VaR for nonlinear financial instruments — linear approximation or full Monte Carlo?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. ALBANESE, C., A. ALEXANDER and J. C. CHAO (1997): “Bayesian Value at Risk, Backtesting and Calibration”, Working Paper, October 1997, Toronto.

  2. BRUAND, M. (1996): “The jump-diffusion process in Swiss stock returns and its influence on option valuation”, Finanzmarkt und Portfolio Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 75–97.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BOUDOUKH, J., M. RICHARDSON and R. WHITE-LAW (1998): “The best of both worlds”, Risk Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DUFFIE, D., and J. PAN (1997): “An Overview of Value at Risk”, Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 7–44.

    Google Scholar 

  5. FRANKE, G. (2000): “Gefahren kurzsichtigen Risikomanagements durch Value at Risk”; Working Paper, University of Konstanz.

  6. HULL, J. (1999): Options, futures and other derivatives; New York, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  7. HULL, J. and A. WHITE (1998): “Value at risk when Daily Changes in Market Variables are not Normally Distributed”, Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. JORION, P. (1996): Value at Risk: The new benchmark for controlling market risk; New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  9. READ, O. (1998): Parametrische Modelle zur Ermittlung des Value at Risk; Dissertation, University of Cologne.

  10. ROUVINEZ, C. (1997): “Going Greek with VaR”, Risk Magazine, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  11. STUDER, G. (1995): “Value at Risk and Maximum Loss Optimization”, Technical Report, Risk Lab, December 1995.

  12. STUDER, G. (1997): Maximum Loss for Measurement of Risk; Dissertation, ETH Zurich.

  13. VENKATARAMAN, S. (1997): “Value at Risk for a mixture of normal distributions: The use of quasi-Bayesian estimation techniques”, in: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives, March/April 1997, pp. 2–13.

  14. WILSON, T. (1998): “Value at Risk”, in: Alexander, C. (Editor): Risk Management and Analysis — Volume 1: Measuring and Modelling Financial Risk; Chichester (England), John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ZANGARI, P. (1996a): “Market Risk Methodology”, Risk Metrics™ — Technical Document, 4th edition, pp. 105–148.

  16. ZANGARI, P. (1996b): “How accurate is the Delta Gamma Methodology?”, Risk Metrics™ — Monitor, 3rd quarter 1996, pp. 12–29.

  17. ZANGARI, P. (1996c): “A VaR Methodology for Portfolios that include Options”, Risk Metrics™ — Monitor, 1st quarter 1996, pp. 4–12.

  18. ZANGARI, P. (1996d): “An improved Methodology for Measuring VaR”, Risk Metrics™ — Monitor, 2nd quarter 1996, pp. 7–25.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research for this article was conducted while the authors were at the University of St. Gallen. Christian Reich acknowledges financial support from CaRisMa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ammann, M., Reich, C. VaR for nonlinear financial instruments — linear approximation or full Monte Carlo?. Fin Mkts Portfolio Mgmt 15, 363–378 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-001-0306-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Linear Approximation
  • Financial Instrument