Skip to main content

Genre and CSCL: The form and rhetoric of the online posting

Abstract

Genre analysis, the investigation of typified communicative actions arising in recurrent situations, has been developed to study information use and interchange online, in businesses and in other organizations. As such, it holds out promise for the investigation of similarly typified communicative actions and situations in CSCL contexts. This study explores this promise, beginning with an overview of ways that genre analysis has been adapted and applied in related areas: in the study of group behavior in organizations, and of evolving and proliferating communicative forms, actions, and situations on the Internet (e-mails, blogs, FAQs, etc.). Focusing on the particular genre of the Internet “posting” in CSCL contexts, the paper hypothesizes that the educational use of this genre bears recognizable similarities with its generic antecedent, the letter. In testing this hypothesis, the paper describes a pilot case study of a set of CSCL postings (n = 136), which attempts to quantify the occurrence of rhetorical characteristics common to both the epistolary and CSCL “genres.” This content analysis shows the recurrence in this sample of a range of rhetorical markers (240 in total) that are characteristic of epistolary dynamics. It concludes by considering the implications of these findings and of a “genre approach” for CSCL research generally, and for community of inquiry models in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. At the same time, it is also important to note one way in which this application of “epistolarity” has departed or diverged from the examples provided in history and specifically in the analyses of Altman herself. This divergence is underscored by Altman’s aforementioned description of the characteristics of epistolarity as “charged with paradox and contradiction,” with any one trait invoking its opposite (e.g., the letter as a “distance maker” also functioning as a “distance breaker”). What the analyses above indicate, however, is that only one side of paradoxically charged characteristics such as “distance maker/distance breaker” or “continuity/discontinuity” is generally evident. The example adapted from the transcript and provided in table one, above, is indicative of this: “I’m glad to read, Marge, that you were able to integrate student needs in that way. I hope you continue to….” The characteristics of epistolarity are clearly evident here in their positive sense—acting as a bridge between writer and addressee, establishing continuity and connection between messages—but not so much in the more negative sense of emphasizing discontinuity between postings or the distance separating reader and writer. The example of epistolary communication from Rourke cited earlier suggests a reason for this: When Ruth thanks her classmate Jacques and exclaims that they share the same frustration—in wondering what happens after pressing ‘“Send!”’—the “distance breaking” and “discontinuity” that is evident arises from uncertainty over technical issues, which become less pressing as technology and ways of utilizing it become more familiar and established.

References

  • Altman, J. G. (1982). Epistolarity: Approaches to a form. Columbus: Ohio State UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, R. (1999). Film/Genre. London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2007). The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 427–435. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. A. (1992). Popular culture genres: Theories and texts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, R., & Marshall, P. D. (2003). Web theory: An introduction. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A., & Gushrowski, B. (2000). Genres and the Web: is the personal home page the first uniquely digital genre? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 202–205. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<>3.0.CO;2-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahy, P. J. (2005). Two methods for assessing critical thinking in computer-mediated communications (CMC) transcripts. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(3). Accessed March 14, 2008 from: http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Mar_05/article02.htm.

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwaśnik, B. H., & Crowston, K. (2005). Introduction to the special issue: Genres of digital documents. Information Technology & People, 18(2), 76–88. doi:10.1108/09593840510601487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, D. 2008. Coding for content analysis. Accessed April 29, 2008, from: http://www.audiencedialogue.net/kya16b.html

  • Meyer, K. A. (2004). Evaluating online discussions: Four different frames of analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8, 2. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/JALN/v8n2/pdf/v8n2_meyer.pdf

  • Milne, E. (2003). Email and epistolary technologies: Presence, intimacy, disembodiment Fibreculture: Internet Theory + Criticism + Research (2). http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue2/issue2_milne.html

  • OED [Oxford English Dictionary]. (2007). Oxford, UK: Oxford UP. Accessed April 27, 2008, from: http://www.oed.com/

  • Rourke, L. (2005). Learning through online discussion. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta. Unpublished dissertation.

  • Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2007). Barriers to online critical discourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 2(1), 105–126. doi:10.1007/s11412-007-9007-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In the Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 1370–1373, 2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan. Also available online: http://ikit.org/fulltext/inpressKB.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S. (1997). Modes of thinking and ways of speaking: Culture and logic reconsidered. In S. Scribner, & E. Tolbach (Eds.), Mind and social practice: Selected writings of Sylvia Scribner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traudt, P. J. (2005). An introduction to the study of media: Content and audience analysis. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnhagen, S., Wilson, D., Krupa, E., Kasprzak, S., & Hunting, V. (2005). Comparison of student experiences with different online graduate courses in health promotion. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(1). Accessed April 29, 2008 from: http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol31.1/varnhagen.html

  • Wagner, W.-R. (2004). Medienkompetenz revisited: Medien als werkzeuge der weltaneignung: ein pädagogisches programm. Munich: kopaed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 46(1), 71–95. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia contributors (2008). “Blog,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Accessed January 20, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blog&oldid=185666105.

  • Wise, A., Chang, J., Duffy, T., & del Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence of student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Embracing Diversity in the Learning Sciences: Proceedings of ICLS 2004. June 22–26 Santa Monica: University of California Los Angeles.

  • Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299–326. doi:10.2307/258774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylönen, S. (2001). Entwicklung von Textsortenkonventionen am Beispiel von ′Originalarbeiten′ der Deutschen Medizinischen Wochenschrift (DMW). Leipziger Fachsprachen-Studien (15). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norm Friesen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friesen, N. Genre and CSCL: The form and rhetoric of the online posting. Computer Supported Learning 4, 171–185 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9060-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9060-1

Keywords

  • CSCL
  • Epistolary form
  • Genre analysis
  • Content analysis
  • Rhetorical analysis