Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Case Management and Client Access to Health and Social Services in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A primary goal of case management is to coordinate services across treatment settings and to integrate substance abuse services with other types of services offered in the community, including housing, mental health, medical, and social services. However, case management is a global construct that consists of several key dimensions, which include extent of case management coverage, the degree of management of the referral process, and the location of case management activity (on-site, off-site, or both). This study examines the relationship between specific dimensions of case management and the utilization of health and ancillary social services in outpatient substance abuse treatment. In general, results suggest that more active case management during the referral process and providing case management both on-site and off-site are most consistent with our predictions of greater use of health and ancillary social services by substance abuse clients. However, these effects are specific to general health care and mental health services. Case management appears to have little effect on use of social services or aftercare plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To create the case management referral index, factor analysis was employed, which used a standard threshold value of 1.0 for the eigenvectors. The CM practice index was well captured with a single index, with approximately equal loading of all three referral variables. Using the method of principal factors, the first eigenvalue obtained a value of 1.96, with subsequent factor eigenvalues below 0.2 in absolute value, indicating that a single-factor model captures much of the variance in the three terms.

References

  1. Drake RE, Mercer-McFadden C, Mueser KT, McHugo G, Bond GR. Review of integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment for patients with dual disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1998;24(4):589–608.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Noel PE. The impact of therapeutic case management on participation in adolescent substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse. 2006;32(3):311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Merrill JC. Providing care coordination and treatment services for substance-abusing women in the Work First/New Jersey (TANF) Program. Journal of Health & Social Policy. 2004;18(3):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaluzny AD, Zuckerman HS, Rabiner DJ. Interorganizational factors affecting the delivery of primary care to older Americans. Health Services Research. 1998;33(2 Pt):381–401.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mechanic D. Technologies for the delivery of mental health care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 1996;12(4):673–687.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing Care for Patients with Chronic Illness. Milbank Quarterly. 1996;74(4):511–544.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Principles of Accreditation of Community Mental Health Service Programs. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals; 1979.

  8. Bedell JR, Cohen NL, Sullivan A. Case management: The current best practices and the next generation of innovation. Community Mental Health Journal. 2000;36(2):179–194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Siegal HA. Comprehensive Case Management for Substance Abuse Treatment. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment 1998.

  10. Essock SM, Mueser KT, Drake RE, et al. Comparison of ACT and standard case management for delivering integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders. Psychiatric Service. 2006;57(2):185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedmann PD, D’Aunno TA, Jin L, Alexander JA. Medical and psychosocial services in drug abuse treatment: Do stronger linkages promote client utilization? Health Services Research. 2000;35(2):443–465.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedmann PD, Hendrickson JC, Gerstein DR, Zhang Z. Designated case managers as facilitators of medical and psychosocial service delivery in addiction treatment programs. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2004;31(1):86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McLellan AT, Weinstein RL, Shen Q, Kendig C, Levine M. Improving continuity of care in a public addiction treatment system with clinical case management. American Journal on Addictions. 2005;14(5):426–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McLellan AT, Woody GE, Metzer D, et al (eds). Evaluating the effectiveness of addiction treatment: Reasonable expectations, appropriate comparisons. Treating drug abusers effectively. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 1997.

  15. Bachrach L. Continuity of care for chronic mental patients: a conceptual analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1981;33(3):189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mueser KT, Bond GR, Drake RE, Resnick SG. Models of community care for severe mental illness: a review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1998;34(1):37–74.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shwartz M, Baker G, Mulvey K, Plough A. Improving publicly funded substance abuse treatment: the value of case management. American Journal of Public Health. 1997;87(10):1659–1664.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Robles RR, Reyes JC, Colon HM, et al. Effects of combined counseling and case management to reduce HIV risk behaviors among Hispanic drug injectors in Puerto Rico: a randomized controlled study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2004;27(2):145–152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pescosolido BA, Wright E, Sullivan WP. Communities of care: A theoretical perspective on case management models. In: Albrecht GL, ed. Mental Health in Advances in Medical Sociology: Case and Care Management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1995:37–79.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Anthony WA, Psychiatric rehabilitation: key issues and future policy. Health Affairs. 1992;Fall:164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holloway F, Oliver N, Collins E, Carson J. Case management: a critical review of the outcome literature. European Psychiatry. 1995;10:113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shwartz M, Stone DA, Camp J, Mulvey KP, Kane M, Plough A. The value of case management in the publicly funded substance abuse treatment system. The perspective of program directors, case managers and clients. Care Management Journals. 2000;2(3):139–147.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chamberlain R, Rapp CA. A decade of case management: a methodological review of outcome research. Community Mental Health Journal. 1991;27(3):171–188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Egger GM, Zimmer JG, Hall WJ, Friedman B. Case management: a randomized controlled study comparing a neighborhood team and a centralized individual model. Health Services Research. 1991;26(4):471–507.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Graham K, Birchmore-Timney C. The problem of replicability in program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1989;12:179–187.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gensichen J, Beyer M, Muth C, et al. Case management to improve major depression in primary health care: A systematic review .see comment. Psychological Medicine. 2006;36(1):7–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Scott JE, Dixon LB. Assertive community treatment and case management for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1995;21(4):657–668.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Solomon P. The efficacy of case management services for severely mentally disabled clients. Community Mental Health Journal. 1992;29(3):163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Saleh SS, Vaughn T, Hall J, et al. The effect of case management in substance abuse on health services use. Care Management Journals. 2003;4(2):82–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Marshall M, Gray A, Lockwood A, Green R. Case management for those with severe mental disorders. In: Cochrane Collaboration, ed. Cochrane Library. Oxford: Update Software; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ziguras SJ, Stuart GW. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mental health case management over 20 years. Psychiatric Services. 2000;51(11):1410–1421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gorey KM, Leslie DR, Morris T, et al. Effectiveness of case management with severely and persistently mentally ill people. Community Mental Health Journal. 1998;34(3):241–250.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lamb GS. Case Management. Annual Review of Nursing Research. 1995;13:117–136.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun AP. Program factors related to women’s substance abuse treatment retention and other outcomes: a review and critique. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2006;30(1):1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bachrach L. Continuity of care in approaches to case management for long-term mentally ill patients. Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 1993;44(50):465–468.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bigelow D, Young DJ. Effectiveness of a case management program. Community Mental Health Journal. 1991;27(2):115–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Corrigan P, Kayton-Weinberg D. Aggressive and problem-focused models of case management for the severely mentally ill. Community Mental Health Journal. 1993;29(5):449–458.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Quinlivan R, Hough R, Crowell A, Beach C, Hofstetter R, Kenworthy K. Service utilization and costs of care for severely mentally ill clients in an intensive case management program. Psychiatric Services. 1995;46(4):365–371.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McLellan AT, Arndt I, Metzger O, et al. The effects of psychosocial services in substance abuse treatment. JAMA. 1993;269:1953–1959.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Heeringa SG. Outpatient drug abuse treatment studies: Technical documentation. Ann Arbor, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 1996.

  41. D’Aunno T, Vaughn TE. An organizational analysis of service patterns in outpatient drug abuse treatment units. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1995;16:27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Friedmann PD, Alexander JA, D’Aunno TA. Organizational correlates of access to primary care and mental health services in drug abuse treatment units. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;16:71–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Seale JP, Muramto ML. Substance abuse among minority populations. Substance Abuse. 1993;20:167–180.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Alemi F, Stephens RC, Llorens S, et al. A review of factors affecting treatment outcomes: Expected treatment outcome scale. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1995;21(4):483–509.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ornstein P, Cherapon JA. Demographic variables as predictors of alcoholism treatment outcome. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1985;46(5):425–432.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. McLellan AT, Alterman AI, Metzger DS, et al. Similarity of outcome predictors across opiate, cocaine, and alcohol treatments: role of treatment services. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1994;62(6):1141–1158.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Joe GW, Simpson DD, Sells SB. Treatment process and relapse to opiod use during methadone maintenance. American Journal of Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1992;19:124–130.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Simpson DD. Effectiveness of drug-treatment: a review of research from field settings. In: Egertson JA, Fox DM, Leshner AI, eds. Treating Drug Abusers Effectively. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.; 1997:41–74.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Winship C, Mare RD. Models for sample selection bias. Annual Review of Sociology. 1992;18:327–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Breen R. Regression models: Censored, sample selected or truncated data. (Quantitative applications in the social sciences). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Batten HL, Horgan CH, Prottas JM, Simon LJ, Larson MJ, Elliot EA. Drug services research survey. Phase I final report: non-correctional facilities. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Institute for Health Policy; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by grants 5R01-DA03272, 5R01-DA087231, and 5R01-DA003272-20 from The National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Alexander PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexander, J.A., Pollack, H., Nahra, T. et al. Case Management and Client Access to Health and Social Services in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment. J Behav Health Serv Res 34, 221–236 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-007-9072-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-007-9072-4

Keywords

Navigation