Advertisement

Peer interaction and social network analysis of online communities with the support of awareness of different contexts

  • Jian-Wei Lin
  • Li-Jung Mai
  • Yung-Cheng Lai
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Although several studies related to social-context awareness (SA) and knowledge-context awareness (KA) argued that each (SA or KA) can individually enhance peer interaction in an online learning community, other studies reached opposite conclusions. These conflicting findings likely stem from different experimental settings. Most importantly, few studies have investigated the difference between the impacts of SA and KA under an identical experimental setting, which can be used to determine whether SA or KA better enhances peer collaboration. Restated, direct empirical comparisons of these two approaches are lacking. This work simultaneously investigates the impacts of SA and KA on quantitative and qualitative peer interaction and learning performance using the same experimental setting. Additionally, an underlying repeated-measurement design is applied to investigate peer interaction patterns and learning performance in SA and KA communities. Experimental results show that SA can stimulate more quantitative peer interaction than KA. However, both SA and KA have limited capacity to elicit qualified message content, even in a longitudinal experiment. Although the scores of SA and KA communities did not differ significantly on the first posttest, the SA community had significantly better learning performance on the second posttest, likely related to more extensive and frequent interaction among peers within the SA community.

Keywords

Computer-mediated communication Learning communities Evaluation of CAL systems 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan for the financial support under Grant No. 103-2410-H-231-002. The authors also would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.

References

  1. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2001). Investigations into help seeking and learning with a cognitive tutor. In R. Luckin (Ed.), Papers of the AIED-2001 Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments (pp. 47–58). Available via http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/aied2001/workshops.html.
  2. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnard, L., Lan, W., To, Y., Paton, V., & Lai, S. (2009). Measuring self-regulated in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodemer, D., & Dehler, J. (2011). Group awareness in CSCL environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1043–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buder, J. (2011). Group awareness tools for learning: current and future directions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1114–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadima, R., Ferreira, C., Monguet, J., Ojeda, J., & Fernandez, J. (2010). Promoting social network awareness: a social network monitoring system. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1233–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castillo, S., & Ayala, G. (2010). Content adaptation in mobile learning environments. International Journal of Multimedia Data Engineering and Management, 1(4), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chao, C. Y., Hwu, S. L., & Chang, C. C. (2011). Supporting interaction among participants of online learning using the knowledge sharing concept. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 311–319.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, C. M., & Chang, C. C. (2012). Mining learning social networks for cooperative learning with appropriate learning partners in a problem-based learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments. (Available online: 09 Feb 2012).Google Scholar
  10. Dawson, S. (2008). A study of the relationship between student social networks and sense of community. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 224–238.Google Scholar
  11. Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2011). Guiding knowledge communication in CSCL via group knowledge awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1068–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DiMicco, J., Hollenbach, K., Pandolfo, A., & Bender, W. (2007). The impact of increased awareness while face-to-face. Human Computer Interaction, 22, 47–96.Google Scholar
  13. Ehrlich, K., & Carboni, I. (2013). Inside social network analysis. Published in digital form at http://ppr.cs.dal.ca/sraza/files/social%20networks(1).pdf (Retrieved on 2013/12/5).
  14. El-Bishouty, M. M., Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2007). PERKAM: personalized knowledge awareness map for computer supported ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 122–134.Google Scholar
  15. El-Bishouty, M. M., Ogata, H., Rahman, S., & Yano, Y. (2010). Social knowledge awareness map for computer supported ubiquitous learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 27–37.Google Scholar
  16. Engel, A., Coll, C., & Bustos, A. (2013). Distributed teaching presence and communicative patterns in asynchronous learning: name versus reply networks. Computers & Education, 60(1), 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engelmann, T., Tergan, S., & Hesse, F. W. (2010). Evoking knowledge and information awareness for enhancing computer-supported collaborative problem solving. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(2), 268–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W. A. (2000). Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanneman, R. A., & Mark, R. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside. Published in digital form at. http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/ (Retrieved on 2013/4/22).
  20. Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heo, H., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1383–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janssen, J., & Bodemer, D. (2013). Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kanselaar, G., & Jaspers, J. (2007). Visualization of participation: does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49, 1037–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, W. L., & Cook. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York/London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2008). Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. US: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Lin, J. W., & Lai, Y. C. (2013a). Harnessing collaborative annotations on online formative assessments. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 263–274.Google Scholar
  28. Lin, J. W., & Lai, Y. C. (2013b). Online formative assessments with social network awareness. Computers & Education, 66, 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin, J. W., Lai, Y. C., & Chuang, Y. S. (2013). Timely diagnostic feedback for database concept learning. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 228–242.Google Scholar
  30. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Little, J. L., Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A., & Angello, G. (2012). Multiple-choice tests exonerated, at least of some charges fostering test-induced learning and avoiding test-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 23(11), 1337–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pear, J. J., & Crone-Todd, D. E. (2002). A social constructivist approach to computer-mediated instruction. Computers & Education, 38(1), 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pfeil, U., & Zaphiris, P. (2009). Investigating social network patterns within an empathic online community for older people. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1139–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2003). How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance-learning. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 343–352.Google Scholar
  35. Sangin, M., Molinari, G., Nüssli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2011). Facilitating peer knowledge modeling: effects of a knowledge awareness tool on collaborative learning outcomes and processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1059–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shi, Y., Frederiksen, C. H., & Muis, K. R. (2013). A cross-cultural study of self-regulated learning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 23, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Helms-Lorenz, M. (2013). The effects of inspecting and constructing part-task-specific visualizations on team and individual learning. Computers & Education, 60(1), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Soller, A., Martinez, A., Jermann, P. & Muehlenbrock, M. (2005). From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 261–290.Google Scholar
  39. Vrocharidou, A., & Efthymiou, I. (2012). Computer mediated communication for social and academic purposes: profiles of use and university students’ gratifications. Computers & Education, 58(1), 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang, T. H. (2011). Developing web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1801–1812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang, S. J. H., Chen, I. Y. L., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2007). Enhancing the quality of e-learning in virtual learning communities by finding quality learning content and trustworthy collaborators. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 84–95.Google Scholar
  43. Yuan, Y., Fulk, J., Shumate, M., Monge, P. R., Bryant, J. A., & Matsaganis, M. (2005). Individual participation in organizational information commons: the impact of team level social influence and technology-specific competence. Human Communication Research, 31(2), 212–240.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International BusinessChien Hsin University of Science and TechnologyTaoyuanTaiwan
  2. 2.College of General StudiesYuan Ze UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options