This research investigates a design and development approach to improving science teachers’ access to effective professional development (PD) in a fully online, asynchronous environment. Working with a small number of teachers, this study explores how a design combining social capital mechanisms with essential teacher learning and PD characteristics supported teachers’ abilities to participate in the online course and collaboratively build knowledge. Teachers’ perceptions of their experiences both in surveys and interviews demonstrated high satisfaction with the quality and usability of the PD, including positive beliefs related to the social capital elements of tie quality, depth of interaction, and access to expertise. Further transactivity analyses of their interactions in course discussions showed higher levels of collaborative discourse resulting from prompts that specifically targeted the exchange of information over those that asked teachers to reflect about their content understanding or their classroom practice. Implications for this design for asynchronous online PD approaches to reach more teachers are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
Alterman, R., & Harsch, K. (2017). A more reflective form of joint problem solving. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(1), 9–33.
An, Y. (2018). The effects of an online professional development course on teachers’ perceptions, attitudes, self-efficacy, and behavioral intentions regarding digital game-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 1505–1527.
Booth, S. E. (2012). Cultivating knowledge sharing and trust in online communities for educators. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(1), 1–31.
Chen, B., & Huang, T. (2019). It is about timing: Network prestige in asynchronous online discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35, 503–515.
Chi, M., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Sociology and economic approaches to the analysis of social structure. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
European Commission. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship. European Union: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Science with and for Society.
Farley-Ripple, E. N., & Buttram, J. L. (2018). Structuring for success: Building instructional capacity through social capital at Allegheny elementary. In S. Yoon & K. Baker-Doyle (Eds.), Networked by design: Interventions for teachers to develop social capital. Routledge.
Fishman, B., Konstantopoulos, S., Kubitskey, B. W., Vath, R., Park, G., Johnson, H., & Edelson, D. (2013). Comparing the impact of online and face-to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 426–438.
Gerard, L., Varma, K., Corliss, B., & Linn, M. (2011). Professional development for technology-enhanced inquiry science. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 408–448.
Gweon, G., Jain, M., Mcdonough, J., Raj, B., & Rosé, C. P. (2013). Measuring prevalence of other-oriented transactive contributions using an automated measure of speech style accommodation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9172-5.
Hatch, T., White, M. E., Raley, J., Austin, K., Capitelli, S., & Faigenbaum, D. (2006). Into the classroom: Developing the scholarship of teaching and learning. Jossey-Bass.
Hew, F., & Cheung, W. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58.
Hill, H. C. (2009). Fixing teacher professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 470–476.
Hill, H. (2015). Review of the mirage: Confronting the hard truth about our quest for teacher development. National Education Policy Center. http://nepc.colorado.edu/thinktank/review-tntp-mirage
Hodkinson, H., & Hodkinson, P. (2005). Improving schoolteachers’ workplace learning. Research Papers in Education, 303(2), 109–131.
IES & NSF. (2013). Common guidelines for education research and development. Washington, DC: Authors.
Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 19–38.
Leana, C. (2011). The missing link in school reform. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 30–35.
Lieberman, A., & Mace, D. P. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 77–88.
Merritt, E. G. (2016). Time for teacher learning, planning critical for school reform: Students aren’t the only ones who need more time to learn; teachers also need more and better time for learning and for planning. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(4), 31–36.
Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Cornelissen, F., Liou, Y.-H., Callier, S., Riordan, R., Wilson, K., & Cohen, N. A. (2014). Linked to innovation: Shaping an innovative climate through network intentionality and educators’ social network position. Journal of Educational Change, 15(2), 99–123.
Moon, J., Passmore, C., Reiser, B., & Michaels, S. (2014). Beyond comparisons of online versus face-to-face PD. Commentary in response to Fishman et al., Comparing the impact of online and face- to-face professional development in the context of curriculum implementation. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(2), 172–176.
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press.
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers & Education, 61, 59–76.
Parsons, S. A., Hutchison, A. C., Hall, L. A., Parsons, A. W., Ives, S. T., & Leggett, A. B. (2019). U.S. teachers’ perceptions of online professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 33–42.
Peltola, P., Haynes, E., Clymer, L., McMillan, A., & Williams, H. (2017). Opportunities for teacher professional development in Oklahoma rural and nonrural schools (REL 2017–273). Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for education evaluation and regional assistance, regional educational Laboratory southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
Penuel, W. R., de los Santos, E., Lin, Q., Marshall, S., Anderson, C. W., Frank, K. (2018). Building networks to support effective use of science curriculum materials in the Carbon Time project. In S. Yoon & K. Baker-Doyle (Eds.), Networked by design: Interventions for teachers to develop social capital. Routledge.
Peterson, A. T., Beymer, P. N., & Putnam, R. T. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous discussions: Effects on cooperation, belonging, and affect. Online Learning, 22(4), 7–25.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2nd ed. (pp. 397–417). Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, M. M. (2009). Instructional-design theory to guide the creation of online learning communities for adults. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 53, 48–56.
Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361–384). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
TNTP. (2015). The mirage: Confronting the hard truth about our quest for teacher development. https://tntp.org/assets/documents/TNTP-Mirage_2015.pdf
Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2014). The role of content support and transactivity for effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts on domain-specific learning: A meta-analysis. In 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (pp. 677–682). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2014.82.
Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Reiss, K., & Fischer, F. (2016). Developing argumentation skills in mathematics through computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of transactivity. Instructional Science, 44(5), 477–500.
Webb, D. C., Nickerson, H., & Bush, J. B. (2017). A comparative analysis of online and face-to-face professional development models for CS education. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 621–626).
Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 46(1), 71–95.
Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340, 310–313.
Yoon, S. (2018). Mechanisms that couple intentional network rewiring and teacher learning to develop teachers’ social capital for implementing computer-supported complex systems curricula. In S. Yoon and K. Baker-Doyle. Networked by design: Interventions for teachers to develop social capital. Routledge press.
Yoon, S. A., & Baker-Doyle, K. (Eds.). (2018). Networked by design: Interventions for teachers to develop social capital. New York: Routledge Press.
Yoon, S., Klopfer, E., Anderson, E., Koehler-Yom, J., Sheldon, J., Schoenfeld, I., Wendel, D., Scheintaub, H., Oztok, M., Evans, C., & Goh, S. (2016). Designing computer-supported complex systems curricula for the next generation science standards in high school science classrooms. Systems, 4(38), 1–18 http://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/4/4/38/html.
Yoon, S., Anderson, E., Koehler-Yom, Evans, C., Park, M., J., Sheldon, J., Schoenfeld, I., Wendel, D., Scheintaub, H., & Klopfer, E. (2017a). Teaching about complex systems is no simple matter: Building effective professional development for computer-supported complex systems instruction. Instructional Science, 45(1), 99–121.
Yoon, S., Koehler-Yom, J., & Yang, Z. (2017b). The effects of teachers’ social and human capital on urban science reform initiatives: Considerations for professional development. Teachers College Record, 119(4), 1–32.
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2014). Guidelines for facilitating the development of learning communities in online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 220–232.
Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (2014). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Routledge.
This research was funded by a Discovery Research K-12 National Science Foundation Grant– #1721003.
This research was funded by two U.S. National Science Foundation Discovery Research K-12 grants (DRL #1721003 and DRL #1019228).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no known conflicts of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Yoon, S.A., Miller, K., Richman, T. et al. Encouraging collaboration and building Community in Online Asynchronous Professional Development: designing for social capital. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 15, 351–371 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09326-2
- Social Capital
- Online Asynchronous Learning
- Teacher Professional Development