Skip to main content

Implied measures of relative fund performance

Abstract

We evaluate the relative performance of funds by conditioning their returns on the cross-section of portfolio characteristics across fund managers. Our implied procedure circumvents the need to specify benchmark returns or peer funds. Instead, fund-specific benchmarks for measuring selection and market timing ability are constructed. This technique is robust to herding as well as window dressing and mitigates survivorship bias. Empirically, the conditional information contained in portfolio weights defined by industry sectors, assets, and geographical regions is important to the assessment of fund management. For each set of portfolio characteristics, we identify funds with success at either selecting securities or timing-the-market.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Agarwal, V., Naik, N.Y.: Multi-period performance persistence analysis of hedge funds. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 35, 327–342 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammann, M., Verhofen, M.: The effect of market regimes on style allocation. Financ. Mark. Portfolio Manag. 20, 309–337 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammann, M., Kessler, S., Tobler, J.: Analyzing active investment strategies. J. Portfolio Manag. 33, 56–67 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson, G.P., Hood, L.R., Beebower, G.L.: Determinants of portfolio performance. Financ. Anal. J. 42, 39–44 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.J., Goetzmann, W.N.: Mutual fund styles. J. Financ. Econ. 43, 373–399 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carhart, M.M.: On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Financ. 52, 57–82 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L.K.C., Chen, H.L., Lakonishok, J.: On mutual fund investment styles. Rev. Financ. Stud. 15, 1407–1437 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., Coval, J., Pástor, L.: Judging fund managers by the company they keep. J. Financ. 60, 1057–1096 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, K., Grinblatt, M., Titman, S., Wermers, R.: Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks. J. Financ. 52, 1035–1058 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., French, K.R.: Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financ. Econ. 33, 3–56 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illmer, S.J., Marty, W.: Return decomposition of absolute-performance multi-asset class portfolios. Financ. Mark. Portfolio Manag. 21, 121–134 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeMoigne, C., Savaria, P.: Relative importance of hedge fund characteristics. Financ. Mark. Portfolio Manag. 20, 419–441 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wermers, R.: Mutual fund herding and the impact on stock prices. J. Financ. 54, 581–622 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitch Warachka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hogan, S., Warachka, M. Implied measures of relative fund performance. Financ Mark Portfolio Manag 22, 47–66 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-007-0070-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-007-0070-6

Keywords

  • Relative performance
  • Fund management

JEL

  • G11