Inter-Agency Strategies Used by State Mental Health Agencies to Assist with Federal Behavioral Health Parity Implementation

  • Jonathan Purtle
  • Benjamin Borchers
  • Tim Clement
  • Amanda Mauri
Article

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Health Policy Briefs. Enforcing Mental Health Parity. Health Affairs. Available online at https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20151109.624272/full/. Accessed on April 15, 2017.
  2. 2.
    Barry CL, Huskamp HA, Goldman HH. A Political History of Federal Mental Health and Addiction Insurance Parity. Milbank Quarterly. 2010;88(3):404–433.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barry CL. The Political Evolution of Mental Health Parity. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 2006;14(4):185–194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burns JK. Mental health and Inequity: A Human Rights Approach to Inequality, Discrimination, and Mental Disability. Health and Human Rights. 2013;11(2):19–31.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frank RG. Realizing the Promise of Parity Legislation for Mental Health. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;74(2):117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Consistency of Large Employer and Group Health Plan Benefits with Requirements of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addition Equity Act of 2008. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available online at https://aspe.hhs.gov/report/consistency-large-employer-and-group-health-plan-benefits-requirements-paul-wellstone-and-pete-domenici-mental-health-parity-and-addiction-equity-act-2008. Accessed on April 15, 2017.
  7. 7.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Programs; Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008; The Application of Mental Health Parity Requirements to Coverage Offered by Medicaid Managed Care Organizations, the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and Alternative Benefit Plans. Office of the Federal Register. Available online at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/03/30/2016-06876/medicaid-and-childrens-health-insurance-programs-mental-health-parity-and-addiction-equity-act-of. Accessed on April 15, 2017.
  8. 8.
    Beronio K, Glied S, Frank R. How the Affordable Care Act and Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Greatly Expand Coverage of Behavioral Health Care. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2014;41(4):410–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frank RG, Beronio K, Glied SA. Behavioral Health Parity and the Affordable Care Act. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation. 2014;13(1–2):31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Busch AB, Yoon F, Barry CL, et al. The Effects of Mental Health Parity on Spending and Utilization for Bipolar, Major Depression, and Adjustment Disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 2013;170(2):180–187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grazier KL, Eisenberg D, Jedele JM, et al. Effects of Mental Health Parity on High Utilizers of Services: Pre-Post Evidence from a Large, Self-Insured Employer. Psychiatric Services. 2015;67(4):448–451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stuart EA, McGinty EE, Kalb L, et al. Increased Service Use Among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Associated with Mental Health Parity Law. Health Affairs. 2017;36(2):337–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horgan CM, Hodgkin D, Stewart MT, et al. Health Plans’ Early Response to Federal Parity Legislation for Mental Health and Addiction Services. Psychiatric Services. 2015;67(2):162–168.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thalmayer AG, Friedman SA, Azocar F, et al. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) Evaluation Study: Impact on Quantitative Treatment Limits. Psychiatric Services. 2017;68(5):435–442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dixon K. Implementing Mental Health Parity: The Challenge for Health Plans. Health Affairs. 2009;28(3):663–665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bendat M. In Name Only? Mental Health Parity or Illusory Reform. Psychodynamic Psychiatry. 2014;42(3):353–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Friedman RC. Introduction to the Special Issue on Psychotherapy, the Affordable Care Act, and Mental Health Parity: Obstacles to Implementation. Psychodynamic Psychiatry. 2014;42(3):339–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DeLoss G, Ashpole L, Whelan K. Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Final Rules: Limited Enforcement Options Don’t Overcome Unequal Treatment. Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law. 2014;7(3):73–105.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heller BD. Revolutionizing the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. Seton Hall Law Review. 2017;47(2):569–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Berry KN, Huskamp HA, Goldman HH, et al. Litigation Provides Clues to Ongoing Challenges in Implementing Insurance Parity. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2017;42(6):1065–1098.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    State Insurance Regulation. History, Purpose, and Structure. National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Available online at http://www.naic.org/documents/consumer_state_reg_brief.pdf. Accessed on April 15, 2017.
  22. 22.
    NASMHPD Publications. Too Significant to Fail: The Importance of State Behavioral Health Agencies in the Daily Lives of Americans with Mental Illness, for their Families, and for their Communities. National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors. Available online at https://www.nasmhpd.org/content/too-significant-fail-importance-state-behavioral-health-agencies-daily-lives-americans. Accessed on April 15, 2017.
  23. 23.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Approaches in Implementing the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act: Best Practices from the States. HHS Publication No. SMA 16–4983, Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 2016.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mental Health & Substance Use Disorder Parity Taskforce. Final Report. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available online at https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/advisory-committees/mental-health-parity/task-force/final-report/index.html. Accessed on April 15, 2017.
  25. 25.
    Public Policy Reports. A Long Road Ahead: Achieving True Parity in Mental Health and Substance Use Care. National Alliance on Mental Illness. Available online at https://www.nami.org/About-NAMI/Publications-Reports/Public-Policy-Reports/A-Long-Road-Ahead/2015-ALongRoadAhead.pdf. Accessed on April 15, 2017.
  26. 26.
    Edmond MB, Aletraris L, Roman PM, et al. The United States’ Federal Parity Act and Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: Administrators’ Familiarity and Perceptions of Impact. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2016;34:80–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Psychology Help Center. 2014 Mental Health Parity Survey. American Psychological Association. Available online at https://www.apa.org/helpcenter/parity-survey-2014.pdf. Accessed on April 15, 2017.
  28. 28.
    Harwood JM, Azocar F, Thalmayer A, et al. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Evaluation Study. Medical Care. 2017;55(2):164–172.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McGinty EE, Busch SH, Stuart EA, et al. Federal Parity Law Associated with Increased Probability of Using Out-Of-Network Substance Use Disorder Treatment Services. Health Affairs. 2015;34(8):1331–1339.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ettner SL, Harwood JM, Thalmayer A, et al. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Evaluation Study: Impact on Specialty Behavioral Health Utilization and Expenditures Among “Carve-Out” Enrollees. Journal of Health Economics. 2016;50:131–143.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Friedman SA, Thalmayer AG, Azocar F, et al. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act Evaluation Study: Impact on Mental Health Financial Requirements Among Commercial “Carve-In” Plans. Health Services Research. 2016.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Raghavan R, Bright CL, Shadoin AL. Toward a Policy Ecology of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in Public Mental Health Settings. Implementation Science. 2008;3(1):26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Purtle J, Brownson RC, Proctor EK. Infusing Science into Politics and Policy: The Importance of Legislators as an Audience in Mental Health Policy Dissemination Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2017;44(2):160–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Purtle J, Peters R, Brownson RC. A Review of Policy Dissemination and Implementation Research Funded by the National Institutes of Health, 2007–2014. Implementation Science. 2016;11(1):1.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Purtle J, Dodson E, Brownson R. Policy dissemination research. In: RC Brownson, GA Colditz, EK Proctor (Eds). Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice, Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 443–448.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    State Mental Health Agency Data Search. The State Profile System. NRI, Inc. Available online at http://www.nri-incdata.org/. Accessed on April 15, 2017.
  37. 37.
    Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, et al. A Refined Compilation of Implementation Strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Project. Implementation Science. 2015;10(1):21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Chinman MJ, et al. Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. Implementation Science. 2014;9(1):39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Matthieu MM, et al. Use of Concept Mapping to Characterize Relationships Among Implementation Strategies and Assess their Feasibility and Importance: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Study. Implementation Science. 2015;10(1):109.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation Strategies: Recommendations for Specifying and Reporting. Implementation Science. 2013;8(1):139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Darlington Y, Feeney JA, Rixon K. Interagency Collaboration Between Child Protection and Mental Health Services: Practices, Attitudes and Barriers. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2005;29(10):1085–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Weinberg LA, Zetlin A, Shea NM. Removing Barriers to Educating Children in Foster Care through Interagency Collaboration: A Seven County Multiple-Case Study. Child Welfare. 2009;88(4):77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sloper P. Facilitators and Barriers for Co-ordinated Multi-Agency Services. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2004;30(6):571–580.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cooper M, Evans Y, Pybis J. Interagency Collaboration in Children and Young People’s Mental Health: A Systematic Review of Outcomes, Facilitating Factors and Inhibiting Factors. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2016;42(3):325–342.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM. The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review. 2006;66(s1):44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Behavioral Health 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Purtle
    • 1
  • Benjamin Borchers
    • 1
  • Tim Clement
    • 2
  • Amanda Mauri
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Health Management & PolicyDrexel University Dornsife School of Public HealthPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.The Kennedy ForumIsland HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations