Abstract
A common challenge in many situations of computer-supported collaborative learning is increasing the willingness of those involved to share their knowledge with other group members. As a prototypical situation of computer-supported information exchange, a shared-database setting was chosen for the current study. This information-exchange situation represented a social dilemma: while the contribution of information to a shared database induced costs and provided no benefit for the individual, the entire group suffered when all members decided to withhold information. In order to alleviate the information-exchange dilemma, a group-awareness tool was employed. It was hypothesized that participants would use group awareness for self-presentational purposes. For the examination of this assumption, the personality variable ‘protective self-presentation’ (PSP) was measured. An interaction effect of group awareness and PSP was found: when an awareness tool provided information concerning the contribution behavior of each individual, this tool was used as a self-presentation opportunity. In order to understand this effect in more detail, single items of the PSP-scale were analyzed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantages in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 150–169.
Barkhi, R. (2005). Information exchange and induced cooperation in group decision support systems. Communication Research, 32, 646–678.
Begole, J., Rosson, M. B., & Shaffer, C. A. (1999). Flexible collaboration transparency: Supporting worker independence in replicated application-sharing systems. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 6(2), 95–132.
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15, 365–388.
Briggs, R. O. (2006). On theory-driven design and deployment of collaboration systems. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 64, 573–582.
Brewer, B. W., Diehl, N. S., Cornelius, A. E., Joshua, M. D., & Van Raalte, J. L. (2004). Exercising caution: Social physique anxiety and protective self-presentational behaviour. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport / Sports Medicine Australia, 7(1), 47–55.
Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. F. (2002). Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23, 687–710.
Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Rossen, M. B., & McCrickard, D. S. (2003). Notification and awareness: Synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 58, 605–632.
Cress, U. (2005). Ambivalent effect of member portraits in virtual groups. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 281–291.
Cress, U., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). The social complexity in establishing and sharing information resources. In J. Elen, & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Research and theory (pp. 67–87). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2007a). Guidelines and feedback in information exchange: Behavioral anchors and descriptive norms in a social dilemma. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 42–53.
Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2007b). Endowment heterogeneity and identifiability in the information-exchange dilemma. Computers in Human Behavior (in press).
Cress, U., Kimmerle, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Information exchange with shared databases as a social dilemma: The effect of metaknowledge, bonus systems, and costs. Communication Research, 33, 370–390.
Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (Eds.) (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.
Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impression online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441.
Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64.
Fuks, H., Pimentel, M., & Pereira de Lucena, C. J. (2006). R-U-Typing-2-Me? Evolving a chat tool to increase understanding in learning activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 117–142.
Gangestad, S. W., & Synder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530–555.
Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 152–177.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor.
Gross, T., Stary, C., & Totter, A. (2005). A user-centered awareness in computer-supported cooperative work-systems: Structured embedding of findings from social sciences. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 18, 323–350.
Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, 85–93.
Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 147–166.
Hinds, P., & Kiesler, S. (2002). Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI, 92, 119–125.
Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H., & Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), 153–169.
Huber, G. P. (2001). Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: Unexplored issues and suggested studies. European Journal of Information Systems, 10(2), 72–79.
Jackson, T. (2007). Protective self-presentation, sources of socialization, and loneliness among Australian adolescents and young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1552–1562.
Jian, G., & Jeffres, L. W. (2006). Understanding employees’ willingness to contribute to shared electronic databases: A three-dimensional framework. Communication Research, 33, 242–261.
Johnsen, J.-A. K. (2007). Constraints on message size in quasi-synchronous computer mediated communication: Effect on self-concept accessibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2269–2284.
Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177–192.
Joinson, A. N., & Dietz-Uhler, B. (2002). Explanations for the perpetration of and reactions to deception in a virtual community. Social Science Computer Review, 20, 275–289.
Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 231–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kali, Y. (2006) Collaborative knowledge building using a design principles database. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 187–201.
Kalman, M., Monge, P., Fulk, J., & Heino, R. (2002). Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Communication Research, 29(2), 125–154.
Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2007a). Group awareness and self-presentation in the information-exchange dilemma: An interactional approach. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th computer supported collaborative learning conference (pp. 367–374). New Brunswick: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2007b). Knowledge communication with shared databases. In S. Kelsey & K. St.Amant, (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer-mediated communication. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing (in press).
Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). A challenge for knowledge management: Situational and personal factors of influence in web-based information-exchange. In M. Boumedine, & C. Touzet (Eds.), Knowledge sharing and collaborative engineering (pp. 57–62). Anaheim, Calgary, Zürich: ACTA Press.
Kollock, P. (1998). Social Dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.
Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183–207.
Korn, M. E., & Maggs, J. L. (2004). Why drink less? Diffidence, self-presentation styles, and alcohol use among university students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 201–211.
Kreijns, K., & Gerrissen, J. (1999). Presence and awareness support in VirtualBusiness teams. Proceedings—Frontiers in Education Conference, 3, 13b2-4–13b2-5.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology and Society, 5(1), 8–22.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335–353.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2004). Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (a)synchronous collaborative groups. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7, 155–172.
Laux, L., & Renner, K.-H. (2002). Self-Monitoring und Authentizität: Die verkannten Selbstdarsteller. (Self-monitoring and authenticity: The misjudged self-presenters). Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23, 129–148.
Lee, H. (2005). Implosion, virtuality, and interaction in an Internet discussion group. Information Communication and Society, 8(1), 47–63.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40.
Marcus, B., Machilek, F., & Schütz, A. (2006). Personality in cyberspace: Personal web sites as media for personality expressions and impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1014–1031.
Moinian, F. (2006). The construction of identity on the internet: Oops! I’ve left my diary open to the whole world! Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 13(1), 49–68.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2003). Human–computer-interaction: Psychological aspects of the human use of computing. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 491–516.
Orlikowski, W. (1993). Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Decision Support Systems, 15, 267–284.
Riss, U., Cress, U., Kimmerle, J., & Martin, S. (2007). Knowledge transfer by sharing templates: Two approaches and their psychological requirements. Knowledge Management Research and Practice (in press).
Schau, H. J., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 385–404.
Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.
Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances and private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York, NY: Freeman.
Sohn, D., & Leckenby, J. D. (2007). A structural solution to communication dilemmas in a virtual community. Journal of Communication, 57, 435–449.
Soller, A., Martinez, A., Jermann, P., & Mühlenbrock, M. (2005). From mirroring to guiding: A review of the state of art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 261–290.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of: The learning sciences (pp. 409–425). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Tam, J., & Greenberg, S. (2006). A framework for asynchronous change awareness in collaborative documents and workspaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 583–598.
Tang, J., & Rua, M. (1994). Montage: Providing teleproximity for distributed groups. Conference proceedings on human factors in computing systems, 37–43.
Taylor, D., & Altman, I. (1987). Communication in interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. In M. E. Roloff, & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 257–277). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317–348.
Trammell, K. D., & Keshelashvili, A. (2005). Examining the new influencers: A self-presentation study of a list-blogs. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82, 968–982.
van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., & Simons, P. R. J. (2006). The affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative processing of academic texts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 339–357.
Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the internet. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–44.
Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538–2557.
Weber, J. M., Kopelman, S., & Messick, D. M. (2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 281–307.
Wolfe, R. N., Lennox, R. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1986). Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 356–361.
Wooten, D. B., & Reed II, A. (2004). Playing it safe: Susceptibility to normative influence and protective self-presentation. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 551–556.
Yuan, Y., Fulk, J., Shumate, M., Monge, P. R., Bryant, J. A., & Matsaganis, M. (2005). Individual participation in organizational information commons: The impact of team level social influence and technology-specific competence. Human Communication Research, 31, 212–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kimmerle, J., Cress, U. Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchange. Computer Supported Learning 3, 85–97 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9027-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9027-z