Abstract
We present an instructional model involving a computer-supported collaborative learning environment, in which students from two conflicting groups collaboratively investigate an event relevant to their past using historical texts. We traced one enactment of the model by a group comprised of two Israeli Jewish and two Israeli Arab students. Our data sources included the texts participants wrote—pre-, post- and during the activity, jointly and individually—the transcripts of the e-discussion and reflections written after the activity. The setting enabled us to further our understanding of what collaboration means when students’ voices do not converge. We examined whether the activity was productive in terms of learning, and the dynamics of collaboration within the milieu, especially the intersubjective meaning making. The e-discussion that was co-constructed by participants was a chain of disagreements. However, participants’ reflections reveal that the group structure and the e-communication method were perceived as affording sensitive collaboration. Furthermore, a comparison between the individual texts, pre- and post- the group discussion, revealed that the activity was productive, since students moved from a one-sided presentation of the event to a more multi-sided representation. Based on the analysis of the e-discussion, we conclude that the setting provided students with opportunities to examine their voices in light of alternatives. We propose the term fission to articulate certain moments of intersubjectivity, where a crack is formed in one’s voice as the Other’s voice impacts it, and one’s voice become more polyphonic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See the report by the public committee appointed in 2008 by the Israeli Minister of Education to define state policy in the field of education for a shared life for Arabs and Jews. URL: http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Owl/Hebrew/HoraotNehalim/VaadotUpeiluyot/VaadatSE/VehaadatMeshotafim.htm (The document is in Hebrew. An executive summary in English in pages 45–48.)
All the texts are translated from Hebrew
The term pra’ot (in Hebrew) is used in many Hebrew sources to refer to violent events against the Jewish people, such the pogroms of 1882 in Russia.
These 26 messages encompassed a total of 94 utterances.
References
Alison, R., & Luke, H. (2009). The wiki way of learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 135–152.
Al-Kayyali, A. W. (Ed.). (1971). Tarikh Filastin al-Hadith (The History of Modern Palestine). Beirut: Institute for Palestine Studies.
Allport, G. W. (1954/1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), article 7. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/amichai-hamburger.html.
Augar, N., Raitman, R., & Zhou, W. (2004). Teaching and learning online with wikis. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 95–104). Perth, 5–8 December. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/augar.html.
Ayyad, A. (1999). Arab Nationalism and the Palestinians (1850–1939). Retrieved from http://www.passia.org/publications/research_studies/books/arab_nationalism/index.html.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Edited and translated by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1991). Dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Chambliss, M. J., & Garner, R. (1996). Do adults change their minds after reading persuasive text? Written Communications, 13(3), 291–313.
Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, 873 & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Hyattsville, MD: 874 American Psychological Association.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.
Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. A. (1994). Social psychology research on beliefs and attitudes: Implications for research on learning from text. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 254–264). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Forte, F., & Bruckman, A. (2006). From Wikipedia to the classroom: exploring online publication and learning. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Bloomington, IN, June 2006.
Kolinsky, M. (1990). Premeditation in the Palestine Disturbances of August 1929? Middle Eastern Studies, 26(1), 18–22.
Koschmann, T. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin’s contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. CSCL ‘99, Stanford, CA.
Lang, Y. (1988). The events of 1929. Disturbance, riot, or uprising? Cathedra, 47, 134–154 (in Hebrew).
Maoz, I. (2000). Power relations in inter-group encounters: A case study of Jewish-Arab encounters in Israel. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 259–277.
Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(1), 25–45.
Matusov, E. (2001). Intersubjectivity as a way of informing teaching design for a community of learners classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(4), 383–402.
Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers.
Matusov, E., & von Duyke, K. (2010). Bakhtin’s notion of the Internally Persuasive Discourse in education: Internal to what? (A case of discussion of issues of foul language in teacher education). In K. Junefelt & P. Nordin (Eds.), Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on Perspectives and Limits of Dialogism in Mikhail Bakhtin, Stockholm University, Sweden June 3–5, 2009 (pp. 174–199). Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Mollov, B., Schwartz, D., Steinberg, G., & Lavie, C. (2001). The impact of Israeli-Palestinian intercultural dialogue: virtual and face to face, presented at the International Association for Conflict Management Annual Conference, Cergy, France, June, 24–27.
Peck, C., Poyntz, S., & Seixas, P. (2005). ‘Agency’ in students’ narratives of Canadian history. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Montreal).
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact: Theory, research and new perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
Pifarré, M., Argelagós, E., & Guijosa, A. (2010). Using the affordances of Wiki to support collaborative argumentation in secondary science education. In D. S. Beckett (Ed.), Secondary education in the 21st century. NY: Nova Publishers.
Reynolds, R. R., Taylor, M. S., Steffensen, M. S., Shirey, L. L., & Anderson, R. C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 353–366.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). Construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning. New York: Springer.
Salomon, G. (2004). A narrative-based view of coexistence education. Journal of Social Issues, 60(2), 273–287.
Seixas, P. (1993). Historical understanding among adolescents in a multicultural setting. Curriculum Inquiry, 23(3), 301–327.
Stephan, C. W., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Zelniker, T., & Stephan, W. G. (2004). Introduction to improving Arab-Jewish relations in Israel: Theory and practice in coexistence educational programs. Journal of Social Issues, 60(2), 237–252.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 1(3), 315–337.
Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., & Van der Linden, J. L. (2005). Historical reasoning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. In A. M. O’Donnell, C. E. Hmelo, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning and technology (pp. 266–297). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. NY: Oxford University Press.
Wertsch, J. (2000). Is it possible to teach beliefs, as well as knowledge about history? In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history (pp. 38–50). New York: New York University Press.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Acknowledgments
Our thanks go to Dr. Kassem Darawsha for his help on this project, and to our students, Rina, Mona, Hiya and Moti for opening their minds to us. This study was supported by the Israeli Science Foundation, grant no. 1236/09.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pollack, S., Ben-David Kolikant, Y. Collaboration amidst disagreement and moral judgment: The dynamics of Jewish and Arab students’ collaborative inquiry of their joint past. Computer Supported Learning 7, 109–128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9138-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9138-4