Abrahamson, D., Andrade, A., Bakker, A., Nathan, M. J., Walkington, C., Lindgren, R., … Lindwall, O. (2018). Moving forward: In search of synergy across diverse views on the role of physical movement in design for STEM education. Proceedings of international conference of the learning sciences, 2, 1243–1250.
Abrahamson, D., & Lindgren, R. (2014). Embodiment and embodied design. In In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.022.
Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611446.
Anthony, L., Stofer, K. A., Luc, A., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2016). Gestures by children and adults on touch tables and touch walls in a public science center. Proceedings of the Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930682.
Anthony, L., Yang, J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2012). A paradigm for handwriting-based intelligent tutors. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(11), 866–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.04.003.
Baccaglini-Frank, A., & Maracci, M. (2015). Multi-touch technology and preschoolers’ development of number sense. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 1, 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-015-0002-4.
Becvar, L. A., Hollan, J., & Hutchins, E. (2005). Hands as molecules: Representational gestures used for developing theory in a scientific laboratory. Semiotica, 2005(156), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.89.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Cheek, K. A. (2010). Commentary: A summary and analysis of twenty-seven years of geoscience conceptions research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(3), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3544294.
Danish, J. A., Enyedy, N., Saleh, A., & Humburg, M. (2020). Learning in embodied activity framework: A sociocultural framework for embodied cognition. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15, 49–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09317-3.
Dasu, K., Ma, K.-L., Ma, J., & Frazier, J. (2019). Sea of Genes: Combining Animation and Narrative Strategies to Visualize Metagenomic Data for Museums. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01071
Davidsen, J., & Ryberg, T. (2017). “This is the size of one meter”: Children’s bodily-material collaboration. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.22318/cscl2015.150.
Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.08.003.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 3–19). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_1.
Dubé, A. K., & McEwen, R. N. (2015). Do gestures matter? The implications of using touchscreen devices in mathematics instruction. Learning and Instruction, 40, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.002.
Epps, J., Oviatt, S., & Chen, F. (2004). Integration of speech and gesture inputs during multimodal interaction. Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
Fleck, R., Rogers, Y., Yuill, N., Marshall, P., Carr, A., Rick, J., & Bonnett, V. (2009). Actions speak loudly with words: Unpacking collaboration around the table. Proceedings of the Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/1731903.1731939.
Geller, T. (2006). Interactive tabletop exhibits in museums and galleries. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 26(5), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2006.111.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Action’s influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 664–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388764.
Goldinger, S. D., Papesh, M. H., Barnhart, A. S., Hansen, W. A., & Hout, M. C. (2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(4), 959–978. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0860-1.
Goldman, K. H., & Gonzalez, J. (2014). Open exhibits multitouch table use findings. Ideum Open Exhibits Papers. Retrieved from http://openexhibits.org/exhibit-design/multitouch-table-research-findings/8801/
Goldman, K. H., Kessler, C., & Danter, E. (2010). Science On a Sphere: Cross-site Summative Evaluation. In Institute for Learning Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.oesd.noaa.gov/network/SOS_evals/SOS_Final_Summative_Report.pdf
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X.
Greenberg, S., Carpendale, S., Marquardt, N., & Buxton, B. (2011). Sketching user experiences: The workbook. Elsevier.
Gutwill, J. P., & Allen, S. (2010). Facilitating family group inquiry at science museum exhibits. Science Education, 94(4), 710–742. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20387.
Hoadley, C. P. (2002). Creating context: Design-based research in creating and understanding CSCL. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, 453–462. https://doi.org/10.3115/1658616.1658679.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new Foundation for human-computer interaction research. Proceedings of Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI’00), 7(2), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487.
Horn, M., Leong, Z. A., Block, F., Diamond, J., Evans, E. M., Phillips, B., & Shen, C. (2012). Of BATs and APEs: An Interactive Tabletop Game for Natural History Museums. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2059–2068. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208355.
Hornecker, E. (2005). A design theme for tangible interaction: Embodied facilitation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.5555/1242029.1242031.
Hornecker, E. (2008). “I Don’t understand it either, but it is cool” - visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum. IEEE Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/TABLETOP.2008.4660193.
Hullman, J., Adar, E., & Shah, P. (2011). Benefitting InfoVis with visual difficulties. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2213–2222. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.175.
Kharrufa, A. S., & Olivier, P. (2010). Exploring the requirements of tabletop interfaces for education. International Journal of Learning Technology, 5(1), 42–62.
Kim, K. T., & Elmqvist, N. (2012). Embodied lenses for collaborative visual queries on tabletop displays. Information Visualization, 11(4), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871612441874.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., Zambrano, R., & J. (2018). From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y.
Kirsh, D. (2013). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(1), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2442106.2442109, 1, 30.
Kiverstein, J. D., & Rietveld, E. (2018). Reconceiving representation-hungry cognition: An ecological-enactive proposal. Adaptive Behavior, 26(4), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712318772778.
Köpsel, A., & Bubalo, N. (2015). Benefiting from legacy Bias. Interactions, 22(5), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/2803169.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lin, M., Preston, A., Kharrufa, A., & Kong, Z. (2016). Making L2 learners’ reasoning skills visible: The potential of computer supported collaborative learning environments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.004.
Lobben, A., & Lawrence, M. (2015). Synthesized model of geospatial thinking. The Professional Geographer, 67(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.935155.
Ma, J. (2008). Visitors’ Interpretations of Images of the Nanoscale. In Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network. Retrieved from www.nisenet.org/sites/default/catalog/eval/uploads/2009/04/1353/visitor_interpretations.pdf.
Ma, J., Liao, I., Ma, K. L., & Frazier, J. (2012). Living liquid: Design and evaluation of an exploratory visualization tool for museum visitors. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2799–2808. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.244.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind : What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.
Morris, M. R., Huang, A., Paepcke, A., & Winograd, T. (2006). Cooperative gestures: Multi-user gestural interactions for co-located groupware. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1201–1210. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124952.
Oviatt, S. (1997). Multimodal interactive maps: Designing for human performance. Human-Computer Interaction, 12(1–2), 93–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.1997.9667241.
Piper, A. M., Friedman, W., & Hollan, J. D. (2012). Setting the stage for embodied activity: Scientific discussion around a multi-touch tabletop display. International Journal of Learning Technology, 7(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2012.046866.
Piper, A. M., & Hollan, J. D. (2009). Tabletop displays for small group study: Affordances of paper and digital materials. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1227–1236. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518885.
Price, S., Falcão, T. P., Sheridan, J. G., & Roussos, G. (2009). The effect of representation location on interaction in a tangible learning environment. Proceedings of the Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/1517664.1517689.
Rick, J., Marshall, P., & Yuill, N. (2011). Beyond one-size-fits-all: How interactive tabletops support collaborative learning. Proceedings of the Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/1999030.1999043.
Rogers, Y., & Muller, H. (2006). A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and reflection in play. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 64(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.05.004.
Rust, K., Malu, M., Anthony, L., & Findlater, L. (2014). Understanding child-defined gestures and Children’s mental models for touchscreen tabletop interaction. Proceedings of the Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610452.
Schuman, C., Stofer, K. A., Anthony, L., Neff, H., Chang, P., Soni, N., et al. (2020). Ocean data visualization on a Touchtable demonstrates group content learning, science practices use, and potential embodied cognition. Research in Science Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09951-9.
Segal, A. (2011). Do gestural interfaces promote thinking? Embodied Interaction: Congruent Gestures and Direct Touch Promote Performance in Math. Columbia University.
Sinclair, N., & Pimm, D. (2015). Mathematics using multiple senses: Developing finger gnosis with three- and four-year-olds in an era of multi-touch technologies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education, 9, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.17206/apjrece.2015.9.3.99.
Soni, N., & Anthony, L. (2019). HCI methodologies for designing natural user interactions that do not interfere with learning. Paper for the “making the learning sciences count: Impacting Association for Computing Machinery Communities in human-computer interaction” workshop, International Conference of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5 pages.
Soni, N., Darrow, A., Luc, A., Gleaves, S., Schuman, C., Neff, H., … Anthony, L. (2019b). Analysis of touchscreen interactive gestures during embodied cognition in collaborative tabletop science learning experiences. Proceedings of the Conference of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 9–16.
Soni, N., Gleaves, S., Neff, H., Morrison-Smith, S., Esmaeili, S., Mayne, I., et al. (2019c). Do user-defined gestures for Flatscreens generalize to interactive spherical displays for adults and children? Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3321335.3324941.
Soni, N., Gleaves, S., Neff, H., Morrison-Smith, S., Esmaeili, S., Mayne, I., et al. (2020). Adults’ and Children’s mental models for gestural interactions with interactive spherical displays. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376468.
Stahl, G. (2018). A Theory of Group Cognition in CSCL. Retrieved from http://gerrystahl.net/pub/theory.pdf
Steier, R., Kersting, M., & Silseth, K. (2019). Imagining with improvised representations in CSCL environments. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 109–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09295-1.
Stofer, K. A. (2016). When a picture Isn’t worth 1000 words: Learners struggle to find meaning in data visualizations. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(3), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.5408/14-053.1.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Tang, J. C. (1991). Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(91)90039-A.
Tse, E., Shen, C., Greenberg, S., & Forlines, C. (2006). Enabling interaction with single user applications through speech and gestures on a multi-user tabletop. Proceedings of the Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133336.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wee, L. (2005). Class-inclusion and correspondence models as discourse types: A framework for approaching metaphorical discourse. Language in Society, 34(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050098.
Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied Cognition is Not What You Think It Is. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 58 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322.
Xambó, A., Jewitt, C., & Price, S. (2014). Towards an integrated methodological framework for understanding embodiment in HCI. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1411–1416. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2581276.
Zheng, L., Cui, P., & Zhang, X. (2020). Does collaborative learning design align with enactment? An innovative method of evaluating the alignment in the CSCL context. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15, 193–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09320-8.