Skip to main content

Beyond mean–variance: assessing hedge fund performance in a non-parametric world

Abstract

This paper uses Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to compare the performance of hedge funds to that of equities. The analysis covers the period from January 1999 to December 2013 and shows that under a mean–variance DEA, hedge funds significantly outperform equities. However, this outperformance is no longer significant when skewness and kurtosis are integrated. The DEA technique is particularly interesting for assessing hedge fund performance because of its flexibility and its non-parametric property: DEA allows to easily add additional attributes to the analysis and assesses performance relative to the sample under analysis without requiring any benchmark.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Refinitiv’s Lipper Fund Research, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Refinitiv.

Notes

  1. The Mann–Whitney test is a non-parametric statistical test that tests the null hypothesis that the averages of two groups are equal.

  2. DMUs refer to hedge funds and equities in our case.

  3. TASS started keeping defunct funds inside their database only after January 1994. Before that date, defunct funds were completely deleted. Therefore, to avoid survivorship bias, we only include funds that were launched as from January 1994.

  4. Those are mainly series of different share classes of the same fund.

  5. An analysis with value-weighted returns is also conducted and the findings are similar.

  6. As stated above, DEA scores measure the distance that separates each unit from the efficient frontier. Hence, the lower the DEA score, the closer the unit is to the efficient frontier.

  7. This might be due to the small sample size of the DSB category.

  8. The NBER defines the financial crisis as starting in December 2007 and lasting until June 2009.

References

  • Ackermann, C., McEnally, R., Ravenscraft, D.: The performance of hedge funds: risk, return, and incentives. J. Financ. 54, 833–874 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, V., Naik, Y.N.: Risks and portfolio decisions involving hedge funds. Rev. Financ. Stud. 17, 63–98 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, G.S., Kat, H.M.: Hedge fund performance 1990–2000: Do the “money machines” really add value? J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 38, 251–274 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bali, T.G., Brown, S.J., Demirtas, K.O.: Do hedge funds outperform stocks and bonds? Manage. Sci. 59(8), 1887–1903 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R.G., Chung, Y., Färe, R.: Profit, directional distance functions, and nerlovian efficiency. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 120, 1–27 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the inefficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2, 429–444 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J.D., Weiss, M.A.: Analyzing firm performance in the insurance industry using frontier efficiency and productivity methods. In: Handbook of Insurance, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, George D. Boston (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eling, M.: Performance measurement of hedge funds using data envelopment analysis. Fin. Markets. Portfolio Mgmt. 20, 442–471 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S.: Theory and application of directional distance functions. J. Prod. Anal. 13, 93–103 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, W., Hsieh, D.A.: Empirical characteristics of dynamic trading strategies: the case of hedge funds. Rev. Financ. Stud. 10, 275–302 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, W., Hsieh, D.A.: The risk in hedge fund strategies: theory and evidence from trend followers. Rev. Financ. Stud. 14, 313–341 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glawischnig, M., Sommersguster-Reichmann, M.: Assessing the performance of alternative investments using non-parametric efficiency measurement approaches: Is it convincing? J. Bank. Finance 34, 295–303 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriou, G.N.: Performance appraisal of funds of hedge funds using data envelopment analysis. J. Wealth Manag. 5, 88–95 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriou, G.N.: Trading efficiency of commodity trading advisors using data envelopment analysis. Deriv. Use Trad. Regul. 12, 102–114 (2006b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoriou, G.N., Zhu, J.: Data envelopment analysis: a way to assess the efficiency of funds of hedge funds. J. Portf. Manag. 33, 120–132 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshno, M., Levy, H.: Preferred by “all” and preferred by “most” decision makers: almost stochastic dominance. Manage. Sci. 48(8), 1074–1085 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lhabitant, F.S.: Hedge Funds: Quantitative Insights. Wiley, London (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lhabitant, F.S.: Handbook of Hedge Funds. Wiley, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, B.: The performance of hedge funds. Financ. Anal. J. 55, 72–85 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Thi-Thanh, H.: On the use of data envelopment analysis in hedge fund selection. Working Paper, Université d’Orléans (2006)

  • Scott, R., Horvath, P.: On the direction of preference for moments of higher order than the variance. J. Financ. 35, 910–919 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva Portela, M.C.A., Thanassoulis, E., Simpson, G.: Negative data in DEA: a directional distance approach applied to bank branches. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55, 1111–1121 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., Vanhems, A., Wilson, P.W.: Statistical inference for DEA estimators of directional distance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 220, 853–864 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens, K., Zhu, J.: Portfolio evaluation and benchmark selection: a mathematical programming approach. J. Altern. Invest. 4(1), 9–19 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Thomson Reuters for providing us with data on hedge funds. We are also grateful for the helpful comments and suggestions made by the editor Markus Schmid, Caroline Buts, Catherine Dehon, Pascal François, Laurent Gheeraert, Federico Platania, Olivier Scaillet, and two anonymous referees.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afrae Hassouni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassouni, A., Pirotte, H. Beyond mean–variance: assessing hedge fund performance in a non-parametric world. Financ Mark Portf Manag 36, 473–488 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-022-00409-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-022-00409-8

Keywords

JEL Classification