Learners’ agency and CSCL technologies: towards an emancipatory perspective
This squib continues the ongoing conversation about the direction and future of CSCL, initiated by Wise and Schwarz (International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12, 423–467, 2017) and the ijCSCL editors. It argues that CSCL should take an emancipatory perspective to learners’ agency and its technological substratum. The implication is that learners should be empowered to select, change, inter-operate and/or adapt not only the software applications they use, but more generally, the support they obtain from these technologies. This raises many exciting questions and challenges for CSCL in terms of educational, social, design and technical considerations.
KeywordsLearners’ agency Emancipation Adaptability Design of computational artifacts
- Betbeder, M.-L., & Tchounikine, P. (2003). Symba: A framework to support collective activities in an educational context. In International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2003), Hong-Kong (China) (pp. 188–196).Google Scholar
- Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (Vol. 6). Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
- Jermann, P., Soller, A., & Muehlenbrock, M. (2001). From mirroring to guiding: A review of the state of art technology for supporting collaborative learning. In European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning EuroCSCL-2001 (pp. 324–331).Google Scholar
- Mørch, A. I. (1997). Three levels of end-user tailoring: Customization, integration, and extension. In M. Kyng & L. Mathiassen (Eds.), Computers and design in context (pp. 51–76). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., Järvelä, S., et al. (2017). Facilitating socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring in collaborative learning with a regulation macro script – an exploratory study. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 251–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soller, A., Martínez, A., Jermann, P., & Muehlenbrock, M. (2005). From mirroring to guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(4), 261–290.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G. (2016). The group as paradigmatic unit of analysis: The contested relationship of CSCL to the learning sciences. In M. A. Evans, M. J. Packer, & R. K. Sawyer (Eds.), Reflections on the learning sciences (ch. 5). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Tchounikine, P. (2011). Computer science and educational software design – A resource for multidisciplinary work in technology enhanced learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20003-8_6.
- Tchounikine, P., Rummel, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Computer supported collaborative learning and intelligent tutoring systems. In R. Nkambou, J. Bourdeau, & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.), Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. Studies in computational intelligence (Vol. 308). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Wecker, C., Stegmann, K., Bernstein, F., Huber, M. J., Kalus, G., Rathmeyer, S., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). S-COL: A Copernican turn for the development of flexibly reusable collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wild, F., Kalz, M. & Palmér, M. (2008). Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments. Proceedings of 1st Workshop MUPPLE’08, Maastricht, The Netherlands, September 17, 2008, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, ISSN 1613-0073, online CEUR-WS.org/Vol-388/.
- Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. London: Verso.Google Scholar