A more reflective form of joint problem solving

Article

Abstract

This paper explores the emergence of joint problem solving in online environments where the participants work together but at different times and from different places. Collaborations of this sort have been referred to as loosely coupled collaborations. The focus is on venue which is the virtual substitute for physical copresence under these conditions. Venue is fundamentally a social construct. It functions to “localize” participation dynamics, communication and register, the creation and sharing of domain objects, and situation-dependent knowledge. Within venue, the reflective parts of joint problem solving become more prominent. Within venue, small teams of students align their views, coordinate their efforts, share their understanding and work, and jointly problem solve.

Keywords

Different time and place collaboration Joint problem solving Loosely coupled collaboration Venue 

References

  1. Alterman, R., & Gunnarsson, B. (2013). The blogosphere as representational space, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  2. Alterman, R., & Larusson, J. (2010). Aggregation in the blogosphere, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences on ZZZ-Volume 2 (pp. 294–295). International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  3. Alterman, R., & Larusson, J.A. (2013). Participation and common knowledge in a case study of student blogging. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 149–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, R.G., & Wright, H.F. (1954). Midwest and its children: The psychological ecology of an American town. Row, Peterson and Company.Google Scholar
  5. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, A.L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J.C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 188–228.Google Scholar
  7. Cameron, D., & Anderson, T. (2006). Comparing weblogs to threaded discussion tools in online educational contexts. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(11), 3–15.Google Scholar
  8. Cesareni, D., Cacciamani, S., & Fujita, N. (2016). Role taking and knowledge building in a blended university course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, H., & Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 127–149.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, H., & Marshall, C. (2002). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Josh, A., Webber, B., & Sag, I. (Eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cress, U. (2013). Mass collaboration and learning. Handbook of design in educational technology, 416–424.Google Scholar
  12. Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deng, L., & Yuen, A.H. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56(2), 441–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning?. In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series (pp. 1–19). Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  15. Dillenbourg, P., Lemaignan, S., Sangin, M., Nova, N., & Molinari, G. (2016). The symmetry of partner modelling. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and a samples of questions that were considered follow in multimodal collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dillenbourg, P., Traum, D., & Schneider, D. (1996). Grounding in multi-modal task-oriented collaboration, Proceedings of the European Conference on AI in Education (pp. 401–407).Google Scholar
  18. Ellison, N., & Wu, Y. (2008). Blogging in the classroom: A preliminary exploration of student attitudes and impact on comprehension. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1), 99–122.Google Scholar
  19. Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2007). Constructing text:: Wiki as a toolkit for (collaborative?) learning, Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis (pp. 31–42). NY, USA: ACM New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garfinkel, H. (1994). Studies in ethnomethodology. Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public place. Glencoe: the free press, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66 (6_PART2), 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenberg, S., Roseman, M., Webster, D., & Bohnet, R. (1992). Issues and experiences designing and implementing two group drawing tools, Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1992, (Vol. 4 pp. 139–150). IEEE.Google Scholar
  25. Gunnarsson, B.L., & Alterman, R. (2013). Understanding promotions in a case study of student blogging, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 57–65). ACM.Google Scholar
  26. Gunnarsson, B.L., & Alterman, R. (2014). Peer promotions as a method to identify quality content. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 126–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 67–76). ACM.Google Scholar
  28. Harrison, S., & Tatar, D. (2008). Places: People, events, loci–the relation of semantic frames in the construction of place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 17(2-3), 97–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hymes, D. (1964). Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist, 1– 34.Google Scholar
  30. Impressionism (2016). Impressionism — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [Online; accessed 29-September-2016].Google Scholar
  31. Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A.F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in cscl. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the learning sciences, 4(1), 39–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2011). Using wikis for learning and knowledge building: Results of an experimental study. Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 138–148.Google Scholar
  34. Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S.D., & Greenberg, S. (2004). Roles of orientation in tabletop collaboration: Comprehension, coordination and communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 13(5-6), 501–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Larusson, J., & Alterman, R. (2009). Wikis to support the collaborative part of collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press.Google Scholar
  37. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, B. (2001). Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: Their roles in establishing common ground. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. Penguin.Google Scholar
  40. Mercier, E.M., Higgins, S.E., & Da Costa, L. (2014). Different leaders: Emergent organizational and intellectual leadership in childrens collaborative learning groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(4), 397–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2009). Wiki-supported learning and knowledge building: Effects of incongruity between knowledge and information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Collaborative knowledge building with wikis: The impact of redundancy and polarity. Computers & Education, 58 (4), 1049–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nowak, K. (2001). Defining and differentiating copresence, social presence and presence as transportation, Presence 2001 Conference (pp. 1–23). Philadelphia, PA: Citeseer.Google Scholar
  44. Oravec, J. (2002). Bookmarking the World: Weblog Applications in Education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(7), 616–621.Google Scholar
  45. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In Computer supported collaborative learning, pages 69–97. Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Sawyer, R.K. (2013). Qualitative methodologies for studying small groups. The international handbook of collaborative learning, 126–148.Google Scholar
  48. Schegloff, E. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 1295–1345.Google Scholar
  49. Schneider, B., & Pea, R. (2013). Real-time mutual gaze perception enhances collaborative learning and collaboration quality. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 375–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scott, S.D., Carpendale, M.S.T., & Inkpen, K.M. (2004). Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 294–303). ACM.Google Scholar
  51. Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. penguin.com.Google Scholar
  52. Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural psychology – what is it?. In Stigler, J. W., Shweder, R. A., & Herdt, G. E. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1–43). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sim, J., & Hew, K. (2010). The use of weblogs in higher education settings: A review of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soller, A. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 12, 40–62.Google Scholar
  55. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. Stahl, G. (2009). Studying Virtual Math Teams: Explorations of Group Cognition Vol. 11. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  57. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In Sawyer, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Stahl, G., Zhou, N., Cakir, M., & Sarmiento-Klapper, J. (2011). Seeing what we mean: Co-experiencing a shared virtual world, Proceedings of the 2011 Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conference, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
  59. Suchman, L., & Trigg, R. (1991). Understanding practice: Video as a medium for reflection and design. Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems, 65–89.Google Scholar
  60. Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for cscl. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Suthers, D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tang, J. (1991). Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-machine studies, 34(2), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Teasley, S., & Roschelle, J. (1993). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. Computers as cognitive tools, 229–258.Google Scholar
  64. Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Wainfan, L., & Davis, P.K. (2004). Challenges in virtual collaboration: Videoconferencing, audioconferencing, and computer-mediated communications. Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  66. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Whittaker, S., Brennan, S., & Clark, H. (1991). Co-ordinating activity: An analysis of interaction in computer-supported co-operative work, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching Through Technology (pp. 361–367). ACM.Google Scholar
  68. Williams, J., & Jacobs, J. (2004). Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(2), 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yeh, Y. -C. (2010). Analyzing online behaviors, roles, and learning communities via online discussions. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science Department, Volen Center for Complex SystemsBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations