Referring to current research on self-regulated learning, we analyse individual regulation in terms of a set of specific sequences of regulatory activities. Successful students perform regulatory activities such as analysing, planning, monitoring and evaluating cognitive and motivational aspects during learning not only with a higher frequency than less successful learners, but also in a different order—or so we hypothesize. Whereas most research has concentrated on frequency analysis, so far, little is known about how students’ regulatory activities unfold over time. Thus, the aim of our approach is to also analyse the temporal order of spontaneous individual regulation activities. In this paper, we demonstrate how various methods developed in process mining research can be applied to identify process patterns in self-regulated learning events as captured in verbal protocols. We also show how theoretical SRL process models can be tested with process mining methods. Thinking aloud data from a study with 38 participants learning in a self-regulated manner from a hypermedia are used to illustrate the methodological points.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abbott, A., & Hrycak, A. (1990). Measuring resemblance in sequence data: an optimal matching analysis of musicians’ careers. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 144–185.
Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1995). Mining sequential patterns. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE95).
Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: a discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 87–95.
Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1–2), 87–111.
Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., & Chauncey, A. D. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory proceses during hypermedia learning: issues and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 210–223.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Bannert, M. (2007). Metakognition beim lernen mit hypermedien. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Bannert, M. (2009). Promoting self-regulated learning through prompts: a discussion. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 22(2), 139–145.
Bannert, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2013). Scaffolding Hypermedia Learning through Metacognitive Prompts. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer Science.
Bannert, M., & Reimann, P. (2011). Supporting self-regulated hypermedia learning through prompts. Instructional Science, 1, 193–211.
Biggs, J. B. (1988). Approaches to learning and to essay writing. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 185–228). New York: Plenum Press.
Biswas, G., Jeong, H., Kinnebrew, J., Sulcer, B., & Roscoe, R. (2010). Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment. Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning (RPTEL), 5(2), 123–152.
Biswas, G., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Segedy, J. R. (2012). Analyzing Student Learning and Metacognitive Processes in a Choice-Rich Science Learning Environment. Paper presented at the 5th Biennial Meeting of the EARLI Special Interest Group on Metacognition. Milano, Italy.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186.
Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic.
Borkowski, J. G. (1996). Metacognition: theory or chapter heading? Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 391–402.
Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315.
De Beer, H. T., & van den Brand, P. C. W. (2007). The LTL checker plugins. A (reference) manual. Eindhoven: University of Eindhoven.
De Jong, F. (1994). Task and student dependency in using self-regulation activities: consequences for process-oriented instruction. In F. de Jong & B. van Hout-Wolters (Eds.), Process-oriented instruction: Verbal and pictorial aid and comprehension strategies (pp. 87–99). Amsterdam: VU University Press.
Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition. Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gill, A. (1962). Introduction to the theory of finite-state machines. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Glymour, C., Madigan, D., Predibon, D., & Smyth, P. (1996). Statistical inference and data mining. Communication of the ACM, 39, 35–41.
Greene, J. A., Muis, K. R., & Pieschl, S. (2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in students’ self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 245–257.
Günther, C., & van der Aalst, W. (2007). Fuzzy Mining: Adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. In G. Alonso, P. Dadam, & M. Rosemann (Eds.), International conference on business process management (BPM 2007) (pp. 328–343). Berlin: Springer.
Hadwin, A. F., Nesbit, J. C., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., & Winne, P. H. (2007). Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2), 107–124.
Kapur, M. (2011). Temporality matters: advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 6(1), 39–56.
Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. (2008). Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups. Computers and Education, 51, 54–66.
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts—a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychological Review, 18, 159–185.
Kristensen, L. M., Christensen, S., & Jensen, K. (1998). The practitioner’s guide to coloured Petri nets. International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT), 2, 98–132.
Lajoie, S. P., & Lu, J. (2012). Supporting collaboration with technology: does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine? Metacognition and Learning, 7, 45–62.
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
Manlove, S., Lazonder, A., & De Jong, T. (2007). Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2), 141–155.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Mohr, L. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: to what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia learning? Metacognition and Learning, 4(3), 197–216.
Perera, D., Kay, J., Koprinska, I., Yacef, K., & Zaiane, O. (2009). Clustering and sequential pattern mining of online collaborative learning data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(6), 759–772.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–502). San Diego: Academic.
Poole, M. S., van de Ven, A., Dooley, K., & Holmes, M. E. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes. Theories and methods for research. New Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., MacCallum, R. C., & Nicewander, W. A. (2005). Use of the extreme groups approach: a critical reexamination and new recommendations. Psychological Methods, 10(2), 178.
ProM (Version 5.0) [Computer Software]. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.processmining.org.
Reimann, P. (2009). Time is precious: variable-and event-centred approaches to process analysis in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 239–257.
Reimann, P., & Yacef, K. (2013). Using process mining for understanding learning. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, J. D. M. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology. New York: Routledge.
Reimann, P., Frerejean, J., & Thompson, K. (2009). Using process mining to identify models of group decision making processes in chat data. In C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann, & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning practives: CSCL2009 conference proceedings (pp. 98–107). Rhodes: International Society for the Learning Sciences.
Reisig, W. (1985). Petri nets. An introduction. Berlin: Springer.
Robero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M., & Baker, R. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of educational data mining. Boca Raton: Chapman&Hall/CRC.
Rozinat, A., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2006). Decision mining in ProM. In S. Dustdar, J. L. Fiadeiro, & A. Sheth (Eds.), BPM 2006, volume 4102 of lecture notes in computer science (pp. 420–425). Berlin: Springer.
Rozinat, A., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2008). Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Eindhoven University.
Sanderson, P. M., & Fisher, C. (1994). Exploratory sequential data analysis: foundations. Human-Computer Interaction, 9, 251–317.
Schoor, C., & Bannert, M. (2012). Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1321–1331.
Sun, R., Coward, L. A., & Zenzen, M. J. (2005). On levels of cognitive modeling. Philosphical Psychology, 18(5), 613–637.
Trčka, N., Pechenizkiy, M., & van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2010). Process mining from educational data. In C. Robero, S. Ventura, M. Pechenizkiy, & R. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of educational data mining (pp. 123–142). Boca Raton: Chapman&Hall/CRC.
Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327–353.
Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267–276.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (1995). Graph theoretic techniques for examining patterns and strategies in students’ studying: An application of LogMill. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2009). Supporting self-regulated learning with cognitive tools. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education. New York: Routledge.
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego: Academic.
Wirth, J. (2004). Selbstregulation von Lernprozessen. Münster: Waxmann.
Zhou, M., Xu, Y. X., Nesbit, J. C., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Sequential pattern analysis of learning logs: Methodology and applications. In C. Robero, S. Ventura, M. Pechenizkiy, & R. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of educational data mining (pp. 107–121). Boca Raton: Chapman&Hall/CRC.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitiv perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic.
We thank the German Research Foundation for funding (DFG: BA 2044/5-1).
About this article
Cite this article
Bannert, M., Reimann, P. & Sonnenberg, C. Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition Learning 9, 161–185 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6