Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Risk Perceptions of E-Smoking Devices: a Cross-Sectional Consumer Survey

  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Abrams DB. Promise and Peril of E-cigarettes: Can Disruptive Technology Make Cigarettes Obsolete? JAMA. 2014;311(2):135–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fagerstrom K, Etter J-F, Unger JB. E-cigarettes: A Disruptive Technology that Revolutionizes our Field? Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2015;17(2):125–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rom O, Pecorelli A, Valacchi G, et al. Are E-cigarettes a Safe and Good Alternative to Cigarette Smoking? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2015;1340:65–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grana RA, Ling PM. “Smoking Revolution”: A Content Analysis of Electronic Cigarette Retail Websites. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2014;46(4):395–403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Palazzolo DL. Electronic Cigarettes and Vaping: A New Challenge in Clinical Medicine and Public Health. Frontiers in Public Health. 2013;1:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bullen C, Howe C, Laugesen M, et al. Electronic Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation: A Randomised Controlled Trial. The Lancet. 2013;382(9905):1629–1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grana RA, Popova L, Ling PM. A Longitudinal Analysis of Electronic Cigarette Use and Smoking Cessation. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2014;174(5):812–813.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilligan A, Compton W. Unravelling Addictions & Brain Reward Systems. SciCom – Making Sense of Science. Available online at http://www.sci-com.eu/main/index.php/events/past-events/72-unravelling-addictions-brain-reward-systems. Accessed on January 4, 2016.

  9. Bunnell RE, Agaku IT, Arrazola RA, et al. Intentions to Smoke Cigarettes among Never-Smoking US Middle and High School Electronic Cigarette Users: National Youth Tobacco Survey, 2011–2013. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2015;17(2):228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. E-cigarette Use Triples among Middle and High School Students in Just One Year. CDC Newsroom Releases. Available online at https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2015/p0416-E-cigarette-use.html. Accessed on January 10, 2016.

  11. Rigotti NA. E-cigarette Use and Subsequent Tobacco Use by Adolescents: New Evidence about a Potential Risk of E-cigarettes. JAMA. 2015;314(7):673–674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wills TA, Sargent JD, Knight R, et al. E-cigarette Use and Willingness to Smoke: A Sample of Adolescent Non-Smokers. Tobacco Control. 2016;25:e52-e59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Travernise S. A Hot Debate Over E-cigarettes as a Path to Tobacco, or From It. New York Times. Available online at https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/health/a-hot-debate-over-e-cigarettes-as-a-path-to-tobacco-or-from-it.html. Accessed on February 23, 2014.

  14. Zhu S-H, Sun JY, Bonnevie E, et al. Four Hundred and Sixty Brands of E-cigarettes and Counting: Implications for Product Regulation. Tobacco Control. 2014;23(suppl 3):iii3-iii9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization. Backgrounder on WHO Report on Regulation of E-cigarettes and Similar Products. Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health. Available online at http://www.who.int/nmh/events/2014/backgrounder-e-cigarettes/en/. Accessed on October 1, 2017.

  16. Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, et al. The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis. 1988;8(2):177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P. The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Pidgeon N, et al. The social amplification of risk framework in brief. In: N Pidgeon, RE Kasperson, P Slovic (Eds). The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 13–46.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Trumbo CW. Examining Psychometrics and Polarization in a Single-Risk Case Study. Risk Analysis. 1996;16(3):429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris JK, Moreland-Russell S, Choucair B, et al. Tweeting For and Against Public Health Policy: Response to the Chicago Department of Public Health’s Electronic Cigarette Twitter Campaign. Journal of Medical Internet Reseach. 2014;16(10):e238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Renn O. Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. In: RE Kasperson, PJM Stallen (Eds). Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, pp. 285–324.

    Google Scholar 

  22. George S, Duran N, Norris K. A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Minority Research Participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health. 2014;104(2):e16-e31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruppel EK. Scanning Health Information Sources: Applying and Extending the Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking. Journal of Health Communication. 2016;21(2):208–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Binder AR, Cacciatore MA, Scheufele DA, et al. The role of news media in the social amplification of risk. In: H Cho, T Reimer, KA McComas (Eds). The Sage Handbook of Risk Communication. California: Sage Publications, 2014, pp. 69–85.

  25. Slovic P. Public Perception of Risk. Journal of Environmental Health. 1997;59(9):22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Survey on Drug Use and Health. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Available online at https://nsduhweb.rti.org/respweb/homepage.cfm. Accessed on October 1, 2017.

  27. Huang J, Kornfield R, Szczypka G, et al. A Cross-Sectional Examination of Marketing of Electronic Cigarettes on Twitter. Tobacco Control. 2014;23(suppl 3):iii26-iii30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kornfield R, Huang J, Vera L, et al. Rapidly Increasing Promotional Expenditures for E-cigarettes. Tobacco Control. 2015;24(2):110–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yulia A. Strekalova PhD, MBA.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strekalova, Y.A., Karimipour, N., James, V. et al. Assessing Risk Perceptions of E-Smoking Devices: a Cross-Sectional Consumer Survey. J Behav Health Serv Res 45, 499–505 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-018-9594-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-018-9594-y

Navigation