Advertisement

Abstinence at Successful Discharge in Publicly Funded Addiction Health Services

  • Jemima A. Frimpong
  • Erick G. Guerrero
  • Yinfei Kong
  • Tina Kim
Article

Abstract

Abstinence at successful discharge in substance use disorder treatment is important to reducing relapse rates and increasing long-term recovery from substance use disorders. However, few studies have examined abstinence as an essential component of successful discharge. This study examined rates and correlates of reported abstinence (nonuse of drugs 30 days prior to successful discharge) among clients attending publicly funded treatment in Los Angeles County, California. Finding show that only 36% of clients who were successfully discharged reported abstinence. Black clients were less likely than non-Hispanic Whites to report abstinence at successful discharge. Clients in methadone treatment programs were less likely than outpatient clients to report abstinence, whereas clients referred to treatment through the legal system (Proposition 36) were more likely to report abstinence compared to self-referred clients. Findings underscore the importance of systematic assessment of abstinence in determining successful discharge and provide a basis for further examination of strategies to improve abstinence and reduce relapse.

Keywords

Heroin Methadone Maintenance Treatment Treatment Completion Treatment Episode Disorder Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support for this research and manuscript preparation was provided by a National Institute of Drug Abuse research grant (R01 DA038608-01:Co-PIs: Erick Guerrero and Bryan Garner). The authors would like to thank Bryan Garner for his help conceptualizing the larger study. We appreciate Dr. Gary Tsai from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Substance Abuse Prevention and Control, for his support accessing administrative data. We also thank the treatment providers for their participation in this study. We also would like to acknowledge Whitney Peters, from the Mailman School of Public Health, and Eric Lindberg, from the School of Social Work at University of Southern California, for proofreading this paper.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. NSDUH Series H-46, DHHS Publication No. SMA 13–4795. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. Addiction Medicine: Closing the Gap between Science and Practice. New York, NY: Columbia University; 2012.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brady TM, Ashley OS, eds. Women in Substance Abuse Treatment: Results from the Alcohol and Drug Services Study (ADSS). Analytic Series A-26, DHHS Publication No. SMA 04–3968. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McKeganey N, Bloor M, Robertson M, et al. Abstinence and drug abuse treatment: results from the Drug Outcome Research in Scotland study. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy. 2006;13(6):537–550.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laudet AB, White WL. Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction, and stress among former poly-substance users. Substance Use & Misuse. 2008;43(1):27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Busch SH, Meara E, Huskamp HA, et al. Characteristics of adults with substance use disorders expected to be eligible for Medicaid under the ACA. Psychiatric Services. 2013;64(6):520–526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guerrero EG, Marsh JC, Khachikian T, et al. Disparities in Latino substance use, service use, and treatment: implications for culturally and evidence-based interventions under health care reform. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2013;133(3):805–813.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Finney JW, Hahn AC, Moos RH. The effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient treatment for alcohol abuse: the need to focus on mediators and moderators of setting effects. Addiction. 1996;91(12):1773–1796.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grella CE, Hser YI, Hsieh SC. Predictors of drug treatment re-entry following relapse to cocaine use in DATOS. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2003;25(3):145–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laudet AB, Stanick V. Predictors of motivation for abstinence at the end of outpatient substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2010;38(4):317–327.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laudet AB, Stanick V, Sands B. What could the program have done differently? a qualitative examination of reasons for leaving outpatient treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2009;37(2):182–190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garnick DW, Lee MT, Horgan CM, et al. Adapting Washington Circle performance measures for public sector substance abuse treatment systems. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2009;36(3):265–277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Evans E, Li L, Hser YI. Client and program factors associated with dropout from court mandated drug treatment. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2009;32(3):204–212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    White WL. Addiction recovery: its definition and conceptual boundaries. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2007;33(3):229–241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sobell MB, Sobell LC, Gavin DR. Portraying alcohol treatment outcomes: different yardsticks of success. Behavior Therapy. 1995;26(4):643–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moore BA, Budney AJ. Relapse in outpatient treatment for marijuana dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2003;25(2):85–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sullivan LE, Moore BA, O’Connor PG, et al. The association between cocaine use and treatment outcomes in patients receiving office-based buprenorphine/Naloxone for the treatment of opioid dependence. American Journal on Addictions. 2010;19(1):53–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maremmani I, Pani PP, Mellini A, et al. Alcohol and cocaine use and abuse among opioid addicts engaged in a methadone maintenance treatment program. Journal of Addictive Diseases. 2007;26(1):61–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sofuoglu M, Gonzalez G, Poling J, et al. Prediction of treatment outcome by baseline urine cocaine results and self-reported cocaine use for cocaine and opioid dependence. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2003;29(4):713–727.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hedden S, Guard M, Arndt S. State of Iowa Outcomes Monitoring System: Year 14 Annual Outcome Evaluation Report. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa: Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse Research and Evaluation; 2012.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ghitza UE, Tai B. Challenges and opportunities for integrating preventive substance-use-care services in primary care through the Affordable Care Act. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 2014;25(1 suppl):36–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Palmer RS, Murphy MK, Piselli A, et al. Substance user treatment dropout from client and clinician perspectives: a pilot study. Substance Use & Misuse. 2009;44(7):1021–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guerrero EG, Marsh JC, Duan L, et al. Disparities in completion of substance abuse treatment between and within racial and ethnic groups. Health Services Research. 2013;48(4):1450–1467.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saloner B, Lê Cook B. Blacks and Hispanics are less likely than Whites to complete addiction treatment, largely due to socioeconomic factors. Health Affairs. 2013;32(1):135–145.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bluthenthal RN, Jacobson JO, Robinson PL. Are racial disparities in alcohol treatment completion associated with racial differences in treatment modality entry? comparison of outpatient treatment and residential treatment in Los Angeles County, 1998 to 2000. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research. 2007;31(11):1920–1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guerrero EG, Campos M, Urada D, et al. Do cultural and linguistic competence matter in Latinos’ completion of mandated substance abuse treatment? Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2012;7:34.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Predictors of Substance Abuse Treatment Completion or Transfer to Further Treatment, by Service Type. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2009.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turan R, Yargic I. The relationship between substance abuse treatment completion, sociodemographics, substance use characteristics, and criminal history. Substance Abuse. 2012;33(2):92–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Woodward AM, Raskin IE, Blacklow B. A profile of the substance abuse treatment industry: organization, costs, and treatment completion. Substance Use & Misuse. 2008;43(5):647–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marsh JC, Shin HC, Cao D. Gender differences in client–provider relationship as active ingredient in substance abuse treatment. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2010;33(2):81–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Melnick G, Wexler HK, Cleland CM. Client consensus on beliefs about abstinence: effects on substance abuse treatment outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2008;93(1–2):30–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Adamson SJ, Sellman JD, Frampton CMA. Patient predictors of alcohol treatment outcome: a systematic review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2009;36(1):75–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moos RH, Moos BS. Treated and untreated alcohol-use disorders: course and predictors of remission and relapse. Evaluation Review. 2007;31(6):564–584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Amato L, Davoli M, Perucci CA, et al. An overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of opiate maintenance therapies: available evidence to inform clinical practice and research. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;28(4):321–329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mattick RP, Breen C, Kimber J, et al. Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003;2:CD002209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mattick RP, Kimber J, Breen C, et al. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;2:CD002207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gowing LR, Farrell M, Bornemann R, et al. Brief report: methadone treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of HIV infection. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006;21(2):193–195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stotts AL, Dodrill CL, Kosten TR. Opioid dependence treatment: options in pharmacotherapy. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2009;10(11):1727–1740.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Guerrero EG. Examination of treatment episodes among women and racial and ethnic minorities in addiction treatment. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions. 2013;13(3):227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wickizer T, Maynard C, Atherly A, et al. Completion rates of clients discharged from drug and alcohol treatment programs in Washington State. American Journal of Public Health. 1994;84(2):215–221.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Coviello DM, Zanis DA, Wesnoski SA, et al. Does mandating offenders to treatment improve completion rates? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2013;44(4):417–425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brown R. Associations with substance abuse treatment completion among drug court participants. Substance Use & Misuse. 2010;45(12):1874–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Evans E, Li L, Urada D, et al. Comparative effectiveness of California’s Proposition 36 and drug court programs before and after propensity score matching. Crime & Delinquency. 2010;60(6):909–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jacobson JO, Robinson P, Bluthenthal RN. A multilevel decomposition approach to estimate the role of program location and neighborhood disadvantage in racial disparities in alcohol treatment completion. Social Science & Medicine. 2007;64(2):462–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jacobson JO, Robinson PL, Bluthenthal RN. Racial disparities in completion rates from publicly funded alcohol treatment: economic resources explain more than demographics and addiction severity. Health Services Research. 2007;42(2):773–794.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Guerrero E, Andrews CM. Cultural competence in outpatient substance abuse treatment: measurement and relationship to wait time and retention. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2011;119(1–2):e13-e22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Marsh JC, Cao D, Shin HC. Closing the need–service gap: gender differences in matching services to client needs in comprehensive substance abuse treatment. Social Work Research. 2009;33(3):183–192.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tonigan JS. Project Match treatment participation and outcome by self-reported ethnicity. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2003;27(8):1340–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhang Z, Friedmann PD, Gerstein DR. Does retention matter? treatment duration and improvement in drug use. Addiction. 2003;98(5):673–684.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Campbell CI, Alexander JA. Culturally competent treatment practices and ancillary service use in outpatient substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2002;22(3):109–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    D’Aunno T. The role of organization and management in substance abuse treatment: review and roadmap. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2006;31(3):221–233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    McCaul ME, Svikis DS, Moore RD. Predictors of outpatient treatment retention: patient versus substance use characteristics. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2011;62(1):9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Perron BE, Bright CL. The influence of legal coercion on dropout from substance abuse treatment: results from a national survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2008;92(1–3):123–131.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stata. Stata 12 User’s Guide. College Station, TX: Stata Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Blakely TA, Woodward AJ. Ecological effects in multi-level studies. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2000;54(5):367–374.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Acevedo A, Garnick DW, Lee MT, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in substance abuse treatment initiation and engagement. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. 2012;11(1):1–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Dobler-Mikola A, Hättenschwiler J, Meili D, et al. Patterns of heroin, cocaine, and alcohol abuse during long-term methadone maintenance treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;29(4):259–265.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jason LA, Davis MI, Ferrari JR. The need for substance abuse after-care: longitudinal analysis of Oxford House. Addictive Behaviors. 2007;32(4):803–818.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Polcin DL, Korcha RA, Bond J, et al. Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2010;38(4):356–365.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hser YI, Evans E, Huang D, et al. Relationship between drug treatment services, retention, and outcomes. Psychiatric Services. 2004;55(7):767–774.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Guerrero EG, Aarons GA, Grella CE, et al. Program capacity to eliminate outcome disparities in addiction health services [published online ahead of print December 2, 2014]. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0617-6
  62. 62.
    Bloom FE. The science of substance abuse, Science. 1997: 278: 15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    O’Brien CP, McLellan AT. Myths about the treatment of addiction, Lancet. 1996: 347: 237–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences. 2008: 363: 3137–3146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Volkow ND, Li TK. Drugs and alcohol: treating and preventing abuse, addiction and their medical consequences. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2005: 108: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O’Brien CP, Kleber HD. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. Journal of The American Medical Association. 2000: 284: 1689–1695.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Grella CE, Stein JA, Weisner C, et al. Predictors of longitudinal substance use and mental health outcomes for patients in two integrated service delivery systems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2010;110(1–2):92–100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    McCarty D, McGuire TG, Harwood HJ, et al. Using state information systems for drug abuse services research. American Behavioral Scientist. 1998;41(8):1090–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Molfenter TD. Addiction treatment centers’ progress in preparing for health care reform. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2014;46(2):158–164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Behavioral Health 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jemima A. Frimpong
    • 1
  • Erick G. Guerrero
    • 2
  • Yinfei Kong
    • 3
  • Tina Kim
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WorkUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Information Systems and Decision Sciences, Mihaylo College of Business and EconomicsCalifornia State University at FullertonFullertonUSA
  4. 4.Los Angeles County Department of Public HealthSubstance Abuse Prevention and ControlAlhambraUSA

Personalised recommendations