An Initial Assessment of Leon County Florida’s Pre-Arrest Adult Civil Citation Program

Article

Abstract

Momentum is building behind law enforcement-assisted diversion programs. Some of these programs have been designed specifically for drug-involved offenders, while others focus on adults who have no prior involvement in the criminal justice system. The Leon County Pre-Arrest Diversion program, which has been operating since March 2013, offers first-time arrestees the opportunity to participate in an alternative to arrest-as-usual. Successful completion of the program results in avoidance of a formal criminal arrest record. This paper provides an initial assessment of participants involved in the program during the first 3 years of operation. Results indicate male participants, those who submitted a positive drug test at program initiation, and those who presented significantly greater behavioral health needs were more likely to fail to complete the program and become rearrested. These findings are discussed with regard to practices among pre-arrest diversion programs.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Boruchowitz RC, Brink MN, Dimino M. Minor crimes, massive waste: The terrible toll of America’s broken misdemeanor courts. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Available online at https://www.nacdl.org/reports/misdemeanor. Accessed on October 25, 2017.
  2. 2.
    Hunt D, Rhodes W. Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring Program II in the United States. ICPSR32321-v1. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. Available online at  https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32321.v1. Accessed on October 25, 2017
  3. 3.
    Harris KD. Crime in California. California Department of Justice, California Information Services Division, Bureau of Criminal Information and Analysis, Criminal Justice Statistics Center. Sacramento, CA: Author, 2015.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    LaFountain R, Schauffler R, Strickland S, et al. Examining the work of state courts: An analysis of 2008 state court caseloads. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts, 2010.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blumstein A, Nakamura K. Redemption in the presence of widespread criminal background checks. Criminology. 2009;47(2):327–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uggen C, Vuolo M, Lageson S. The edge of stigma: An experimental audit of the effects of low-level criminal records on employment. Criminology. 2014; 52(4):627–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berson SB. Beyond the sentence-Understanding collateral consequences. NIJ Journal. 2013;272:25–28.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sweeten G. Who will graduate? Disruption of high school education by arrest and court involvement. Justice Quarterly. 2006;23(4):462–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2017.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dennis ML, Chan YF, Funk RR. Development and validation of the GAIN Short Screener (GSS) for internalizing, externalizing, and substance use disorders and crime/violence problems among adolescents and adults. American Journal on Addictions. 2006;15(Supp. 1):80–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dennis ML, Feeney T, Stevens LH, et al. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs-Short Screener (GAIN-SS): Administration and Scoring Manual Version 2.0.3. Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems, 2008.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kopak AM, Cowart JJ, Frost G, et al. The Adult Civil Citation Network: An innovative pre-charge diversion program for misdemeanor offenders. Journal of Community Corrections. 2015;25(1):5–12.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gendreau P, Little T, Goggin C. A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: what works! Criminology. 1996;34(4):575–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cohen TH, Lowenkamp CT, VanBenschoten SW. Does change in risk matter? Examining whether changes in offenders risk characteristics influence recidivism outcomes. Criminology & Public Policy. 2016;15(2):263–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Behavioral Health 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeWestern Carolina UniversityCullowheeUSA

Personalised recommendations