Skip to main content
Log in

Flight-to-quality in the stock–bond return relation: a regime-switching copula approach

  • Published:
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the existence, intensity and international dependence of flight-to-quality from stocks to government bonds. To this end, we develop a two-state regime-switching bivariate copula model and apply it to the domestic and cross-country stock–bond return pairs of six developed countries (France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, the UK and the US) over the period 1999–2019. We find that US and UK government bonds have played a primary role of safe-haven assets during stock market downturns. The remaining government bond markets show the evidence of flight-to-quality, but its intensity is relatively weak. Further, we find that although flight-to-quality tends to occur simultaneously in multiple countries, the frequency of the joint occurrence varies across government bond markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Early studies that introduce a RS framework into copulas are Chollete et al. (2009), Jondeau and Rockinger (2006), Okimoto (2008) and Rodriguez (2007) in which the dependence structure of international stock markets is investigated.

  2. Garcia and Tsafack (2011) analyze the dependence structure between four variables (stock and government bond returns of two countries). Extending our bivariate model to multivariate distributions requires substantial computational burden, and thus, we leave it to future work.

  3. Durand et al. (2010) derive a copula function that combines Frank and Gumbel copulas to capture both a normal situation of positive correlation and a rare event of flight-to-quality between stock and bond markets. This is a very flexible model, but our RS copula model is more flexible in that asymmetric copulas other than Gumbel (Clayton and Joe in this paper) can be used for describing an asymmetric regime.

  4. Hartmann et al. (2004) find that stock–bond contagion is approximately as frequent as flight-to-quality from stocks to bonds in G-5 countries over the period 1987–1999. However, our earlier analysis presents no evidence on the contagion over the period 1999–2019, and hence, this paper only studies flight-to-quality phenomena.

  5. Note, however, that the differences between the unconditional means of the two returns do not affect the estimation result of the dependence structure because they are removed in the copula approach by filtering the conditional mean and variance of marginal distributions.

  6. We do not report the standard errors and significance of the exceedance correlation estimates in the table because the t-test using the standard errors leads to the same result as the Wald test for \(H_0: \rho = \rho ^{\mathrm{{asy}}}_{\mathrm{{nor}}} = 0\).

  7. See Appendix 1 in Longin and Solnik (2001) for the method to compute the optimal threshold values.

  8. See Joe (1997, (2015) and Nelsen (2006) for a comprehensive exposition of copulas.

  9. The starting value \(\xi _{1|0}\) is set equal to the vector of unconditional probabilities for two states, that is, \([(1-p_{22})/(2-p_{11}-p_{22}), (1-p_{11})/(2-p_{11}-p_{22})]'\).

  10. To save space, we do not report the estimated coefficients on the ARMA and GARCH terms as they are relatively less informative. These results are available from the authors upon request.

  11. The delta method is used to compute standard errors for the estimates of Kendall’s \(\tau \) and LU tail dependence.

  12. There are two exceptions, UK–JP and US–JP (Table 10), for which incorrect estimates are obtained (bounded estimates of 0.5 for the transition probabilities and very large standard errors). Thus, for the two pairs, we regard the normal–asymmetric RS copula model reported in Panel A as the most appropriate model, but its normal regime, rather than the asymmetric one, as a regime to describe flight-to-quality events.

  13. There are two slight differences, which are explained in the subsequent two footnotes. The whole of the results with a threshold value of 0.15 is available from the authors upon request.

  14. When relying on the different definition of flight-to-quality with a threshold value of 0.15, there are three cases where domestic flight-to-quality simultaneously occurs in all countries.

  15. For the different definition of flight-to-quality with a threshold value of 0.15, the ratio for Switzerland is low compared to the other three European countries. This suggests some degree of independence of Swiss financial markets from the three European countries.

References

  • Andersson, M., Krylova, E., Vähämaa, S.: Why does the correlation between stock and bond returns vary over time? Appl. Financ. Econ. 18, 139–151 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslanidis, N., Christiansen, C.: Smooth transition patterns in the realized stock–bond correlation. J. Empir. Finance 19, 454–464 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, N., Connolly, R.A., Stivers, C.: Regime-switching in stock index and treasury futures returns and measures of stock market stress. J. Futures Mark. 30, 753–779 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur, D.G., Lucey, B.M.: Flights and contagion—an empirical analysis of stock–bond correlations. J. Financ. Stab. 5, 339–352 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, T., Cooke, R.M.: Probability density decomposition for conditionally dependent random variables modeled by vines. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 32, 245–268 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, T., Cooke, R.M.: Vines—a new graphical model for dependent random variables. Ann. Stat. 30, 1031–1068 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-L., Hsueh, P.L.: An investigation of the flight-to-quality effect: evidence from Asia-Pacific countries. Emerg. Mark. Finance Trade 49, 53–69 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.B., Silvapulle, P., Silvapulle, M.: A semiparametric approach to value-at-risk, expected shortfall and optimum asset allocation in stock–bond portfolios. Econ. Model. 42, 230–242 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, T.C., Li, J., Yang, S.-Y.: Dynamic stock–bond return correlations and financial market uncertainty. Rev. Quant. Financ. Acc. 45, 59–88 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chollete, L., Heinen, A., Valdesogo, A.: Modeling international financial returns with a multivariate regime-switching copula. J. Financ. Econom. 7, 437–480 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui, C.M., Yang, J.: Extreme correlation of stock and bond futures markets: international evidence. Financ. Rev. 47, 565–87 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, R., Stivers, C., Sun, L.: Stock market uncertainty and the stock–bond return relation. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 40, 161–194 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, R.A., Stivers, C., Sun, L.: Commonality in the time-variation of stock–stock and stock–bond return comovements. J. Financ. Mark. 10, 192–218 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dajcman, S.: Comovement between Stock and bond markets and the ’flight-to-quality’ during financial market turmoil—a case of the eurozone countries most affected by the sovereign debt crisis of 2010–2011. Appl. Econ. Lett. 19, 1655–1662 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, R.B., Junker, M., Szimayer, A.: The flight-to-quality effect: a copula-based analysis. Account. Finance 50, 281–299 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatum, R., Yamamoto, Y.: Intra-safe haven currency behavior during the global financial crisis. J. Int. Money Finance 66, 49–64 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R., Tsafack, G.: Dependence structure and extreme comovements in international equity and bond markets. J. Bank. Finance 35, 1954–1970 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R., Runkle, D.E.: On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. J. Finance 48, 1779–1801 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulko, L.: Decoupling: If the U.S. treasury repays its debt, what then? J. Portf. Manag. 28, 59–66 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J.: Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B.E.: Autoregressive conditional density estimation. Int. Econ. Rev. 35, 705–730 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, P., Straetmans, S., de Vries, C.G.: Asset market linkages in crisis periods. Rev. Econ. Stat. 86, 313–326 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilmanen, A.: Stock–bond correlations. J. Fixed Income Fall 13, 55–66 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jammazi, R., Tiwari, A.K., Ferrer, R., Moya, P.: Time-varying dependence between stock and government bond returns: international evidence with dynamic copulas. N. Am. J. Econ. Finance 33, 74–93 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joe, H.: Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts. Chapman & Hall, London (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joe, H.: Dependence Modeling with Copulas. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Joe, H., Xu, J.J.: The Estimation Method of Inference Functions for Margins for Multivariate Models. Technical Report No. 166, Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia (1996)

  • Jondeau, E., Rockinger, M.: The Copula-GARCH model of conditional dependencies: an international stock market application. J. Int. Money Finance 25, 827–853 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-J., Moshirian, F., Wu, E.: Evolution of international stock and bond market integration: influence of the European monetary union. J. Bank. Finance 30, 1507–1534 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupskii, P., Joe, H.: Factor copula models for multivariate data. J. Multivar. Anal. 120, 85–101 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupskii, P., Joe, H.: Structured factor copula models: theory, inference and computation. J. Multivar. Anal. 138, 53–73 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longin, F., Solnik, B.: Extreme correlation of international equity markets. J. Finance 56, 649–676 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen, R.B.: An Introduction to Copulas. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, P., Liu, W.: Time-varying linkage of possible safe haven assets: a cross-market and cross-asset analysis. Int. Rev. Finance 17, 43–76 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmi, H., Okimoto, T.: Trends in stock–bond correlations. Appl. Econ. 48, 536–552 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto, T.: New evidence of asymmetric dependence structures in international equity markets. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 43, 787–815 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, A.J.: Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence. Int. Econ. Rev. 47, 527–556 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, A.J.: Copula-based models for financial time series. In: Andersen, T.G., Davis, R.A., Kreiß, J.-P., Mikosch, T. (eds.) Handbook of Financial Time Series, pp. 767–785. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ranaldo, A., Söderlind, P.: Safe haven currencies. Rev. Finance 14, 385–407 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, J.C.: Measuring financial contagion: a copula approach. J. Empir. Finance 14, 401–423 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-C., Lin, Z.-Y.: An economic evaluation of stock–bond return comovements with copula-based GARCH models. Quant. Finance 14, 1283–1296 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to an anonymous referee for valuable comments and suggestions. I also acknowledge financial support from JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No.: 16K03746).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minoru Tachibana.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tachibana, M. Flight-to-quality in the stock–bond return relation: a regime-switching copula approach. Financ Mark Portf Manag 34, 429–470 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-020-00361-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-020-00361-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation