Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers' main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Afflerbach, P. (2000). Verbal reports and protocol analysis. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research. Volume III (pp. 163–179). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, D., & Paris, S. (in preparation). Clarifying differences between reading skills and strategies.

  4. Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander, J. M., Carr, M. & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, L. (1994). Fostering metacognitive development. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior. Vol. 25 (pp. 201–239). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 729–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berk, L. E. (2003). Child Development (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Borkowski, J. G. (1992). Metacognitive theory: A framework for teaching literacy, writing, and math skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 77–165). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, A. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1978). Skills, plans, and self-regulation. In R. S. Siegel (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 3–35). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension skills: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. In J. D. Day, & J. G. Borkowski (Eds.). Intelligence and exceptionality: New directions for theory, assessment, and instructional practices (pp. 81–131). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2003). Can off-line metacognition enhance mathematical problem solving? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 188–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgment of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 20, 374–380.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Efklides, A., & Vauras, M. (1999). Introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 455–459.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Elshout-Mohr, M., Van Hout-Wolters, B., & Broekkamp, H. (1999). Mapping situations in classroom and research: Eight types of instructional-learning episodes. Learning and Instruction, 9, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 274–290.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail, & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glaser, R., Schauble, L., Raghavan, K., & Zeitz, C. (1992). Scientific reasoning across different domains. In E de Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (NATO ASI series F, Vol. 84, pp. 345–371). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harris, K. R., Reid, R. R., & Graham, S. (2004). Self-regulation among students with LD and ADHD. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities, 3rd ed. (pp. 167–195). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kelemen, W. L., Frost, P. J., & Weaver III, C. A. (2000). Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 28, 92–107.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kinnunen, R., & Vauras, M. (1995). Comprehension monitoring and the level of comprehension in high- and low-achieving primary school children's reading. Learning and Instruction, 5, 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 31–64). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 281–310.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kuhn, D. (1999). Metacognitive development. In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology. A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 259–286). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leutner, D., & Leopold, C. (2000). Selbstreguliertes Lernen als Selbstregulation von Lernstrategien-Ein Trainingsexperiment mit Berufstätigen zum Lernen aus Sachtexten. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 31, 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mason, L., & Scrivani, L. (2004). Enhancing students' mathematical beliefs: An intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 14, 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Masui, C., & de Corte, E. (1999). Enhancing learning and problem solving skills: Orienting and self-judging, two powerful and trainable learning tools. Learning and Instruction, 9, 517–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J. & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (in press). Metacognitive activities in text studying and problem solving: Development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation.

  32. Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.) (1994). Metacognition. Knowing about knowing. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nist, S. L., Simpson, M. L., & Olejnik, S. (1991). The relation between self-selected study processes and test performance. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 849–874.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Otero, J., Campanario, J. M., & Hopkins, K. D. (1992). The relationship between academic achievement and metacognitive comprehension monitoring ability of Spanish secondary school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 419–430.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, S. (Eds.) (2002). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington DC: National Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pinon, K, Allain, P., Kefi, M. Z., Dubas, F., & Le Gall, D. (2005). Monitoring processes and metamemory experience in patients with dysexecutive syndrome. Brain and Cognition, 57, 185–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated leaning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education. Theory, research, and applications, (2nd ed). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pressley, M. (2000). Development of grounded theories of complex cognitive processing: Exhaustive within- and between study analyses of thinking-aloud data. In G. Schraw, & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 262–296). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Reder, L. M. (1996). Implicit Memory and Metacognition. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schnotz, W. (1992). Metacognition and self regulation in text processing: Some comments. In M. Carretero, M. L. Pope, R. J. Simons, & J. I. Pozo (Eds.), Learning and instruction. European research in an international context, Vol. 3 (pp. 365–375). Elsmford, NY: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Schraw, G., & Nietfeld, J. (1998). A further test of the general monitoring skill hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 236–248.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., Bendixen, L. D., & Roedel, T. D. (1995). Does a general monitoring skill exist? Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of the mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Swanson, H. L., Christie, L. and Rubadeau, R. J. (1993). The Relationship between metacognition and analogical reasoning in mentally retarded, learning disabled, average, and gifted children. Learning Disabilities Research, 8, 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Thomas, G. (2003). Conceptualisation, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the metacognitive orientations of science classroom learning environments: The Metacognitive Orientation Learning Environment Scale–Science (MOLES–S). Learning Environment Research, 6, 175–197.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Thorpe, K. J., & Satterly, D. J. H. (1990). The development and inter-relationship of metacognitive components among primary school children. Educational Psychology, 10, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (1997). Studying the relationship between affective and metacognitive variables. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 10, 59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Van Hout-Wolters, B. (2000). Assessing active self-directed learning. In: R. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 83–101). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Van Kraayenoord, C. E., & Schneider, W. E. (1999). Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in grade 3 and 4. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 305–324.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Veenman, M. V. J. (1998). Kennis en vaardigheden; Soorten kennis een vaardigheden die relevant zijn voor reken-wiskunde taken. [Knowledge and skills that are relevant to math tasks]. In A. Andeweg, J. E. H. van Luit, M. V. J. Veenman, & P. C. M. Vendel, (Eds.), Hulp bij leerproblemen; Rekenen-wiskunde (pp. G0050.1–13). Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Veenman, M. V. J. (2005). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs? In C. Artelt, & B. Moschner (Eds), Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (pp. 75–97). Berlin: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Veenman, M. V. J., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). Intellectual and metacognitive skills of novices while studying texts under conditions of text difficulty and time constraint. Learning and Instruction, 14, 619–638.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Veenman, M. V. J. & Verheij, J. (2003). Identifying technical students at risk: Relating general versus specific metacognitive skills to study success. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 259–272.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., & Groen, M. G. M. (1993). Thinking aloud: Does it affect regulatory processes in learning. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 18, 322–330.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., & Busato, V. V. (1994). Metacognitive mediation in learning with computer-based simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., & Meijer, J. (1997). The generality vs. domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and Instruction, 7, 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Veenman, M. V. J., Kerseboom, L, & Imthorn, C. (2000). Test anxiety and metacognitive skillfulness: Availability versus production deficiencies. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 13, 391–412.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Veenman, M.V.J., Kok, R. & Kuilenburg, J. (2001). Intelligence and metacognitive skillfulness in secondary education. In F. Oser & U. Baets (Eds.), 9th European Conference on Learning and Instruction, Abstract Volume (pp. 166). Aachen: Mainz.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Veenman, M. V. J., Prins, F. J., & Elshout, J. J. (2002). Initial learning in a complex computer simulated environment: The role of metacognitive skills and intellectual ability. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Veenman, M. V. J., Prins, F. J., & Verheij, J. (2003). Learning styles: Self-reports versus thinking-aloud measures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Veenman, M. V. J., Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction, 14, 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Veenman, M. V. J., Kok, R., & Blöte, A. W. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills at the onset of metacognitive skill development. Instructional Science, 33, 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Volet, S. E. (1991). Modelling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students' learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Whitebread, D. (1999). Interactions between children's metacognitive abilities, working memory capacity, strategies and performance during problem-solving. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 489–507.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10, 268–288.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30, 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Zohar, A. (1999). Teachers' metacognitive knowledge and the instruction of higher order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcel V. J. Veenman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veenman, M.V.J., Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M. & Afflerbach, P. Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning 1, 3–14 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Methodological Consideration