Abstract
The purpose of the present paper is to examine the relations between Carl Bereiter’s and Marlene Scardamalia’s knowledge-building approach and social practices. It is argued that technology enhances learning through transformed social practices. In order to truly contribute to educational transformation, pedagogical approaches have to be embedded in locally cultivated “knowledge practices” that channel the participants’ intellectual efforts in a way that elicits collective advancement of knowledge. Consequently, knowledge advancement is not just about putting students’ ideas into the centre but depends on corresponding transformation of social practices of working with knowledge. Creation of cultures which advance knowledge presupposes sustained efforts of teacher-practitioners, collaborating with students and researchers, aimed at iteratively transforming prevailing knowledge practices toward more innovative ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird, D. (2004). Thing knowledge: A philosophy of scientific instruments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Béguin, P., & Rabardel, P. (2000). Designing for instrument-mediated activity. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 12, 173–190.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987a). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987b). An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing. Curriculum Inquiry, 17, 9–30.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves. An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unraveling basic components and dimensions (pp. 55–68). (Advances in Learning and Instruction Series). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 301–329.
Bohman, J. (1999). Practical reason and cultural constraint: Agency in Bourdieu’s theory of practice. In R. Shusterman (Ed.), Bourdieu: A critical reader (pp. 129–152). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cussins, A. (1992). Content, embodiment, and objectivity: The theory of cognitive trials. Mind, 101, 651–688.
Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
De Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domain. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179–201.
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2006). Development, movement, and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Building activity theory in practice: toward the next generation (pp. 1–43). Kansai University: Technical reports 1.
Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to work: The Change Laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363–382). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (in press). From learning environments and implementation to activity systems and expansive learning, Interacting with Computers.
Engeström, Y., & Blackler, F. (2005b). On the life of object. Organization, 12, 307–330.
Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The Change Laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 2, 10–17.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells, & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st Century. Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 211–224). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Engeström, Y., Puonti, L., & Seppänen, L. (2003). Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 151–186). London: Sharpe.
Gruber, H. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd ed.) Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
Hakkarainen, K. (1998). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Toronto.
Hakkarainen, K. (2003a). Can cognitive explanations be eliminated? Science & Education, 12, 671–689.
Hakkarainen, K. (2003b). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6, 199–220.
Hakkarainen, K. (2003c). Progressive inquiry in computer-supported biology classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1072–1088.
Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Pursuit of explanation within a computer-supported classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 979–996.
Hakkarainen, K. (2008). Toward a trialogical approach to learning: Personal reflections. LLine – Lifelong Learning in Europe, 13, 22–29.
Hakkarainen, K., & Sintonen, M. (2002). Interrogative model of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Science & Education, 11, 25–43.
Hakkarainen, K., Lonka, K., & Lipponen, L. (1999). Progressive inquiry: Overcoming constraints of human intelligent activity (in Finnish). Helsinki: WSOY.
Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., & Järvelä, S. (2002). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann, N. Miyake, & R. Hall (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying Forward the Conversation (pp. 129–156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hakkarainen, K., Lonka, K., & Paavola, S. (2004a). Networked intelligence: How artifacts and communities expand intellectual resources. A paper presented at the Scandinavian Summer Cruise at the Baltic Sea (theme: Motivation, Learning and Knowledge Building in the 21st Century), June 18–21, 2004 (Organized by Karoliniska Institutet, EARLI SIG Higher Education, and IKIT). Available at: http://www.lime.ki.se/uploads/images/517/Hakkarainen_Lonka_Paavola.pdf.
Hakkarainen, K., Paavola, S., & Lipponen, L. (2004b). From communities of practice to innovative knowledge communities. LLine – Lifelong Learning in Europe, 9(2), 74–83.
Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004c). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hakkarainen, K., Muukkonen, H., Markkanen, H., & the KP-Lab Research Community (2006). Design principles for the Knowledge-Practices Laboratory (KP-Lab) project. In S. Barab, K. Hay, & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2006 (pp. 934–935). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hakkarainen, K., Bollström-Huttunen, M., & Hoffman, R. (2008). Teacher-researcher dialogue and expansive transformation of pedagogical practices. Digital Kompetanse (Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy), 3, 156–177.
Hakkarainen, K., Lallimo, J., Toikka, S. & White, H. (2009). Cultivating collective expertise within innovative knowledge-practice networks. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning in social practices. ICT and new artifacts—transformation of social and cultural practices. EARLI series: Advances in Learning. Pergamon (in press).
Hedegaard, M., & Chaiklin, S. (2005). Radical-local teaching and learning. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
Hektner, J., Schmidt, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hewitt, J. (1996). Progress toward a knowledge building community. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Education, University of Toronto.
Hintikka, J. (1999). Inquiry as inquiry: A logic of scientific discovery. Selected papers of Jaakko Hintikka (vol. 5). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hoppe, U. (2007). Educational information technologies and collaborative learning. In U. Hoppe, H. Ogata, & A. Soller (Eds.), The role of technology in CSCL: Studies in technology enhance collaborative learning (pp. 1–12). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Volume 9. New York: Springer.
Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2007). The Artifact Project - History, Science, and Design Inquiry in Technology Enhanced Learning at Elementary Level. Special Issue of Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2, 213–237.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practices. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175–188). London: Routledge.
Kolodner, J. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lesson learned from an inquiry in science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 1–31.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Hartfordshire, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986, originally published 1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2005). Object lessons. Organization, 12, 331–355.
Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (1997). Developing culture of inquiry in computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.): In R. Hall, N. Miyake & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL '97: The Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (pp. 164–168). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Available at: http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/cscl/papers/lasse.pdf
Miettinen, R., & Virkkunen, J. (2006). Learning in and for working and the joint construction of mediational artefacts: An activity theoretical view. In E. Antonacopoulou, P. Jarvis, V. Andersen, B. Elkjaer, & S. Høyrup (Eds.), Learning, working, & living: Mapping the terrain of working life learning (pp. 154–167). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Muukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K., Inkinen, M., Lonka, K., Salmela-Aro, K. (2008). CASS-methods and tools for investigating higher education knowledge practices. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. Kirschner, & F. Prins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference for the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Volume 2 (pp. 107–115). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: politics, bodies, and signs in the educational process. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (2004). Introduction: Toward a practice-based view of knowledge and learning in organization. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organization: A practice-based approach (pp. 3–31). London: M. E. Sharpe.
Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How school remakes mind and society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, D. (2007). Jerome Bruner: The cognitive revolution in educational theory. Continuum Library of Educational Thought, Volume (vol. 3). New York: Continuum.
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). “Trialogical” processes of mediation through conceptual artefacts. A paper presented at the Scandinavian Summer Cruise at the Baltic Sea (theme: Motivation, Learning and Knowledge Building in the 21st Century), June 18–21, 2004. Available at: http://www.lime.ki.se/uploads/images/537/Baltic2004_Paavola _Hakkarainen.pdf.
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005a). The knowledge creation metaphor – An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 537–557.
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005b). Three abductive solutions to the learning paradox—instinct, inference, and distributed cognition. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 24, 235–253.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Modeling innovative knowledge communities: A knowledge-creation approach to learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557–576.
Perez, C. (2002). Technological revolution and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden age. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2000). Event sampling and other methods for studying daily experience. In H. T. Reis, & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190–222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rheinberger, H. J. (1997). Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Roth, W.-M. (2002). Being and becoming in classroom. New York: Ablex.
Roth, W.-M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Scardamalia, M. (1999). Moving ideas to the center. In L. Harasim (Ed.), Wisdom & Wizardry: Celebrating the pioneers of online education (pp. 14–15). Vancouver, BC: Telelearning Inc.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37–68.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265–283.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge-building organizations. In D. Keating, & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Today’s children, tomorrow’s society: The development of health and wealth of nations (pp. 274–289). New York: Guildford.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–115). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetinas, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Engeström, R., Kangas, K., Bollström-Huttunen, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). The Artifact Project: Hybrid Knowledge Building in a Networked Learning Environment. A paper presented at the Summer Institute of the Institution of Knowledge Innovation and Technology (IKIT), 10–14 of August, 2004, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo M., & Hakkarainen K. (2009). Learning by Collaborative Designing: Technology-enhanced Knowledge Practices. International Journal of Design and Technology Education (in press).
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Skagestad, P. (1993). Thinking with machines: Intelligence Augmentation, Evolutionary Epistemology, and Semiotic. The Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 16(2), 157–180.
Sterelny, K. (2004). Externalism, epistemic artifacts, and the extended mind. In R. Schantz (Ed.), The externalist challenge (pp. 239–254). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of innovation: Change and meaning in the age of the Internet. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Vérillon, P. & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1).
Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas of building shared transformative agency. @ctivites, 3, 43–66.
Virkkunen, J., & Ahonen, H. (2007). Learning in transformation: A new instrument for renewing learning practices (in Finnish). Vantaa: Infor.
Vygotski, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Acknowledgements
The present investigation emerged in the context of research and development of the Knowledge-Practices Laboratory (www.kp-lab.org, FP6-2004-IST-4, an integrated project 27490, 2006-2011) funded by the Information Society Technologies (IST) program of the European Community. A research grant provided by the Research Council of Culture and Society of the Academy of Finland for “Collective intelligence: How shared ‘trialogical’ knowledge practices augment human cognitive capabilities” (2008–2010, number 121207, PI Hakkarainen) also supported writing of the article. I would like to thank Carl Bereiter, Ritva Engeström, Yrjö Engeström, Kirsti Lonka, Reijo Miettinen, Sami Paavola, Marlene Scardamalia, Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, Jaakko Virkkunen, and Hal White for valuable comments concerning the issues addressed in the present article. The arguments and opinions provided are my own and do not necessarily correspond to those of the KP-Lab consortium or the funding agencies mentioned above.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hakkarainen, K. A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. Computer Supported Learning 4, 213–231 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9064-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9064-x