Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Black, E., Dawson, K., & Priem, J. (2008). Data for free: Using LMS activity logs to measure community in an online course. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 65–70.
Cacciamani, S., Cesareni, D., Martini, F., Ferrini, T., & Fujita, N. (2012). Influence of participation, facilitator styles, and metacognitive reflection on knowledge building in online university courses. Computers and Education, 58(3), 874–884.
Collazos, C. A., Guerrero, L. A., Pino, J. A., & Ochoa, S. F. (2002). Evaluating collaborative learning processes. In Groupware: Design, implementation, and use (pp. 203–221). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
De Laat, M. F., & Lally, V. (2004). It’s not so easy: Researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 165–171.
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6–28.
De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valke, M. (2010). Role as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 516–523.
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting in CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119–146.
Engel, D., Woolley, A. W., Jing, L. X., Chabris, C. F., & Malone, T. W. (2014). Reading the mind in the eyes or reading between the lines? Theory of Mind predicts collective intelligence equally well online and face-to-face. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e115212. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115212.
Fahy, P. J. (2001). Addressing some common problems in transcript analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(2). Retrieved October, 3rd, 2014 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/321/531
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66.
Fujita, N. (2013). Critical reflections on multivocal analyses and implications for design-based research. In D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. Rosé, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions (pp. 435–455). New York: Springer.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
Hare, A. P. (1994). Types of roles in small groups: A bit of history and a current perspective. Small Group Research, 25, 443–448.
Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117–136). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Hewitt, J. (2005). Towards an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 567–589.
Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for the support of distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 75–95.
Hickey, D. T., McWilliams, J., & Honeyford, M. (2011). Reading Moby-Dick in a participatory culture: Organizing assessment for engagement in a new media era. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 247–263.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 48–94.
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous & synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 4, 51–55.
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185.
Morris, M., & Ogan, C. (1996). The Internet as mass medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol1/issue4/morris.html.
Muukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K., & Lakkala, M. (2004). Computer-mediated progressive inquiry in higher education. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 28–53). Hershey: Information Science Publishing.
Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2001). Why lurkers lurk. Paper presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems. Boston. Retrieved from http://skeeter.socs.uoguelph.ca/~nonnecke//research/whylurk.pdf
O’ Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0. Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved from http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pontecorvo, C. (1987). Discussing for reasoning: The role of argument in knowledge construction. In E. De Corte, J. G. L. C. Lodewijks, R. Parmentier, & P. Span (Eds.), Learning and Instruction (pp. 71–82). Oxford: Leuven University Press.
Pozzi, F. (2011). The impact of scripted roles on online collaborative learning processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 471–484.
Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experience for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 201–223.
Salmon, G. (2000). E-Moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London, UK: Kogan Page.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 76–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge-building organizations. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today’s children, tomorrow’s society: The developmental Health and Wealth of Nations (pp. 274–289). New York: Guilford.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2002). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Reference, USA.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2010). A brief history of Knowledge Building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/574.
Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2005). The impact of role assignment on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups: A multilevel analysis. Small Group Research, 36, 704–745.
Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2007). Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learing, 2(2–3), 225–246.
Selwyn, N. (2012). I Social Media nell’educazione formale e informale tra potenzialità e realtà. Tecnologie didattiche, 20(1), 4–10.
Spada, H. (2010). Of scripts, roles, positions and models. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 547–550.
Spadaro, P. F., Sansone, N., & Ligorio, M. B. (2009). Role-taking for knowledge building in a blended learning course. Je-LKS, 5(3), 11–21.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Strijbos, J. W., & De Laat, M. F. (2010). Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 495–505.
Strijbos, J. W., & Weinberger, A. (2010). Emerging and scripted roles in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 491–494.
Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35(2), 195–229.
Teplovs, C., & Fujita, N. (2013). Socio-dynamic latent semantic learner models. In D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. Rosé, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions (pp. 382–396). New York: Springer.
Wallace, R. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication and Information, 3(2), 241–280.
Weinberger, A., Stegman, K., & Fisher, F. (2010). Learning to argue online: scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups not). Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 506–515.
Wise, A. F., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). Analyzing temporal patterns of knowledge construction in a role-based online discussion. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 445–470.
Wise, A. F., Saghafian, M., & Padmanabhan, P. (2012). Towards more precise design guidance: specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 55–82.
Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330, 686–688.
Xenos, M., & Foot, K. (2008). Not your father’s Internet: The generation gap in online politics. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 51–70). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in Knowledge-Building Communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.