Advertisement

Financial Markets and Portfolio Management

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 113–136 | Cite as

Does female management influence firm performance? Evidence from Luxembourg banks

  • Regina M. Reinert
  • Florian Weigert
  • Christoph H. WinnefeldEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this study, we examine the relationship between the proportion of women in top management positions at banks and these institutions’ financial performance. Using prudential data from supervisory reporting for all credit institutions in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg from 1999 to 2013, we find a positive association between female management and firm performance. The economic effect is substantial: a 10 % increase in women in top management positions improves the bank’s future return on equity by more than 3 % p.a. Moreover, we show that this positive relationship is (i) almost twice as large during the global financial crisis than in stable market conditions and (ii) non-linear, with banks having 20–40 % female management being the most successful.

Keywords

Management diversity Female management Bank performance 

JEL Classification

G21 J16 L25 M14 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Claude Reiser, Conseiller de Direction 1\(^{\grave{e}re}\) Classe, for valuable research assistance and the anonymous referee for detailed comments and suggestions that were very helpful in improving the paper.

References

  1. Adams, R.B., Ferreira, D.: Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J. Financ. Econ. 94, 291–309 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, R.B., Ragunathan, V.: Lehman Sisters. In: Working Paper, University of New South Wales and University of Queensland (2012)Google Scholar
  3. Adler, R.D.: Women in the executive suite correlate to high profits. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79, 1–8 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. Aebi, V., Sabato, G., Schmid, M.: Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis. J. Bank. Financ. 36, 3213–3226 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahern, K.R., Dittmar, A.K.: The changing of the boards: the impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econ. 127, 137–197 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Apesteguia, J., Azmat, G., Iriberri, N.: The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: evidence from the field. Manag. Sci. 58, 78–93 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arellano, M., Bond, S.: Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58, 277–297 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bear, S., Rahman, N., Post, C.: The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J. Bus. Ethics 97, 207–221 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck, T., Behr, P., Guettler, A.: Gender and banking: are women better loan officers? Rev. Financ. 17, 1279–1321 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell, L. A.: Women-led firms and the gender gap in top executive jobs. In: Working Paper, IZA Bonn (2005)Google Scholar
  11. Berger, A.N., Kick, T., Schaeck, K.: Executive board composition and bank risk taking. J. Corp. Financ. 28, 48–65 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter, M.A., Geletkanycz, M.A., Sanders, W.G.: Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Manag. 30, 749–778 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. Carter, D.A., Simkins, B.J., Simpson, W.G.: Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financ. Rev. 38, 33–53 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Catalyst (Firm): The Bottom Line: Connecting Corporate Performance and Gender Diversity. Catalyst, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Croson, R., Gneezy, U.: Gender differences in preferences. J. Econ. Lit. 47, 448–474 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demirgüc-Kunt, A., Huizinga, H.: Bank activity and funding strategies: the impact on risk and returns. J. Financ. Econ. 98, 626–650 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dezsö, C.L., Ross, D.G.: Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strateg. Manag. J. 33, 1072–1089 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Du Rietz, A., Henrekson, M.: Testing the female underperformance hypothesis. Small Bus. Econ. 14, 1–10 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eckel, C.C., Grossman, P.J.: Men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence. In: Plott, C., Smith, V. (eds.) Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, pp. 1061–1073. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellul, A., Yerramilli, V.: Stronger risk controls, lower risk: evidence from U.S. bank holding companies. J. Financ. 68, 1757–1803 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erhardt, N.L., Werbel, J.D., Shrader, C.B.: Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 11, 102–111 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hambrick, D.C., Mason, P.A.: Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9, 193–206 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison, D.A., Klein, K.J.: What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32, 1199–1228 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartarska, V.: Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the newly independent states. World Dev. 33, 1627–1643 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartarska, V., Mersland, R.: Which governance mechanisms promote efficiency in reaching poor clients? Evidence from rated microfinance institutions. Eur. Financ. Manag. 18, 218–239 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hartarska, V., Mersland, R., Nadolnyak, D., Parmeter, C.: Governance and scope economies in Microfinance Institutions. Int. J. Corp. Govern. 4, 74–96 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hartarska, V., Nadolnyak, D.: Board size and diversity as governance mechanisms in community development loan funds in the USA. Appl. Econ. 44, 4313–4329 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jonsen, K., Maznevski, M.L., Schneider, S.C.: Diversity and its not so diverse literature: an international perspective. Int. J. Cross Cult. Manag. 11, 35–62 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joshi, A., Roh, H.: The role of context in work team diversity research: a meta-analytic review. Acad. Manag. J. 52, 599–627 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirchmeyer, C., McLellan, J.: Capitalizing on ethnic diversity: an approach to managing the diverse workgroups of the 1990s. Can. J. Admin. Sci. 8, 72–79 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., Leonard, J., Levine, D., Thomas, D.: The effects of diversity on business performance: report of the diversity research networks. Human Res. Manag. 42, 3–21 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laeven, L., Levine, R.: Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. J. Financ. Econ. 93, 259–275 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newey, W.K., West, K.D.: A simple positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55, 703–708 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richard, O.C., Kirby, S.L., Chadwick, K.: The impact of racial and gender diversity in management on financial performance: how participative strategy making features can unleash a diversity advantage. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 24, 2571–2582 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rose, C.: Bestyrelsessammensætning og finansiel performance i danske b\(\varnothing \)rsnoterede virksomheder–Er N\(\varnothing \)rbyrapportens anbefalinger til gavn for aktionærerne? In: Working Paper 2004-2, Institut for Finansiering, Handelsh\(\varnothing \)jskolen i K\(\varnothing \)benhavn (2004)Google Scholar
  36. Saunders, A., Schmid, M., Walter, I.: Non-interest income and bank performance. In: Working Paper, New York University and University of St. Gallen (2015)Google Scholar
  37. Schmid, T., Urban, D.: Women on corporate boards: good or bad? In: Working Paper, University of Hong Kong and TUM (2015)Google Scholar
  38. Shrader, C.B., Blackburn, V.B., Iles, P.: Women in management and firm financial performance: an exploratory study. J. Manag. Issues 9, 355–372 (1997)Google Scholar
  39. Smith, N., Smith, V., Verner, M.: Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2300 Danish firms. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 15, 569–593 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., Singh, V.: Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corp. Gov. Int. Rev. 17, 320–337 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M.C.: Work group diversity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 515–541 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White, H.: A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48, 817–830 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Society for Financial Market Research 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Regina M. Reinert
    • 1
  • Florian Weigert
    • 2
  • Christoph H. Winnefeld
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of St.Gallen and Hogrefe ConsultingBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.School of FinanceUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
  3. 3.Commission de Surveillance Du Secteur Financier and Trier University of Applied SciencesLuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations