Predictors of the Decision to Adopt Motivational Interviewing in Community Health Settings
- 465 Downloads
The purpose of this study is to concurrently examine the impact of individual and organizational characteristics on the decision to adopt the evidence-based practice (EBP) motivational interviewing (MI) among directors and staff (n = 311) in community health organizations (n = 92). Results from hierarchical linear modeling indicated that, at the individual level, attitudes toward EBPs and race each predicted directors’ decisions to adopt, while gender predicted staff’s decisionmaking. At the organizational level, organizational climate was inversely associated with both staff’s and directors’ decisions to adopt MI. Organizational barriers to implementing EBPs and use of reading materials and treatment manuals were related to directors’ decision to adopt. Type of organization and staff attributes were associated with staff’s decision to adopt. These findings underscore the need to tailor dissemination and implementation strategies to address differences between directors and staff in the adoption of EBPs.
KeywordsBehavioral Health Motivational Interview Organizational Climate Comparative Effectiveness Research Adoption Decision
We appreciate the generous support and participation of the community health organization directors and staff who participated in this study and the assistance provided by the National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare and the National Association of Community Health Centers in recruitment, retention, and advice with overall study design. Special thanks to all study staff from MANILA Consulting Group, Inc., McLean, VA. This study was supported by SAMHSA Contract No. HHSS283200700040I/HHSS28342003T
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
This report was prepared under contract by MANILA Consulting Group, Inc., for SAMHSA. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of SAMHSA or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
- 7.Taxman FS, Belenko S. Organizational change — technology transfer processes: A review of the literature. In Implementing evidence-based practices in community corrections and addiction treatment. Springer Series on Evidence-Based Crime Policy 2012;91–128.Google Scholar
- 9.Gallo KP, Barlow DH. Factors involved in clinician adoption and nonadoption of evidence-based interventions in mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2012;19:93–106.Google Scholar
- 11.Williams JR, Dusablon T, Williams WO, et al. Characteristics of community health organizations and decisionmakers considering the adoption of comparative-effectiveness research. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. In review.Google Scholar
- 17.Wang W, Saldana L, Brown CH, et al. Factors that influenced county system leaders to implement an evidence-based program: A baseline survey within a randomized controlled trial. Implementation Science 2010;5(72).Google Scholar
- 21.Panzano PC, Seffrin BA, Chaney-Jones S, et al. The innovation diffusion and adoption research project (IDARP): Moving from the diffusion of research results to promoting the adoption of evidence-based innovations in the Ohio mental health system. New Research in Mental Health 2004;16.Google Scholar
- 23.Gagnon M, Labarthe J, Legare F, et al. Measuring organizational readiness for knowledge translation in chronic care. Implementation Science 2011;6(72):1–10.Google Scholar
- 26.Aarons GA, Horowitz JD, Dlugosz LR, et al. The role of organizational processes in dissemination and implementation research (Chapter 7). In RC Brownson, GA Colditz, & EK. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York: Oxford University Press Inc., 2012.Google Scholar
- 34.Goff V, Pittman P. Making the Business Case for Improving Mental Health Care: How to Maximize Corporate Resources. Washington, DC: Academy Health: National Health Care Purchasing Institute, 2002.Google Scholar
- 35.Williams JR, Tregear SJ, Dusablon T, et al. Increasing adoption of comparative effectiveness research in community behavioral health: Methodology. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. In review.Google Scholar
- 40.Addis ME, Wade WA, Hatgis C. Barriers to dissemination of evidence-based practices: Addressing practitioners; concerns about manual-based psychotherapies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 1999;6:430–441.Google Scholar
- 46.James LR, James LA, Ashe DK. The meaning of organizations: The role of cognition and values. In B Schneider, ed. Organizational Climate and Culture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1990.Google Scholar
- 49.Hemmelgarn AL, Glisson C, James LR. Organizational culture and climate: Implications for services and interventions research. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2006;13:73–89.Google Scholar
- 54.Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research. Survey of Structure and Operations (TCU SSO); 2006. Available at www.ibr.tcu.edu Accessed November 3, 2010.
- 55.Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research. The Organizational Readiness for Change: Treatment Director Version (TCU ORC-D); 2002. Available at: www.ibr.tcu.edu Accessed November 3, 2010.
- 56.Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research. The Organizational Readiness for Change: Treatment Staff Version (TCU ORC-S); 2005. Available at: www.ibr.tcu.edu Accessed November 3, 2010.