Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns of kindergarten children’s social interaction with peers in the computer area

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explored how young children interact with their peers in the computer area of a public kindergarten classroom. Children’s social interaction, as defined in this study, is the action of giving and taking information that results in children’s knowledge construction and cognitive development that can be accomplished through peer-to-peer interactions. This kind of social interaction is referred to as “Cognitively Effective Social Interaction (CESI)” in this paper. Patterns of young children’s social interaction with peers in the computer area of this classroom were discussed. Two teachers and 28 children in a full-day kindergarten classroom were observed and interviewed. The patterns of young children’s social interaction that occurred in the computer area were described as parallel play, verbal conflicts, sociable interaction, knowledge construction through positive and negative processes, and non-verbal communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, A., & Casement, C. (2000). The child and the machine. Beltsville, MD: Robins Lane Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003). Strip mining for gold: Research and policy in educational technology-A response to “Fool’s Gold.” Educational Technology Review, 11(1), Retrieved July 25, 2004 from www.aace.org/pubs/etr/issue4/clements2.pdf.

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summary research on the building blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 136–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colker, L. J. (2011). Technology and learning: What early childhood educators have to say. Teaching Young Children, 4(3), 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, T. A., & Greene, B. A. (2011). Preservice teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and motivation about technology integration. Journal of Eduational Computing Research, 45(1), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkind, D. (1985). The impact of computer use on cognitive development in young children: A theoretical analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. A., Feenstra, E., Ryon, E., & McNeill, D. (2011). A multimodal approach to coding discourse: Collaboration, distributed cognition, and geometric reasoning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 253–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fesakis, G., Sofroniou, C., & Mavroudi, E. (2011). Using the internet for communicative learning activities in kindergarten: The case of the “Shapes Planet. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(5), 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelmini-Hornsby, G., Ainsworth, S., & O’Malley, C. (2011). Guided reciprocal questioning to support children’s collaborative storytelling. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 577–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimbert, B., & Cristol, D. (2004). Teaching curriculum with technology: Enhancing children’s competence during early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 31(3), 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenhagen, C. (2012). Making rounds: The routine work of the teacher during collaborative learning with computers. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 11–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, A. (2011). Cybersafety in early childhood education. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Hand book of qualitative research (pp. 163–194). New Delhi: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugland, S. W. (2005). Selecting or upgrading software and web sites in the classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(5), 329–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutinger, P., & Johanson, J. (2000). Implementing and maintaining an effective early childhood comprehensive technology system. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(3), 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, E., & Davis, G. (2005). Kindergarteners’ conversations in a computer-based technology classroom. Communication Education, 54(2), 118–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, G. (2010). Animation and grammer in science education: Learners’ construal of animated educational software. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(2), 167–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). Early childhood teachers’ misconceptions about mathematics education for young children in the United States. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. (2012). Application of a model for the integration of technology in kindergarten: An empirical investigation in Taiwan. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, R. (2010). Computers and young children. Canadian Children, 35(1), 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarrick, K., & Li, X. (2007). Buried treasure: The impact of computer use on young children’s social, cognitive, language development and motivation. AACE Journal, 15(1), 73–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1989). Microcomputers in classrooms: Educational technology or social practice? Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 20, 4–22. doi:10.1525/aeq.1989.20.1.05x12081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAEYC (2012). Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. p. 5.

  • Nir-Gal, O., & Klein, P. S. (2004). Computers for cognitive development in early childhood-The teacher’s role in the computer learning environment. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 97–119.

  • Perez-Sanagustin, M., et al. (2012). 4SPPIces: A case study of factors in a scripted collaborative-learning blended course across spatial locations. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(3).

  • Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problemsolving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69–97). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Siyahhan, S., Barab, S. A., & Downton, M. P. (2010). Using activity theory to understand intergenerational play: The case of Family Quest. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specht, J., Wood, E., & Willoughby, T. (2002). What early childhood educators need to know about computers in order to enhance the learning environment. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 28(1), 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, C., & Plowman, L. (2008). Enhancing learning with information and communication technologies in pre-school. Early Childhood Development and Care, 178(6), 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, A. K. (2000). Computers in school: Socially isolating or a tool to promote collaboration? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, S., & Wright, J. L. (2003). Major trends and issues in early childhood education: Challenges, controversies, and insights. NY: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Alliance for Childhood (2004). Tech tonic: Towards a new literacy of technology. Retrieved Feb 2, 2012 from http://www.scribd.com/doc/19264/Tech-Tonic-Towards-a-new-literacy-of-technology.

  • Vernadakis, N., Avgerinos, A., Tsitskari, E., & Zachopoulou, E. (2005). The use of computer assisted instruction in preschool education: Making teaching meaningful. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(2), 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. Van der veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Kinzie, M., McGuire, P., & Pan, E. (2010). Applying technology to inquiry-based learning in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E. (2010). A is for Avatar: Young children in literacy 2.0 worlds and literacy 1.0 schools. Language Arts, 88(2), 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, S., & Flewitt, R. (2010). New technologies, new multimodal literacy practices and young children’s metacognitive development. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(4), 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelland, N. (2011). Reconceptualising play and learning in the lives of young children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, R. (2007). Digital natives come to preschool: Implications for early childhood practice. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(1), 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun Mee Lim.

Appendices

Appendix A. Sample Excerpt from Observation

Feb. 3. 2008 (4:00–5:00 pm) Edu-Care classroom (Teacher A)

Child ID

Activity

Etc.

Child I

• Drawing board program

Com1. I

• Drew people and many lines, and then erased lines…

Com2. C

Child C

• Upside down the sand watch

Com2. D&F stand back

• Child D & F in. looked C’s screen

Child D

“You don’t mean to color black there?”

 

Child F

“Why? It’s cute!”

 

Child C

“A dinosaur is always cute!”

D&F out

• Drawing a dinosaur. Filling out with colors.

• Saved in “My document-Our works”

Child D

• D came in.

 

“C drew a monster!”

• D, went out.

Child L

“What are you doing?”

 

• Nobody answered and L went out.

Child C

“all done!”

 

• Saved a file name[ltkejowsksg]. just typed anything, but it was not a word.

Teacher A

“What were you doing?”(to Child C)

 

Child C

“A monster!”

 

Teacher A

“A monster?”

 

Child C

“Yes!”

C out

• (to Child I)”Hey! [ltkejowsksg] is mine!”

Child I

• Looked at Child C’s screen, “Hahahaha~!”

 

• Now Child I started imitating Child C. drew people and a sun. filling out with colors. Mistakenly all screen was filled with blue. (I intended to color only people with blue, but a small gap allowed colors to spread to all screen)

Child K

“Hey! How come everything is blue! Hahaha…”

K passed by

• Child I laughed together.

Teacher A

• Without C’s request, Teacher A saved C’s work in a new folder [Drawing board save].

 

“Next time, you can find your file here!”

<Teacher A saved it so fast. The interaction between a teacher and a child was not occurred.>

• Saved Child I’s work also in this folder that Teacher A had just created. A file name is “Child I’s name”

Child I

• Drew many zigzag lines, and then erased with an eraser tool. With a spray tool, started drawing a face.

 

Child C

• Drew a house and filled out with colors again.

Child C out

• Saved this in My document-our works rather than a new folder [drawing board save] that Teacher A had created. A file name was [ghlrkgkrkrqqqqqgkskm] “I’m done!”

Teacher A

“I! Your computer time is over, right?”

 

Child I

“huh?”

 

Teacher A

“Child C & I started together, so finish computer work now.”

C&I out

Child D & F

• Went to com1 together.

Com2. Child L

“Teacher! Can we work together?”

Com1. Child D

Child F stood back of D

Child D

“I will draw universe!”

 

Child F

“Ok! Universe on a black background!”

 

• Brought a chair and put it next to Child D’s chair. Child D&F are both in front of com 1.

Child D

• Drew many big and little circles on black background

 

Child L

• Scrolled up and down very well. Searching internet.

 

“Where is Dora? A-Hu..”

Child D

• Stood and looked at Child L,

 

“You shouldn’t play games in that computer! There (pointed at L’s screen)! Story Book!”

Child G

“Yahoo Hogan! Enter Yahoo Hogan!”

Stood back of Child L

Child L

“I’m looking for Dora Dora!”

 

• Clicked many things on the left. Entered Bookey story book, but didn’t like it. Selected Korean traditional story.

Child D

• Lined Saturn.

 

• Child F got a mouse again and then drew lines continuously. Child F put her name card on a computer body.

 

“brown?”

• Child D filled out a screen with a black.

Child F

• Filled out with brown and finally completed Saturn.

 

Child G

“Oh! It’s Saturn!”

 

Teacher A

“It seems Saturn!”

 

Child D & F

Filled out every blank with black.

 

Child D

“Let’s name it ‘Saturn’”

 

Child F

“Ok! Save as a different name! my pictures! A file name is ‘Saturn’ !”

 

Child D

“Teacher! After writing a title, go to a windows background screen, right?”

 

Teacher A

“Right! Go to a background screen and then open “drawing board save” and saved it as [picture Saturn – Child D & F]. Let me write a helper Child F next to Child D’s name.”

 

Child D

“Here! Here! With this spray tool (pointed with D’s finger)!”

 

Child F

• Clicked a spray tool with a mouse.

 

Child D

• Erased some circles with a spray tool.

 

• Looked back. To child G,

“Are you looking at this?”

Child G

• Played in a block area. “Huh?”

 

Child D

“Looking at THIS?”

 

Child L

• Selected Story book.

 

Child D

• Stood up and looked at G’s screen,

 

“Let me see this for a second!”

• Drew a picture again and asked,

“What are you doing?”

Child F

“Done! Like this?”

 

• Filled out a blank but mistakenly colored unintended to color on unwanted spots.

“Teacher! This is weird.”

• Drew an earth. Green land and blue sea.

Child C

“No! There should be any hole. Ok!”

 

Child F

“This! This one! Do this like this!”

F out

Appendix B. Sample Questions of Children Interview

  1. 1.

    When you interacted with your friends, how was your feeling?

  2. 2.

    What did you newly gain after interacting with your friend? Is there any new information or new ideas that you learned from your friend?

  3. 3.

    When you were playing with your friends at the computer area, what things got in the way of expressing your ideas to other friends?

  4. 4.

    Please briefly describe what you did to help your friends create their own artifacts.

Appendix C. Sample Questions of Teacher Interview

  1. 1.

    How to scaffold children to interact each other in the computer area of this kindergarten classroom?

  2. 2.

    Please explain your teaching experience, how many years have you taught and where have you been a teacher?

  3. 3.

    Could you please explain the interaction patterns between children and peers, and teacher’s interpretation about children’s interaction in the computer areas?

  4. 4.

    Have you ever taken any college course that is related to computer technology in early childhood education?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, E.M. Patterns of kindergarten children’s social interaction with peers in the computer area. Computer Supported Learning 7, 399–421 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9152-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9152-1

Keywords

Navigation