Skip to main content
Log in

Former Foster System Youth: Perspectives on Transitional Supports and Programs

  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Youth aging out of the foster care system have well-documented challenges when transitioning to adulthood. Multiple transition services provide support in the transition process; however, limited research is available regarding youth’s perceptions of programming. In this pilot study, sixteen youth between ages 18 and 20 participated in semi-structured interviews, support mapping, and resiliency measurements to gather the experiences of the transition from foster care. Comparisons between those who chose initial transition supports and those who did not receive or delayed receiving transition supports were initially explored. Common themes emerged in participants’ needs and perceived resiliency regardless of transition support services. All youth reported relationship, trust, and concern for well-being as highly important characteristics in transition team members. A need for earlier transition programming, decision-making opportunities, and life skills courses were important themes in transition programming needs. Implications for policy, research, and practice are presented based upon findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Administration for Children and Families. Number of children in foster care continues to increase. US Department of Health and Human Services. Available online at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/media/press/2017/number-of-children-in-foster-care-continues-to-increase. Accessed on March 9, 2018.

  2. Russ E, Fryar G. Creating access to opportunities for youth in transition from foster care. American Youth Policy Forum. Available online at http://www.aypf.org/resources/creating-access-to-opportunities-for-youth-in-transition-from-foster-care-2/. Accessed on June 20, 2018.

  3. Courtney ME, Dworksy A, Pollack H. When should the state cease parenting? Evidence from the Midwest Study. Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago. Available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242699379_When_Should_the_State_Cease_Parenting_Evidence_from_the_Midwest_Study. Accessed on June 19, 2018.

  4. Courtney ME, Dworsky A, Ruth G, et al. Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Outcomes at age 19. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Chapin Hall Center, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rashid S. Evaluating a transitional living program for homeless, former foster care youth. Research on Social Work Practice. 2004:240–248

  6. Dworksy A, Dion R. Evaluating housing programs for youth who age out foster care. Housing and Urban Development. Issue Brief. Available online at https://www.huduser.gov/publications/pdf/youth_hsg_issue_brief_v2.pdf.

  7. Gomez RJ, Ryan TN, Norton CL, et al. Perceptions of learned helplessness among emerging adults aging out of foster care. Children and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2015;32:507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Edelstein S, Lowenstein C. Transitioning out of foster care: Employment. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Courtney ME, Dworsky A, Ruth G, et al. Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Outcomes at age 19. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Chapin Hall Center, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Braciszewski JM, Tzilos Wernette GT, Moore RS, et al. Developing a tailored substance use intervention for youth exiting foster care. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2018;77:211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stott T. Transitioning youth: Policies and outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review. 2013;35:218–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Del Quest A, Fullerton A, Geenen S, et al. Voices of youth in foster care and special education regarding their educational experiences and transition to adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review. 2012;34:1604–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rome SH, Raskin M. Transitioning out of foster care: The first 12 months. Youth and Society. 2017:1–19.

  14. Liabo K, McKenna C, Ingold A, et al. Leaving foster or residential care: a participatory study of care leavers’ experiences of health and social care transitions. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2016;43(2):182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lemus D, Farruggia SP, Germo G, et al. The plans, goals, and concerns of pre-emancipated youth in foster care. Children & Youth Services Review. 2017;78:48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kruska BJ, Lindell D, Killion C, et al. “It’s like pay or don’t have it and now I’m doing without”: The voice of transitional uninsured former foster youth. Policy, Politics and Nursing Practice. 2012;13(1):27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Singer ER, Berzin SC, Hokanson K. Voices of former foster youth: Supportive relationships in the transition to adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review. 2013;35:2110–2117.

  18. Rutman D, Hubberstey C. Is there anybody there? Informal supports accesses and doubt by youth from foster care. Children and Youth Services Review. 2016;63:21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Samuels GM, Pryce JM. “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”: Survivalist self-reliance as resilience and risk among young adults aging out of foster care. Children and Youth Services Review. 2008;30:119–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neal D. Academic resilience and caring adults: The experiences of former foster care. Children and Youth Services Review. 2017;79:242–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones L. Measuring resiliency and its predictors in recently discharged foster youth. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2012;29:515–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones L. The first three years after foster care: A longitudinal look at the adaptation of 16 youth to emerging adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review. 2011;33:1919–1929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Strolin-Goltzman J, Woodhouse V, Suter J. A mixed method study on educational well-being and resilience among foster care. Children and Youth Services Review. 2016;70:30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd ed.. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 4th edition. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ungar M. Child and youth resilience measure: Youth version. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Dalhouise University Resilience Research Centre, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Blakeslee JE. Measuring the support networks of transition-age foster youth: Preliminary validation of a social network assessment for research and practice. Children and Youth Services Review. 2015;52:123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2013;13(117):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 5th edition. Sussex, UK: 2018.

  30. Portwood SG, Boyd SA, Nelson EB, et al. A comparison of outcomes for children and youth in foster and residential group care across agencies. Children and Youth Services Review. 2018;85:19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shook JJ, Goodkind S, Herring D. How different are their experiences and outcomes? Comparing aged out and other involved youth. Children and Youth Services Review. 2013;35:11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Font SA. Kinship and nonrelative foster care: The effect of placement type on child well-being. Child Development. 2014;85(5):2074–2090.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Havlicek J. Lives in motion: A review of former foster youth in the context of their experiences in the child welfare system. Children and Youth Services Review. 2011;33:1090–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moore KA. Defining the term “at risk.” Research-to-Results Brief. Washington, DC: Child Trends, 2006.

  35. National Conference of State Legislatures. Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act of 2014. Available online at http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/preventing-sex-trafficking-and-strengthening-families-act-of-2014.aspx#CasePlan. Accessed on May 3, 2019.

  36. Child Welfare Information Gateway. Helping Youth Transition to Adulthood: Guidance for Foster Parents [PDF]. Children’s Bureau. Available online at https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/youth-transition/. Accessed on May 3, 2019.

  37. Child Welfare Information Gateway. Foster Care Statistics 2016. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  38. American Occupational Therapy Association. Transition Resources. Available online at https://www.aota.org/Practice/Children-Youth/Transitions/Resources.aspx. Accessed on December 1, 2018.

  39. American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2014;68(Suppl.1):S1– S48. Available online at https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006. Accessed on May 3, 2019.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Institute for Translational Research Education in Adolescent Drug Abuse; Northern Arizona University, College of Health and Human Services Dean Seed Grant; Paulina Calli; and Tessa Burt and Casey Blaesing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Armstrong-Heimsoth OTD, OTR/L.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Armstrong-Heimsoth, A., Hahn-Floyd, M., Williamson, H.J. et al. Former Foster System Youth: Perspectives on Transitional Supports and Programs. J Behav Health Serv Res 48, 287–305 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-020-09693-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-020-09693-6

Navigation