Advertisement

Financial Markets and Portfolio Management

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 257–273 | Cite as

The effect of personal portfolio reporting on private investors

  • Ralf GerhardtEmail author
  • Steffen Meyer
Article

Abstract

Information search is costly for private households, especially in relation to their wealth. This paper investigates how retail customers react to free portfolio reporting—and thus reduced search costs—in a unique experimental setting. A large German direct bank sends portfolio reports to 10,000 customers while maintaining a control group of equal size and structure that receives no reports. Analyzing demographics as well as detailed portfolio and trade data, we find that gender, wealth, trade frequency, risk tolerance, and diversification drive the interest in portfolio information. Reading a portfolio report also triggers trading actions; thus, investors seem to appreciate the reduced information costs and act on the information. In addition to contributing to the financial literature on households’ information acquisition, this study derives valuable implications for financial institutions regarding communications and services for their customers.

Keywords

Portfolio reporting Financial information Household portfolios Investment behavior 

JEL Classification

D14 G21 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous referee for his constructive comments, which helped us a great deal in improving the paper.

References

  1. Agnew, J., Balduzzi, P., Sunden, A.: Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401 (k) plan. Am. Econ. Rev. 93(1), 193–215 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. Ameriks, J., Zeldes, S.P.: How do household portfolio shares vary with age?. Working Paper (2004)Google Scholar
  3. Barber, B.M., Odean, T.: All that glitters: the effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Rev. Finan. Stud. 21(2), 785–818 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, B.M., Lee, Y., Liu, Y., Odean, T.: Just how much do individual investors lose by trading? Re. Finan. Stud. 22(2), 609–632 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. Blüthgen, R., Gintschel, A., Hackethal, A., Mueller, A.: Financial advice and individual investors’ portfolios. Working Paper (2007)Google Scholar
  6. Brunnermeier, M.K., Nagel, S.: Do wealth fluctuations generate time-varying risk aversion? Micro-evidence on individuals asset allocation’. Am. Econ. Rev. 98(3), 713–736 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, J.Y.: Household finance. J. Finance 61(4), 1553–1604 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DABbank: Faszination Wertpapier: Fakten und Hintergründe zum Anlegerverhalten in Deutschland. Munich (2004)Google Scholar
  9. DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., Uppal, R.: Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Rev. Finan. Stud. 22(5), 1915–1953 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. Donkers, B., van Soest, A.: Subjective measures of household preferences and financial decisions. J. Econ. Psychol. 20(6), 613–642 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glaser, M.: Online broker investors: demographic information, investment strategy, portfolio positions, and trading activity. Working Paper (2003)Google Scholar
  12. Glaser, M., Weber, M.: Why inexperienced investors do not learn: they do not know their past portfolio performance. Finance Res. Lett. 4(4), 126–203 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guiso, L., Jappelli, T.: Awareness and stock market participation. Rev. Finance 9(4), 537–567 (2005a)Google Scholar
  14. Guiso, L., Jappelli, T.: Household portfolio choice and diversification strategies. Working Paper (2005b)Google Scholar
  15. Guiso, L., Jappelli, T.: Households financial information acquisition and portfolio choice. CEPR Working Paper (2005c)Google Scholar
  16. Lewellen, W.G., Lease, R.C., Schlarbaum, G.G.: Patterns of investment strategy and behavior among individual investors. J. Bus. 50(3), 296–333 (1977)Google Scholar
  17. MacKinlay, A.C.: Event studies in economics and finance. J. Econ. Lit. 35(1), 13–39 (1997)Google Scholar
  18. Mitton, T., Vorkink, K.: Equilibrium underdiversification and the preference for skewness. Rev. Finan. Stud. 20(4), 1255 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Siebenmorgen, N., Weber, M.: A behavioral model for asset allocation. Finan. Mark. Portfolio Manag. 17(1), 15–42 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vissing-Jørgensen, A.: Towards an explanation of household portfolio choice heterogeneity: nonfinancial income and participation cost structures. NBER Working Paper No. 8884 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss Society for Financial Market Research 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goethe-University FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations