Abstract
When students are left to choose their own approaches to studying, they frequently engage in ineffective learning strategies, such as rereading textbooks or cramming. Given this natural tendency amongst students, there has been significant interest in how to increase the use of more effective methods of studying. Efforts to-date have typically entailed either explicit instruction (e.g., teaching students which study habits are more/less effective) or direct experience (e.g., having students attempt to utilize an effective technique), yielding somewhat mixed results. The aim of the present study was to examine whether a combination of explicit instruction and direct experience with effective learning strategies positively impacts how students study. After an in-classroom intervention, 316 participants (177 women, M age = 19.03) were asked to indicate how frequently they used various studying strategies and how effective they perceived them to be. Participants demonstrated both a change in knowledge regarding the (low) utility of more ineffective strategies and indicated that they were using those strategies less frequently. However, there was not a global change in their perceptions/use of more effective strategies. Instead, there were increases only for a subset of the more effective strategies. These results support metacognitive theories of desirable difficulties, wherein individuals prefer less effortful strategies and less effortful shifts in behavior, as well as suggest possible directions for furthering effective learning practices amongst students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data is available on the OSF site for this project, and the link to the OSF page can be found under the method section.
References
Ahmed, S. F., Tang, S., Waters, N. E., & Davis-Kean, P. (2019). Executive function and academic achievement: Longitudinal relations from early childhood to adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 446. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000296
Ariel, R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2018). Improving self-regulated learning with a retrieval practice intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000133
Balch, W. R. (2001). Study tips: How helpful do introductory psychology students find them? Teaching of Psychology, 28(4), 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2804_09
Bartoszewski, B. L., & Gurung, R. A. (2015). Comparing the relationship of learning techniques and exam score. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(3), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000036
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blasiman, R. N., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2017). The what, how much, and when of study strategies: Comparing intended versus actual study behaviour. Memory (Hove, England), 25(6), 784–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1221974
Bowen, R. W., & Wingo, J. M. (2012). Predicting success in introductory psychology from early testing: High consistency and low trajectory in multiple-choice test performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959926?
Brown-Kramer, C. R. (2021). Improving students’ study habits and course performance with a learning how to learn assignment. Teaching of Psychology, 48(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320959926
Brown-Kramer, C. R. (2022). Teaching students to learn better in introductory psychology: A replication and extension study. Teaching of Psychology, 49(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283219971
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326097
Callender, A. A., & McDaniel, M. A. (2009). The limited benefits of rereading educational texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.07.001
Carpenter, M. J., Jardin, B. F., Burris, J. L., Mathew, A. R., Schnoll, R. A., Rigotti, N. A., & Cummings, K. M. (2013). Clinical strategies to enhance the efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A review of the literature. Drugs, 73(5), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-013-0038-y
Cassidy, S. (2012). Exploring individual differences as determining factors in student academic achievement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 37(7), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.545948
Cathey, C. L., Visio, M. E., Whisenhunt, B. L., Hudson, D. L., & Shoptaugh, C. F. (2016). Helping when they are listening: A midterm study skills intervention for introductory psychology. Brown-Kramer 53 Psychology Learning and Teaching, 15, 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716646319
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., Whiteman, J. A., & Kilcullen, R. N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.835
Curioni, C. C., & Lourenco, P. M. (2005). Long-term weight loss after diet and exercise: A systematic review. International Journal of Obesity, 29(10), 1168–1174. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803015
Dembo, M. H., & Seli, H. P. (2004). Students’ resistance to change in learning strategies courses. Journal of Developmental Education, 27(3), 2–11.
DeWinstanley, P. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2004). Processing strategies and the generation effect: Implications for making a better reader. Memory & Cognition, 32(6), 945–955. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196872
Dombrowski, S. U., Avenell, A., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2010). Behavioural interventions for obese adults with additional risk factors for morbidity: Systematic review of effects on behaviour, weight and Disease risk factors. Obesity Facts, 3(6), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1159/000323076
Donker, A. S., De Boer, H., Kostons, D., Van Ewijk, C. D., & van der Werf, M. P. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2000). Updating knowledge about encoding strategies: A componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 462. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.462
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
Einstein, G. O., Mullet, H. G., & Harrison, T. L. (2012). The testing effect: Illustrating a fundamental concept and changing study strategies. Teaching of Psychology, 39(3), 190–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312450432
Foerst, N. M., Klug, J., Jöstl, G., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2017). Knowledge vs. action: Discrepancies in university students’ knowledge about and self-reported use of self-regulated learning strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01288
Gurung, R. A., & Burns, K. (2019). Putting evidence-based claims to the test: A multi‐site classroom study of retrieval practice and spaced practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(5), 732–743. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3507
Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y
Hassanbeigi, A., Askari, J., Nakhjavani, M., Shirkhoda, S., Barzegar, K., Mozayyan, M. R., & Fallahzadeh, H. (2011). The relationship between study skills and academic performance of university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1416–1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.276
Hattie, J. A., & Donoghue, G. M. (2018). A model of learning: Optimizing the effectiveness of learning strategies. In Contemporary Theories of Learning, (pp. 97–113). https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13
Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.
Hillsdon, M., Foster, C., Cavill, N., Crombie, H., & Naidoo, B. (2005). The effectiveness of public health interventions for increasing physical activity among adults: a review of reviews: Evidence briefing. London: Health Development Agency.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). Guilford Press.
Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, I. I. I. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory (Hove, England), 17(4), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009
Kirk-Johnson, A., Galla, B. M., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2019). Perceiving effort as poor learning: The misinterpreted-effort hypothesis of how experienced effort and perceived learning relate to study strategy choice. Cognitive Psychology, 115, 101237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101237
Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2006). Mending metacognitive illusions: A comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 32(5), 1133–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1133
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194055
Leonard, S., Stroud, M. J., & Shaw, R. J. (2021). Highlighting and taking notes are equally ineffective when reading paper or eText. Education and Information Technologies, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10448-9
Logan, J. M., Castel, A. D., Haber, S., & Viehman, E. J. (2012). Metacognition and the spacing effect: The role of repetition, feedback, and instruction on judgments of learning for massed and spaced rehearsal. Metacognition Learning, 7, 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409012-9090-3
Lyons, K. E., & Zelazo, P. D. (2011). Monitoring, metacognition, and executive function: Elucidating the role of self-reflection in the development of self-regulation. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 40, 379–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-386491-8.00010-4
McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39(3), 462–476. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0035-2
McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & Een, E. (2021). Training college students to use learning strategies: A framework and pilot course. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 20(3), 364–382.
Norman, G. J., Zabinski, M. F., Adams, M. A., Rosenberg, D. E., Yaroch, A. L., & Atienza, A. A. (2007). A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. American journal of preventive medicine, 33(4), 336–345.
Ormrod, J. E. (2012). Human learning (6th ed.). Pearson.
Pan, S. C., & Rivers, M. L. (2023). Metacognitive awareness of the pretesting effect improves with self-regulation support. Memory and Cognition, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01392-1
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Raviv, L., Lupyan, G., & Green, S. C. (2022). How variability shapes learning and generalization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.007
Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000
Susser, J. A., & McCabe, J. (2013). From the lab to the dorm room: Metacognitive awareness and use of spaced study. Instructional Science, 41, 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9231-8
Thomson, C. A., & Ravia, J. (2011). A systematic review of behavioral interventions to promote intake of fruit and vegetables. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 111(10), 1523–1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.07.013
Van Overwalle, F., & De Metsenaere, M. (1990). The effects of attribution-based intervention and study strategy training on academic achievement in college freshmen. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60(3), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1990.tb00946.x
Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on learning strategies. Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 727–747). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50051-2
Williams, S. L., & French, D. P. (2011). What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour—and are they the same? Health Education Research, 26(2), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyr005
Wissman, K. T., & Rawson, K. A. (2018). Collaborative testing for key-term definitions under representative conditions: Efficiency costs and no learning benefits. Memory & Cognition, 46, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0752-x
Acknowledgements
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Table 4
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yüksel, E.M., Green, C.S. & Vlach, H.A. Effect of instruction and experience on students’ learning strategies. Metacognition Learning 19, 345–364 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09372-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09372-9