Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cultural ways of constructing knowledge: the role of identities in online group discussions

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning scientists and the CSCL community have argued that knowledge construction is a process of collective thinking; a process that is simultaneously personal and social that requires group cognition. However, while CSCL researchers have investigated situated knowledge in the process of collective thinking, little work has been done to fully understand how different identification categories play a role in sense-making and knowledge construction. This research, therefore, explores in detail how individuals operationalize identification categories when they engage in group discussions in online learning environments. Results demonstrate that individuals do not experience online learning through only one aspect of their identity. Rather, learning experiences evoke different elements of their identities that are used continuously and simultaneously when they collaborate with each other in the phases of knowledge construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arvaja, M. (2012). Personal and shared experiences as resources for meaning making in a philosophy of science course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 85–108. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9137-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 448–459. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, S., Turnbull, W., & Carpendale, J. I. M. (2010). The Construction of Knowledge in Classroom Talk. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 358–402. doi:10.1080/10508406.2010.481013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (Trans: McGee, V.W.) (Second Printing). Austin: University of Texas Press.

  • Baym, N. (2009). What constitutes quality in qualitative internet research? In A. Markham & N. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 173–189). Thousands Oak: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bently, J. P. H., & Tinney, M. V. (2003). Does culture influence learning? A report on trends in learning styles and preferences across cultures. Presented at the The Annual Conference of the Association for Educational Communication & Technology, Anahaim, CA.

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond “identity.”. Theory and Society, 29(1), 1–47. doi:10.1023/A:1007068714468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2008). Introducing identity. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: MIT Press Journals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Thousands Oak: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousands Oak: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451–498. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography: Moral dilemmas of field research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(3), 267–294. doi:10.1177/089124193022003001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (2000). In D. Forgacs (Ed.), An Antonio gramsci reader: Selected writings 1916–1935. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X032005019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1996). Who needs “identity”? In P. du Gay & S. Hall (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). Thousands Oak: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (Trans: Macquarrie, J. & Robinson, E.). New York: Harper & Row.

  • Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 567–589. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1404_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Thousands Oak: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (2008). Social identity (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F., Chávez, A. F., Causarano, P.-N. L., & Causarano, A. (2011). Identity presence and knowledge building: Joint emergence in online learning environments? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 349–370. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9114-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.-J., & Bonk, C. J. (2006). Cross-cultural comparisons of online collaboration. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(1). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2002.tb00163.x.

  • Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1–23). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, H.-Y., Pan, C.-C., Tsai, M.-H., Tao, Y., & Cornell, R. A. (2004). The impact of instructional technology interventions on asian pedagogy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 88–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (enlarged, second edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ligorio, M. B., Loperfido, F. F., & Sansone, N. (2013). Dialogical positions as a method of understanding identity trajectories in a collaborative blended university course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3), 351–367. doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9174-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousands Oak: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., Eyre, G., & Harvey, R. (2005). What makes provision of e-learning successful? Charles Sturt University’s experience in Asia. Education for Information, 23(1), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, N. S., & Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41–61. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01027.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143–179. doi:10.1080/10508400801986108.

  • Nasir, N. S., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2005). Learning as a cultural process. In R. K. Sawyer & R. K. Sawyer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 489–504). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oztok, M. (2013). Tacit knowledge in online learning: Community, identity, and social capital. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(1), 21–36. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2012.720414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oztok, M. (2016). Reconceptualizing the pedagogical value of student facilitation. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 85–95. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.817440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oztok, M., & Brett, C. (2011). Social presence and online learning: A review of research. The Journal of Distance Education, 25(3). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/758/1299.

  • Oztok, M., Zingaro, D., & Makos, A. (2013). What social capital can tell us about social presence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), E203–E206. doi:10.1111/bjet.12079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oztok, M., Zingaro, D., Makos, A., Brett, C., & Hewitt, J. (2015). Capitalizing on social presence: The relationship between social capital and social presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 19–24. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovai, A. P., & Ponton, M. K. (2005). An examination of sense of classroom community and learning among African American and Caucasian graduate students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saukko, P. (2005). Methodologies for cultural studies: An integrative approach. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 343–356). Thousands Oak: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 76–98). Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. (2009). Paradigms of shared knowledge. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(4), 365–369. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9075-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, J. (1999). Thinking the internet: Cultural studies versus the millennium. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net (pp. 257–288). Thousands Oak: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom: Male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25(10), 805–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315–337. doi:10.1007/s11412-006-9660-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tee, M., & Karney, D. (2010). Sharing and cultivating tacit knowledge in an online learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(4), 385–413. doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9095-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Aalst, J. (2006). Rethinking the nature of online work in asynchronous learning networks. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 279–288. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00557.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 259–287. doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A., & Chiu, M. (2011). Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 445–470. doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9120-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44. doi:10.1080/10508400802581676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zingaro, D. (2012). Student moderators in asynchronous online discussion: A question of questions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching (JOLT), 8(3), 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YD, UK

    Murat Öztok

Authors
  1. Murat Öztok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Öztok.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Öztok, M. Cultural ways of constructing knowledge: the role of identities in online group discussions. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 11, 157–186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9233-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9233-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation