Linking Individuals with Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) in Primary Care to SUD Treatment: the Recovery Management Checkups–Primary Care (RMC-PC) Pilot Study
- 144 Downloads
Linking individuals in primary care settings with substance use disorders (SUDs) to SUD treatment has proven to be challenging, despite the widespread use of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT). This paper reports findings from a pilot study that examined the efficacy of the Recovery Management Checkups intervention adapted for primary care settings (RMC-PC), for assertively linking and engaging patients from Federally Qualified Health Centers into SUD treatment. Findings showed that patients in the RMC-PC (n=92) had significantly higher rates of SUD treatment entry and received more days of SUD treatment compared with those who receive the usual SBIRT referral (n=50). Receipt of RMC-PC had both direct and indirect effects, partially mediated through days of SUD treatment, on reducing days of drug use at 6 months post intake. RMC-PC is a promising intervention to address the need for more assertive methods for linking patients in primary care to SUD treatment.
The authors thank Rod Funk, Brittany Moody, Cheryl Peterson, and Belinda Willis for their assistance preparing the manuscript. The opinions are those of the authors and do not reflect official positions of the government. Comments and questions can be addressed to Dr. Scott.
This paper was supported by grant no. TI023455 from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMHSA)’s Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) to the Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS)’ Division of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse (DASA). Completion of this paper was also supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) grant no. R21 DA045774.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Chestnut Health Systems’ Institutional Review Board.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 8.Scott CK, Dennis ML. Recovery Management Checkups with adult chronic substance users. In J.F. Kelly and W.L. White (eds.), Addiction Recovery Management: Theory, Research and Practice, Current Clinical Psychiatry. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2011 pp. 87–101.Google Scholar
- 13.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (2017). Federally Qualified Health Centers. Available online at https://www.hrsa.gov/opa/eligibility-and-registration/health-centers/fqhc/index.html. Accessed on November 21, 2017.
- 16.Benson DS, Townes PJ, Dobbs D. Quality Management Plan: A practical, patient-centered template. Bethesda, MD: National Association of Community Health Centers; 2011.Google Scholar
- 23.Kim TW, Bernstein J, Cheng DM, et al. Receipt of addiction treatment as a consequence of a brief intervention for drug use in primary care: A randomized trial. Addiction. 2017;112(5):828–827.Google Scholar
- 24.Abraham AJ, Knudsen HK, Rieckmann T, et al. Disparities in access to physicians and medications for the treatment of substance use disorders between publicly and privately funded treatment programs in the United States. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2013;74:258–265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.Scott, CK, Dennis, ML, Recovery Management Check-ups: An Early Re-Intervention Model. Lighthouse Institute; Chicago, IL: 2003. Retrieved on 12/19/16 from http://chestnut.org/Lighthouse-Institute/Bookstore/Product-Details/manuals/recovery-management-check-ups Google Scholar
- 33.Scott CK, Dennis ML, Lurigio AJ. The effects of specialized probation and Recovery Management Check-Ups (RMCs) on treatment participation, substance use, HIV-risk behaviors, and recidivism among female offenders: Main findings of a three-year experiment using subject by intervention interaction analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2017;13(1):53–77.Google Scholar
- 36.Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, et al. AUDIT: The alcohol use disorders identification test guidelines for use in primary care. Second Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2001.Google Scholar
- 38.D’Onofrio G, Pantalon MV, Degutis LC, Larkin GL, O’Connor PG, Fiellin D. BNI Training Manual For Opioid Dependent Patients in the ED. New Haven, CT: Yale University School of Medicine; 2009.Google Scholar
- 39.World Health Organization. Brief Intervention: The ASSIST-linked brief intervention for hazardous and harmful substance use manual for use in primary care; 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press. Available online at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44321/1/9789241599399_eng.pdf. Accessed on December 19. 2016.Google Scholar
- 40.Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Enhancing Motivation for Change in Substance Abuse Treatment. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series, No. 35. Report No.: SMA13–4212. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2013.Google Scholar
- 43.Kadden R, Carbonari J, Litt M, et al. Matching Alcoholism Treatments to Client Heterogeneity: Project MATCH Three-Year Drinking Outcomes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 1998;22(6):1300–1311.Google Scholar
- 45.Rudd RA, Aleshire N, Zibbell JE, et al. Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths — United States, 2000–2014. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2016;64(50):1378–1382. Downloaded from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6450a3.htm CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Tuyet M. State Opioid Crisis Response Advisory Council: Data from the Illinois Department of Public Health. Presentation to the Illinois Opioid Crisis Response Advisory Council on January 21, 2017.Google Scholar
- 47.Kirby D. State Opioid Crisis Response Advisory Council: Data from the Illinois Department of Human Services, Division of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse. Presentation to the Illinois Opioid Crisis Response Advisory Council on January 21, 2017.Google Scholar