Youngman S, et al. Engage for equity: A long-term study of community-based participatory research and community-engaged research practices and outcomes. Health Education & Behavior. 2020;47(3):380-390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Staley K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE, 2009. Available online at Accessed 20 Sept 2020.

  9. Bodison SC, Sankaré I, Anaya H, et al. Engaging the community in the dissemination, implementation, and improvement of health-related research. Clinical and Translational Science. 2015;8(6):814-819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chau RCM. The Involvement of Chinese Older People in Policy and Practice: Aspirations and Expectations. York: University of Sheffield and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harden A, Sheridan K, McKeown A, et al. Review 5: Evidence Review of Barriers to, and Facilitators of, Community Engagement Approaches and Practice in the UK. London: Institute for Health and Human Development, University of East London, 2015. Available online at Accessed on September 20, 2020.

  12. Pemberton S, Mason J. Co-production and Sure Start Children's Centres: Reflecting upon users', perspectives and implications for service delivery, planning and evaluation. Social Policy and Society. 2009;8(1):13-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Branfield F, Beresford P. Making User Involvement Work: Supporting Service User Networking and Knowledge. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlisle S. Tackling health inequalities and social exclusion through partnership and community engagement? A reality check for policy and practice aspirations from a Social Inclusion Partnership in Scotland. Critical Public Health. 2010;20(1):117-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hickey G, McGilloway S, O'Brien M, et al. Strengthening stakeholder buy-in and engagement for successful exploration and installation: A case study of the development of an area-wide, evidence-based prevention and early intervention strategy. Children and Youth Services Review. 2018;91:185-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Popay J, Attree P, Hornby D, et al. Community Engagement in Initiatives Addressing The Wider Social Determinants of Health: A Rapid Review of Evidence on Impact, Experience and Process. Liverpool and Central Lancashire: Universities of Lancaster, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium (CTSA), Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement. Principles of Community Engagement, Second Edition. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Clinical and Translational Science Awards, 2011.

  18. Atkins MS, Frazier SL, Leathers SJ, et al. Teacher key opinion leaders and mental health consultation in low-income urban schools. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2008;76(5):905-908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. National Implementation Research Network. Competency Drivers. National Implementation Research Network. Available online at Accessed on July 16, 2021.

  20. Active Implementation Research Network. Active Implementation Frameworks. Active Implementation Research Network. Available online at Accessed on July 16, 2021.

  21. National Implementation Research Network. Framework 3: Implementation Drivers. National Implementation Research Network. Available online at Accessed on July 16, 2021.

  22. MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Metzger DS, et al. What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health. American Journal of Public Health. 2001;91(12):1929-1938.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50(1):25-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods Vol 5. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2003.

  25. Eisenhardt KM. Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review. 1989;14(4):532-550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. LeCompte MD, Schensul JJ. Analyzing and Interpreting Ethnographic Data, Vol 5. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jagosh J, Bush PL, Salsberg J, et al. A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tse AM, Palakiko D-M, Daniggelis E, et al. Facilitating community participants' research engagement: Community members' perceptions of community-based research. International Journal of Nursing & Clinical Practices. 2015;2:142.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ahmed SM, Palermo A-GS. Community engagement in research: Frameworks for education and peer review. American Journal of Public Health. 2010;100(8):1380-1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bracic A. For better science: The benefits of community engagement in research. Political Science & Politics. 2018;51(3):550-553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh S, Wassenaar D. Contextualising the role of the gatekeeper in social science research. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law. 2016;9(1):42-46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Minkler M. Ethical challenges for the "outside" researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior. 2004;31(6):684-697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Baiocchi G, Ganuza E. Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered. Politics & Society. 2014;42(1):29-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith LT. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. New York: Zed Books, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Katz KS, El-Mohandes A, Johnson DM, et al. Retention of low income mothers in a parenting intervention study. Journal of Community Health. 2001;26(3):203-218.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors received funding from the Movember Foundation. However, the Movember Foundation was not involved in this study, and the views presented in this paper reflect the perspectives of the authors only.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roxann McNeish PhD, MSW.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest pertaining to this submission to the Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McNeish, R., Albizu-Jacob, A. & Memmoli, C. Engaging the Community to Effectively Plan and Implement Community-Based Mental Health Programs. J Behav Health Serv Res 49, 149–161 (2022).

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: