Skip to main content
Log in

Chancen und Risiken in den Finanzmärkten

  • Published:
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  • CAMPBELL, J., A. LO und C. MACKINLAY (1997): „The Econometrics of Financial Markets“, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • COCHRANE, J. T. (1997): „Where is the Market Going? Uncertain Facts and Novel Theories“, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 6207.

  • EMBRECHTS, P., C. KLÜPPELBERG und T. MIKOSCH (1997): „Modelling Extremal Events: for Insurance and Finance“, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • JORION, P. und W. N. GOETZMANN (1999): „Global Stock Markets in the Twentieth Century“, Journal of Finance, Vol 54(3), pp. 953–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LUCAS, A. und P. KLAASSEN (1998): „Extreme Returns, Downside Risk, and Optimal Asset Allocation“, Journal of Portfolio Management, Fall 1998, pp. 71–79.

  • MEHRA, R. und E. PRESCOTT (1998): „The Equity Risk Premium: A Puzzle.“, Jounal of Monetary Economics, 15, pp. 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • PORTMAN, T und P. WEGMANN (1998): „Lower Partial Moments und Value-at-Risk: Eine Synthese“, Finanzmarkt und Portfoliomanagement, Vol. 12(3), pp. 326–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIETZ, T. (1988): „The Equity Risk Premium: A Solution?“, Jounal of Monetary Economics, 21, pp. 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIEGEL, J. (1998): „Stocks for the long run: The definitive guide to financial market returns and long-term investment strategies“, McGraw Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIEGEL, J. (2000): „The Shrinking Equity Premium: Historical Facts and Future Forecasts“, Journal of Portfolio Management, Fall 1999, pp. 10–17.

  • SORTINO, F., R. VAN DER MEER und A. PLANTINGA (1999): „The Dutch Triangle: A framework to measure upside potential relative to downside risk“, Journal of Portfolio Management, Fall 1999, pp. 50–58.

  • WEBER, F. (2000): “Modellrisiko bei Value at Risk-Schätzungen: ein Vergleich zwischen Normalverteilung und hyperbolischer Verteilung“, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Vol. 136(1), pp. 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazzoni, C., Weber, M. & Wicki, B. Chancen und Risiken in den Finanzmärkten. Fin Mkts Portfolio Mgmt 15, 212–230 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-001-0206-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-001-0206-z

Navigation